L9: Non-prototypical leadership: Ethical Minorities Flashcards
What did studies about leadership’s etnic protoypes show?
- leaders more likely perceived as white (72%) compared to employees (56%) even in mostly minority ethnicity workforces
what is leadership categorization theory?
recognition based processs
black leaders evaluated more negatively regardless of performance
what does romance of leadership theory posit?
inferentioal (attribtion) based process
success leads to attribution of strong leadership qualities, so black leaders evaluated positively after success
why do they call it the “romance of leadership” theory?
cause when ppl see that a leader is doing a good job, they assume that person is a good leader: they must have the skills & attributes to be a good leader
what is a paradox that black ppl face in the workplace?
black leaders are critized more when unsuccesful (negative leader based stereotypes) and are only partially recognized when successfull (non leader compensatory stereotypes explain away their success)
where do non leader compensatory stereotypes come from?
when a racial minority leader has success a paradox happens:
- based on inference theory we know that if a leader has success then they should have all the leadership qualities
- recognited based process tells us that we but the leader into the black category & the black category doesnt match w the leadership category so they shouldnt be doing a good job
-> paradox -> leads to non-leadeer compensatory stereotypes
ppl come up w positigve non leader traits rather than traditional leadership skills (ex: controlling, humourous, calculating, athentlic etc)
What types of biases exist against ethnic minority leaders?
- negative stereotypes (incompetent, submissive)
- discrimination in hiring & evaluations
- implilcit leadershiup theories (leaders are white)
- lack of recognition for leadership qualities, even when successful
- certain stereotypes (ex self sacrificing) lead to susceptibility to the “glass cliff”
what is the glass cliff effect?
Asian-American leaders perceived as self-sacrificing, appointed during organizational decline/crisis
which sets them up for failure
What is the savior effect?
white leaders are preferred after crises
How can cultural initiatives stimulate ethnic minority leadership?
- open diversity climates increase minority leadership self-efficacy
- valuing multiculturalism (not homogeneity) fosters leadership
What is the business case for diversity?
diverse CEOs & Boards of Directiors:
- boost innovation
- evidence for “power of one” (one minority presence creating change) is weak, but diverse boards linked to governance improvmeents
- broader persepctives
What does “power in numbers” mean?
that in businesses, diversity’s benefist require a “critical mass” of diverse leaders to avoid tokenism, which limits influence
What is tokenism?
practice of making a superficial or symbolic effort to include members of underrepresented or minority groups (like hiring one minority person)
Which factors improve asian american/minority leadership competencies?
- competencies in technical, cultural & social domains
- self perceptions as leaders dev through support & recognition in open climates
- Organizational initiatives promoting leadership aspirations and diversity
How do ethnic minorities have to overcome strategic risk to advance their careers?
racial minorities have to overcome the challenges associated w visibility
pursuit of leadership roles requires overcoming higher standards & intense scrutiny
benefits: recognition & career advancement
pitfalls: high pressure, extreme standards