Language Concepts and Acquisition Flashcards
L1 and L2 Acquisition
r
Natural Approach
r
Memorization
r
Categorization
r
Generalization
r
Metacognition
r
First and Second Language Effect
r
Idiomatic Expressions
r
First language interference
r
Domain 1 Competency 2
Understand the processes of first-language (L1) and second-language (L2) and the interrelatedness of L1 and L2 development.
Krashen’s Theory
Krashen’s theory of second language acquisition consists of five main hypotheses:
Acquisition-Learning hypothesis, Monitor hypothesis, Natural Order hypothesis, Input hypothesis, Affective Filter hypothesis
Acquisition-Learning hypothesis
Two independent systems of second language performance: ‘the acquired system’ and ‘the learned system’.
This process is very similar to the process children undergo when they acquire their first language, and it requires meaningful interaction in the target language, natural communication.
The ‘learned system’ or ‘learning’ is the product of formal instruction. It is comprised of a conscious process which results in conscious knowledge regarding the language, i.e. knowledge of grammar rules.
Krashen’s opinion is that learning is less important than acquisition.
Monitoring hypothesis
The Monitoring hypothesis function is the result of the learned grammar with sufficient time, focus on correctness, familiarity of the rule. Used only to correct deviations from normal speech and to speech appearing more polished.
Natural Order hypothesis
The Natural Order hypothesis is based on research by (Dulay & Burt, 1974; Fathman, 1975; Makino, 1980 cited in Krashen, 1987) and suggests that the acquisition of grammatical structures follows a predictable “natural order.”
Input hypothesis
Input hypothesis is explained as how a learner acquires a second language. This hypothesis is Krashen’s explanation of how second language acquisition takes place, only concerned with “acquisition”, not “learning”.
Affective Filter hypothesis
Affective Filter hypothesis is the learner’s emotional state and can act as a filter that impedes or blocks input necessary to acquisition. Learners with high motivation, self-confidence, a good self-image, and a low level of anxiety are better equipped for success in second language acquisition.
Scaffolding
A teacher provides individualized support by incrementally improving a learner’s ability to build on prior knowledge.
When using scaffolding as an instructional technique, the teacher provides tasks that enable the learner to build on prior knowledge and internalize new concepts.
Scaffolds may include models, cues, prompts, hints, partial solutions, think-aloud modeling, and direct instruction.
Scaffolding - 8 characteristics
Provide clear direction and reduce students’ confusion. Prior to assigning instruction that involves scaffolding, a teacher must try to anticipate any problems that might arise and write step-by-step instructions for how learners must complete tasks.
Clarify purpose. Scaffolding does not leave the learner wondering why they are engaging in activities. The teacher explains the purpose of the lesson and why this is important. This type of guided instruction allows learners to understand how they are building on prior knowledge.
Keep students on task. Students are aware of the direction in which the lesson is heading, and they can make choices about how to proceed with the learning process.
Offer assessment to clarify expectations. Teachers who create scaffolded lessons set forth clear expectations from the beginning of the activity using exemplars, rubrics.
Point students to worthy sources. Teachers supply resources for research and learning to decrease confusion, frustration, and wasted time.
Reduce uncertainty, surprise, and disappointment. A well-prepared activity or lesson is tested or evaluated completely before implementation to reduce problems and maximize learning potential.
Deliver efficiency. Little time is wasted in the scaffolded lesson, and all learning goals are achieved efficiently.
Create momentum. The goal of scaffolding is to inspire learners to want to learn more and increase their knowledge and understanding.
Zone of proximal development
The gap between what students can do on their own and what requires assistance.