Language and the Brain Flashcards
what is language?
- A System by which sounds, symbols, and gestures are used for communication
- Sensory Process: Auditory (speech), Visual (sign, reading), tactile (tadoma)
- Motor Processes: Produces speech, writing, signs, gestures
- Subsystems of Language: Lexicon, semantics, phonology, morphology, syntax, pragmatics
language vs. speech/sign
-
Language is the abstract representation of the form-meaning mapping through which symbols are converted into meaningful constructions and messages
- Abstract rules for putting together symbols to convey complex meanings about states and events in the world
- The rules must be understood and acquired by all speakers of the language
- Speech or sign is the use of a physical medium to transmit and receive the symbols of language
- Brain areas might be identified for perception or production of speech, or for the abstract representation of grammar
Broca’s and Wernicke’s areas
- Broca’s: BA 44, 45, 46
- Subcortical structures: basal ganglia, thalamus and medial subcallosal fasciculus (nerve bundle under the callosum connecting SMA to anterior cingulate)
- Wernicke’s: BA 22, 41, 42
- Middle temporal, angular gyrus and subcortical structures (basal ganglia & thalamus)

__________ areas are adjacent to Broca’s area
motor

example of Broca’s aphasia speech
“Yes … ah … Monday … er … Dad and Peter (his name) and Dad … er …. Hospital … and ah …. Wednesday … Wednesday, 9 o’clock … and oh … Thursday … 10 o’clock … ah Doctors … two … an doctors … and er … teeth … yah!”
characteristics of Broca’s aphasia speech
- Effortful articulation: Slowness in planning, execution & sequencing of speech
- Anomia (inability to access words) & paraphasias (sound or meaning substitutions)
- Semantic: table for bed
- Phonological: school for stool
- “Telegraphic” speech: Dominated by high content nouns, verbs & adjectives, absence of functors (articles, aux verbs, prepositions, morphological affixes)
- Agrammatism– sometimes evident: comprehension deficit related to failure to access syntactic organization of utterances or sentences
Broca’s aphasia - production and comprehension deficit
- Agrammatism:
- The dog was licked by the cat. Who did was licking?
- The cow that chased the donkey was bitten by the dog. Who bit whom?
- Broca’s aphasia often associated with inability to answer these questions accurately
- Comprehension is not fully represented
- Suggests this is not just a production deficit
Broca’s aphasia - idiomatic language
Idiomatic Language:
- Broca’s aphasics often use overlearned idiomatic phrases (“that’s the way the cookie crumbles”) in substitution for productive language
- Such aspects of language are thought to be strongly represented in Right hemisphere analogue of Broca’s area
impairments associated with Broca’s aphasia
- Dysarthria (neuromuscular speech impairment)
- Verbal apraxia (inability to articulate w/o motor impairment)
- Buccofacial/Oral apraxia (Inability to move oral features in the absence of paresis
- Right hemiparesis or hemiplegia (motor impairment on right half of body), right hemisensory defect (inability to perceive stimulation on right side)
characteristics of Wernike’s aphasia speech
- Speech is fluent (or rapid at least) but often meaningless
- Word salad, jargon, paraphasias
- Contains many functors, but often used inappropriately in long strings with few content words
- Characterized by:
- Limited comprehension of spoken or written language
- “Empty” but fluent speech, depth of meaning is absent
- Poor repetition
- Paraphasias
- Neologisms and jargon (“word-salad”)
- Associated signs: Right hemisensory deficits, right hemianopia (cortical blindness)
example of Wernicke’s aphasia speech
“I feel very well. My hearing, writing been doing well. Things that I couldn’t hear from. In other words, I used to be able to work cigarettes I didn’t know how to be any able to.”
Wernicke-Geschwind Model of Aphasia
Proposed circuit involving:
- Striate (Visual) Cortex
- Broca’s area
- Wernicke’s area
- Arcuate Fasciculus (tract connecting Wernicke’s and Broca’s Areas)
- Angular gyrus

Wernicke-Geschwind Model of Auditory Processsing
Simple repetition task:
- Speech input - auditory cortex
- Meaning of utterance is processed in Wernicke’s area
- Sent to Broca’s area via the arcuate fasciculus
- Processed in Broca’s area for speech production
- Sent to Motor cortex for speech production

Wernicke-Geschwind Model of Reading and Written Language
- Written input - visual cortex
- Converted into sound representation in Angular Gyrus
- Meaning of utterance is processed in Wernicke’s area
- Sent to Broca’s area via the arcuate fasciculus
- Processed in Broca’s area for speech production
- Sent to Motor cortex for speech production

Wernicke-Geshwind model
Role of Arcuate Fasciculus
- Conduction Aphasia
- Lesion of fibers composing arcuate fasciculus
- Comparison with Broca’s aphasia, Wernicke’s aphasia: Comprehension good, speech fluent
- Difficulty repeating words
- Symptoms:
- Repetition task: Substitutes/omits words, paraphasic errors,
- cannot reproduce: functions, nonsense words, polysyllabic words
- Generally taken to support W-G model, since Broca’s and Wernicke’s areas are intact
problems with Wernicke-Geshwind model
- Too simplistic: Circuits are clearly more interconnected than proposed
- Not all written text is converted into phonological representations
- Several thalamic and basal ganglia areas involved in language
- Comprehension vs. Production does not characterize the full complexity of deficits such as agrammatism etc.
aphasia in bilinguals and the deaf
- Aphasia in bilinguals
- Language affected depends on: Order of acquisition, fluency in each language, how often language is used
- Sign language aphasias
- Analagous to speech aphasias - but can be produced by lesions in slightly different locations
- Case Study: Verbal and sign language aphasia in same person
- Both aphasias recovered together - indicating common regions used for both media
- Evidence suggests some universality to language processing in the brain and abstract linguistic representations independent of modality
Asymmetrical Language Processing in the Cerebral Hemispheres
- Paul Broca originally postulated Left Hemisphere was responsible for language production
- Wada test (Anesthetization of one hemisphere using sodium amytal injected into carotid artery) shows loss of speech in dominant hemisphere
- 90% are right handed
- 96% of right handers are left dominant for language
- 70% of left handers are also left dominant for language
- = 96% of all people are left dominant for language
split brain studies
- Roger Sperry studied split-brained monkeys in 1950s
- Severed axons in the corpus callosum
- No major deficits at first sight
- With proper experiments, discovered that animals behaved as if they had 2 brains
- Language Processing in Split-Brain Humans
- Gazzaniga: Present stimuli to one hemisphere
- Two hemispheres initiated conflicting behaviors

left hemisphere language dominance
- Words to Right visual field - Repeated easily
- Words to Left visual field à Difficulty verbalizing
- Image only in left visual field à Picks correct object w/ left hand, but unable to describe in words
- Unable to describe anything to left of visual fixation point
language functions of the right hemisphere
- Functions of right hemisphere: Read and understand numbers, letters, and short words (nonverbal response)
- Baynes, Gazzaniga, and colleagues: Right hemisphere able to write, but cannot speak
- Right hemisphere: Drawing, puzzles, sound nuances
- Left hemisphere: Language
- Language impairments associated with right hemisphere damage: Prosody, Gesture, Idioms, Connected discourse
anatomical asymmetry and language
- Left lateral (Sylvian) fissure longer and less steep than right
- Geschwind and Levitsky: Left planum temporale larger than right in 65% cases
- Functional human asymmetry: More than 90% humans right-handed
- Animals: Equal numbers of right-handers and left-handers
- Suggests that human handedness might be related to language asymmetry
other asphasias and language pathologies
- Global Aphasias (Broca’s + Wernicke’s)
- Transcortical Aphasias (Watershed areas)
- Dyslexia (reading problems), Alexia (Word blindness)
- Dysgraphia (inability to write)
global aphasia
- Combination of Broca’s and Wernicke’s
- Typically associated with occlusion of main stem of middle cerebral artery (thus, impeding flow in both anterior and posterior branches)

transcortical aphasias
- Generally: Repetition intact, disruption of motor and/or sensory abilities
- Mixed: Broca’s, Wernike’s and Arcuate Fasciculus intact; Destruction of watershed areas surrounding these structures
- Motor: Isolation of Broca’s Area only
- Sensory: Isolation of Wernicke’s area alone
list of aphasias
- Conduction: Fluent Speech, Poor Repetition, Good Comprehension, Poor Naming, No Right-side Hemiplegia, Some Sensory Deficits
- Global: Nonfluent Speech, Poor Repetition, Poor Comprehension, Poor Naming, Right-side Hemiplegia, Sensory Deficits
- Transcortical Motor: Nonfluent Speech, Good Repetition, Good Comprehension, Poor Naming, Some Right-side Hemiplegia, No Sensory Deficits
- Transcortical Sensory: Fluent Speech, Good Repetition, Poor Comprehension, Poor Naming, Some Right-side Hemiplegia, Sensory Deficits
- Transcortical Mixed: Nonfluent Speech, Good Repetition, Poor Comprehension, Poor Naming, Some Right-side Hemiplegia, Sensory Deficits
- Anomia: Fluent Speech, Good Repetition, Good Comprehension, Poor Naming, No Right-side Hemiplegia, No Sensory Deficits
Reading and Writing:
Agraphia, Dysgraphia, Alexia, Dyslexia
- Anterior supramarginal gyrus; Posterior angular gyrus
- Alexia with agraphia (angular gyrus)
