Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM


Top Flashcards (Certified)
All Flashcards

Law > Law > Flashcards

Law Flashcards

1
Q

Limitation period

A

deadline to bring forward a court notice or claim

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Limitation period deadlines

A

family law: 2 years from divorce or 6 from seperation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Public law

A

law between individuals and states

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Administrative law

A

governs bureaucrats and governemnt officials

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Tribunals

A

quasi-court processes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Tribunals are made up of

A

individuals with specialized knowledge, mostly lawyers and judges

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Natural justice / due process

A

right to be heard, right to a fair hearing, right to appear before an unbiased judge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Court actions against a tribunal decision

A

quash, prohibit, or award damages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Agreement of purchase and sale components

A

document of any sale of property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Joint tenants

A

both parties own 100% of the property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Tenants in common

A

ownership is split any % between parties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Requisition date

A

deadline for buyers to declare any issues they have with the property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Root of title

A

how the owners of the property obtained that property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Planning act

A

the owner has to get government approval if they only want to sell part of the house

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Chattles

A

selling things inside or around the house like decorations and furniture (tool rule)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

HST

A

taxes on buying property, unless it is used residential property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Capital Gains tax

A

taxes on the profit the owner makes from selling a property, unless it was their primary residence for at least 1 year

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Actus reus

A

action of committing a crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Mens rea

A

mental intent to do the crime (subjective and objective)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Subjective mens rea

A

personal connection to the crime (ex. murder of a spouse, or sexual assault of a coworker)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Objective mens rea

A

failing to meet the standard of care of a reasonable person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Principle

A

the one who commits the crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Aider

A

one who assists in committing the crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Counsellor

A

the one who plans the crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Abettor
the one who instigates the crime
26
Accessory after the fact
helping someone after the commit a crime
27
3 categories of offences
summary, indictable, and hybrid
28
Summary offences
less than 2 years sentence, must be charged within 12 months of the crime
29
Indictable offences
18 months and longer sentence, no time limit to be charged
30
Canadian Constitution
rules for lawmakers, limits the government use of power, includes the Charter of Rights and Freedoms
31
R v AM (Charter)
(dog sniffing case) - Section 8: reasonable search and seizure - police search a high school without a warrant upon request of the schools principle - drug-sniffing dog find weed in a student's backpack - Supreme Court ruled there was not enough reasonable suspicion, and the search failed the reasonable search test - fruit of the poison tree: evidence would bring admin of justice into disrepute, so evidence was dismissed
32
R v Feeney (Charter)
(search warrant) - Section 8: unreasonable search and seizure - police investigating a murder where Feeney is a suspect - police entered his property without a search warrant and found him covered in blood - Supreme Court determined that the police entered his property unlawfully, and evidence was dismissed
33
R v Harrison (Charter)
(traffic stop search) - Section 8: unreasonable search and seizure - Section 9: arbitrary detention - police pulled over Harrison on a hunch, searched his car, and found large amounts of cocaine - Supreme Court ruled that police had no ground to stop and search Harrison, so the evidence was dismissed
34
R v Stinchcombe (Charter)
(disclosure of evidence) - Stinchcombe was being charged with theft and fraud - the crown failed to disclose all their evidence to Stinchcombe's defense - Supreme Court ruled that the case would be dismissed because the crown has an obligation to disclose all their evidence before a trial
35
R v Williamson (Charter)
(undue trial delays) - Section 3: undue delays in criminal proceedings - Williamson was charged with sexual assault of young boys in a big brother program - Williamson's trial took 3 years to finish, most of which was the crown's fault - Supreme Court ruled that the trial took too long and so his case was dismissed
36
R v Oakes (Charter)
(Charter violations) - Section 11 D: presumption of innocence - Oakes was charged with drug trafficking for carrying a certain amount of has oil - Section 8 of narcotics code: carrying a certain quantity of has oil presumed trafficking - Supreme Court ruled that the section of the narcotics act was irrational
37
Oakes test (for Charter violations)
1. Violation must be pressing and substantial 2. Violation must be RATIONALLY CONNECTED to the objective 3. Charter rights must be MINIMALLY IMPAIRED 4. Violation must be PROPORTIONAL to the impact the case has on society
38
Plea bargain
defendant pleads guilty to the crime
39
Plea bargain advantages
possible short sentence, less costs, no family members have to be called in
40
Denunciation
judge disproves of the criminal's actions on behalf of soceity
41
General deterence
harsh sentences to deter society from committing the same crime
42
Specific deterence
harsh sentences to deter the criminal from committing that crime again
43
Prison
for sentences of less than 2 years
44
Penitentiary
for sentences of 2 years or longer
45
Intermittent sentence
sentences where time is served in chunks cumulatively
46
Mental health court
criminal court for cases of severe mental health issues (no criminal record)
47
Restitution
compensation for damages caused to personal property during a crime
48
Aggregating factors
factors that increase sentences
49
Mitigating factors
factors that reduce sentences
50
Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) types
mediation, arbitration, and family conferencing
51
Mediation
an unbiased third party tries to find common ground between to the parties' interests
52
Evaluative mediation
an unbiased third party assigns value to each partys side and creates an outcome
53
Arbitration
binding decision, third party acts as a judge to hear both sides and resolves the case
54
Family group conferencing
the stakeholders of a family meet and discuss the best interests of the family and children
55
R v Perka
(defence of necessity) - a storm caused a ship headed for Alaska to stop in BC - BC port officials searched the boat and found large amounts of weed - Perka defence argued that the boat had to stop in BC, to save the lives of the crew members
56
R v Rusek
(defence of duress) - Rusek was caught importing large quantites of heroin from Europe - Rusek defence argued that Rusek was forced to traffick the drugs under threat of her mother's life and rape back in Europe
57
Defence of duress requirements
1. Threats must be of death or serious harm 2. Threats must be serious and realistic 3. Crime must be a reasonable reaction to the threats (reasonable persons test) 4. There was no safe avenue to escape threats 5. Threatened person is not a part of a criminal organization
58
R v Parks
(defence of automatism) - Parks had a serious sleepwalking condition - Parks sleepwalked and drove to his in-laws house and killed his mother in-law - Court ruled Parks was not conscious during the time of the crime and he was acquitted
59
R v Sullivan
(defence of extreme intoxication) - Section 33 (1) of Criminal Code - you are criminally responsible for any crime you commit while extremely intoxicated, even to the point of loss of consciousness - there is an assumed risk that you take on when you choose to get extremely intoxicated
60
R v Hart
(police enticement) - undercover police entices Hart to join a fake criminal organization, to get a confession on the murder of his daughters - Hart confesses to the murders, but he was lying - Mr. Big
61
R v Jordan
(trial time limits) - Jordan was arrested for drug trafficking - Jordan's trial took 49 months, not his fault - Court set new limits for trial wait times - Summary offences: 18 months maximum - Indictable offences: 30 months maximum

Law (7 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2025 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions