Law of negligence, medical mistakes and patient safety Flashcards
What are the penalties for being found negligent?
Reported to GMC
Fitness to compromise is jeopardised
Who determines liability?
Used to be a jury but it was too expensive for civil cases, so now a judge does it
Can a person run out of time to bring about legal action?
Yes, 3 years from the date of the accident/discovery of the accident - this is because evidence gets lost overtime
What are the 3 elements that patients have to overcome to sue a doctor?
To be negligent in law:
1) The defendant: doctor/HCP must owe the claimant a DUTY OF CARE - prove the doctor/hospital owed them their care
2) The doctor/HCP must be in BREACH of that duty - this is harder to prove, as you need to prove carelessness
3) This breach must CAUSE the patient’s harm - hardest to prove
What is the definition of duty of care ?
in cases where the positive acts of a private individual cause physical damage, the existence of such a duty of care can be assumed
How did the neighbour principle arise?
you owe a duty of care to your neighbour = this is automatically activated by doctor-patient relationship
Legal principle is from the case : Donoghue vs stephenson
A lady had drunk a bottle of ginger beer that her friend had bought her, and it had a decomposing snail in it, causing her to suffer severe gastroenteritis but because she didn’t buy the drink she could sue the manufacturer
What are the differences between civil trial and criminal trial?
Civil trial
- doctor can’t go to jail
- compensation is given to the patient
- doctors normally have subscriptions to MDU or MDS so they payout not you
Criminal trial
- when a patient dies
- crown court
- can be sent to jail
In terms of doctors/HCPs, what does it mean by duty of care?
Practitioners owe a duty to patients on their list
Hospital and its entire staff own a duty to patients admitted to treatment
Reasonable care and skill in diagnosis, treatment and advice
Therefore all a patient really has to do is prove you were their doctor
What is the definition of standard of care in terms of civil negligence?
Civil negligence consists of falling below the standard of care required in the circumstances to protect others from the reasonable risk of harm
It is that of the reasonable doctor/HCP
What is the classic definition of standard of care and what does it means?
Bolam v Friern hospital management committee of 1957
A doctor/HCP will not be negligent if they act in accordance with the practice accepted as proper by a responsible body of medical/professional opinions = therefore if you are doing the same as your colleagues you will not be held as negligent
What is the Bolam test?
Common practice, therefore is the standard and is not set by the GMC, NMC, RPS etc.
It is not based on the best doctor but on the ordinary skilled and experience doctor/pharmacist/nurse
However, if you hold yourself as having specialist skills you will be held against those others with specialist skills
However it is important to note that the law makes no exceptions for lack of experience or lack of skill
What should you do if you are unsure of your competence?
refer on the task or ask for your work to be supervised/checked
The Bolam has been modified now, what is the updated test and what does it mean?
Modified by Bolitho v City & Hackney 1997
Now medical practice is subject to reasonableness and responsibility test
This means that the court can review common practice to ensure that it is reasonable and responsible, therefore even if all HCPs are doing the same you can still be negligent if the court judges it not to be reasonable and responsible
What does it mean by chain of causation?
The claimant must prove that the defendant’s acts or omissions were responsible for their loss
- patient’s harm must have been caused by the defendant’s negligence
What is the “but for” test?
the patient must prove that “but for” the doctor’s negligence they would not have suffered harm
Must prove more likely than not (whereas on balance of probabilities = standard of proof in all civil cases)
- criminal trial proof needs to be beyond reasonable doubt