Language Acquisition Flashcards
Speech processing before birth and infants’ perception of phonemes:
Changes in heart rate in response to sound
When you introduce a sound to the baby in the womb,
0ms sound introduced showed:
35 weeks (last weeks of pregnancy)= foetal heart rate change
De Casper & Spence (1986) showed that babies are actively processing speech before birth. They can recognise a story that they have heard while still in the womb.
What is this term known as?
Transnatal Learning
Babies code information in womb before birth
then show recognition outside the womb - post natal period
De Casper & Spence (1986)
12 pregnant women read a passage from The Cat in the Hat 2x per day for last 6 weeks of pregnancy
Story chosen because it has a very regular rhyme:
“But our fish said, “No no!
Make that cat go away!
Tell that Cat in a Hat
You do NOT want to play!”
2/3 days after birth babies were tested for recognition using a sucking response (presure sensitive dummy measures how strong the sucking response is)
Sucking played either a recording of The Cat in the Hat or another (unfamiliar) passage
Babies altered sucking pattern to hear the familiar passage but not the unfamiliar one
Change in sucking occurred irrespective of whether mother or unfamiliar person read The Cat in the Hat (its about what they have heard)
So babies were recognising the story rather than the mother’s voice
Found, increased amount of sucking when hearing familiar book passage, were particularly motivated to suck more
Cannot hear details but can hear base notes of music, rhythem, pitch of voices/sound (rather than actual words) Porosity
when does this change occur where babies can distinguish p from other languages but adults can?
Werker & Tees (1984)
How does language experience shape the infant’s speech perception?
Compared babies from language communities where the phonemes (speech sounds) differed
English
Hindi
E.g. Can English babies discriminate between Hindi /Da/ vs. /da/?
Conditioned headturn paradigm
Whenever there is a change in the auditory stimulus, an electric toy is lit up and activated.
Infants are thus trained to look at the toy whenever they hear a change. (begin to get conditioned)
Then the target items are played, and an observed (who cannot hear the sounds) judges whether the infant heard a stimulus change based on the infant’s actions.
Telling languages apart:
Christophe and Morton (1998)
Presented 2-month-old English babies with two different language comparisons
English vs Japanese (different rhythmical - or prosodic - pattern)
English vs Dutch (more similar in prosody)
What were the findings?
Babies could tell the difference between English and Japanese but not English and Dutch
Babies can use prosody to distinguish languages
Languages with similar prosody are harder to understand
The ability to distinguish languages is particularly useful for infants growing up in multilingual environments as languages have different rules, may mix up and not sort the gramatical rules per language, makes it more coherent/ structured implicitly in the womb
Can infants tell apart different phonemes?
Eimas et al (1971) pioneered the High Amplitude Sucking (HAS) paradigm to test infants’ discrimination of speech sounds
infant is shown same sound stimui again and again gets bored, then show new sound stimuli, then measure response to see if they are interested - by testing sucking rate (evidence they have discriminated between old and new sound between p and b sound
Phase 1: babies aged from 1 to 4 months presented with the single sound /ba/
Babies increased their rate of sucking then their sucking rate settled back to the baseline.
Phase 2: Once the babies had habituated to /b/ a new but similar sound was played.
Half the babies heard a different phoneme /p/
Half heard a variant of /b/
did sucking rate revive?
Babies who heard /p/ increased sucking rate
Babies who heard /b/ did not increase sucking rate
inbuild mechanism for distinguishing language aqusition
What are Phonems?
The smallest sound unit that carry distinctions between one meaning and another e.g. /b/ and /p/
It’s crucial to be able to tell apart different phonemes (e.g. /b/and /p/)
Perceptual narrowing in speech perception:
babies differences in ability to tell appart Phonems in their native language compared to other languages
Newborn babies have the potential to make any phonetic discrimination
Adults do not have this same ability
They are often unable to hear phonetic distinctions that occur in other languages but not their own cannot hear phonetic distinctions in other languages for adults
Babies’ ability to tell the difference between similar phonemes in different languages:
Found?
Ability to differentiate language occurs in the first year of life
babies - 1 are universal babies
What are Phoneme boundaries?
Where a physical parameter, such as voice onset time, changes perception from one phoneme /b/ to another /p/
It’s crucial to perceive different variants of the same phoneme as the same (i.e. to perceive all instances of /p/ sounds as /p should be filtered out by the baby)
Perceptual narrowing of speech in infancy:
Infants are initially universal language perceivers
Language-specific experience provides infants with continuing exposure to native contrasts and no exposure to non-native ones
System becomes fine-tuned to relevant contrasts
Become specialists in the phonology (sounds) , semantics and grammar of their native tongue.
meanings are interpreted better
Why do infants stop perceiving phonetic differences in other languages?
(i.e. why is this beneficial?)
Makes child’s processing ability to make sense of the world more efficient
system becomes intunned to pick up on the most important lingiustic imput
tune out on irrelivant sound info
makes system more efficient
to just focuse on the most important sounds
“Perceptual narrowing” in infancy:
Face processing
6 month old babies can distinguish from monkey faces
Adults: find it easier to distinguish faces from our own race, babies can distinguish faces from own and other races
- ESSAY making system efficient is to do with processing inn general not just language according to the community thy grow up in
Experience of a foreign language can reverse the decline in non-native speech perception (Kuhl et al., 2003)
Chinese Speech Discrimination:
Found?
American infants exposed to Chinese did aswell as Chinese infants:
12 sessions of being exposed to Chinese
naturalistic social interactions only= reversal, decline of improvement