Language, Thought and Communication Flashcards
What is Piaget’s theory of language and thought
Piaget’s theory is that we learn through developing schemas and that thought and understanding comes first and then language develops.
The comments about Piaget’s theory of language and thought.
Piaget’s theory of language and thought.
- Thought and understanding first then language.
- Young children can have language without understanding it but can’t use if effectively.
- Sensorimotor: Children start to speak
Pre-operational: Children can talk about things not present.
Concrete operational stage when children develop their own ideas and start developing logical thought.
The Piaget’s theory of language and thought. Evaluation
iaget’s theory of language and thought. Evaluation:
+ supporting evidence: The order of children’s two word phrases show they understanding.
- Sapir-Whorf theory contradicts Piaget, he suggests that language comes first then understanding.
- Schemas cannot be scientifically measured.
What is the Sapir-Whorf Theory
The Sapir Whorf Theory is that you can’t think about something that you have no words for.
Main attributes of the Sapir-Whorf Theory of language and thought.
Main attributes of the Sapir-Whorf theory are:
- Thinking depends on language.
- Strong version: Language determines thought.
- Weak Version: Language influences thought. You can still imagine things with no word for them (preferred version).
- We have limited memory for things we have no words for.
The Sapir Whorf Theory: Evaluation
The Sapir Whorf Theory: Evaluation
- Differences are exaggerated. Inuit may only have 2 words for snow not 27, English has 4. (Pellum)
- thoughts come before language, if there is a lots of snow then this changes the way we perceive the environment which supports Piaget’s theory.
+ restricted and elaborate code: working class children use restricted language which affects their ability to think, explaining lower intelligence (Benstein)
Language and thought. Our view of the world. Name a cultural study and what did it find.
Language and thought. Our view of the world. Native Americans, The Hopi.
The Hopi don’t distinguish between past, present and future. This affects the way they think about time.
Language and thought. Our view of the world. How does language affect our recall of events.
Language and thought. Our view of the world. Language affecting recall of events.
A study by Carmichael et al found that memory for pictures was affected by the labels given.
Language and thought. Our view of the world. Variation in recognition of colours, name two cultural groups studies
Language and thought. Our view of the world. Variation in recognition of colours:
- Native Americans: The Zuni (one word for shades of yellow and orange)
- The Berinmo people of New Guinea (5 words for colours)
Language and thought. Our view of the world. Variation in recognition of colours, The Zuni
Language and thought. Our view of the world. Variation in recognition of colours.
The Zuni only have one word for for shades or orange and yellow and in a research study had difficulty distinguishing them (Brown and Lenneberg)
Language and thought. Our view of the world. Variation in recognition of colours. The Berinmo
Language and thought. Our view of the world. Variation in recognition of colours.
The Berinmo people had difficulty recalling colours except those that matched the five words for colour they have. (Roberson et al)
1 for green, blue and purple 1 for yellow orange and brown 1 for all dark colours 1 for white and light colours 1 for shades of red and pink
Language and thought. Our view of the world. Variation in recognition of colours, evaluation, The Hopi and Berinmo
Language and thought. Our view of the world. Variation in recognition of colours, evaluation, The Hopi and Berinmo
- difficulty with cross-cultural understanding. Participants from other cultures may misunderstand the task or fail to communicate their answers correctly.
- Opposite results found with the Dani people, who had no problem matching colours even though they only had two words for colour (Rosch and Oliver)
Human and Animal Communication:
Name a study on animal behaviour
Karl von Frisch’s bee study
Human and Animal Communication:
What study did Karl von Frisch undertake
Human and Animal Communication:
Von Frisch’s bee study
Human and Animal Communication:
Von Frisch’s bee study, aim, method, result, conclusion
Human and Animal Communication: Von Frisch’s bee study:
Aim: To describe the dances of honey bees to understand their communication.
Method:
Food placed close the the hive 10-20 metres
Food placed further from the hive upto 300 metres.
Observed bees 6k times over 20 years.
Results:
Round dance: moving in a circle to show pollen less than 100m away.
Waggle dance, side ways figure of eight shape points, waggles on the straight section (middle), direction of straight line shows directly. The slower the waggle dance the further away the food.
Conclusion:
sophisticated communication system exists.