L4: TFA Rehab and Prosthetic Feet Flashcards
OBJECTIVES:
- ID and special considerations and barriers during rehab of pts w/ a TFA
- Understand the proper alignment and fit of various transfemoral prosthetics to maximize gait and function
- Understand the concept of the TKA line and how its location effects each individual LE joint and subsequent control of the transfemoral prosthetic devices
- ID various prosth. foot components and the advantages and disadv’s of each
Prosth. Feet
Classifications:
-
NON-articulating
- SACH (Solid Ankle Cushioned Heel)
-
Articulating
- Single and Multiaxial (like a joystick)
-
Elastic Heels
- SAFE (Stationary Ankle Flexibility Endoskeletal)
-
Dynamic Response or Energy Storing
- Seattle
- Flex Foot
- Carbon Copy
Dead giveaway for the Multi-Axial foot
O-Ring
This is the foot they have on at first
SACH foot
Solid Ankle Cushioned Heel
SACH Foot
*Non-articulating foot
ADVs vs. Disadvs
- ADVs
- NO moving parts: durable→ little maint.
- Excellent for shock absorb.
- Low $
- Good for temporary prostheses
- Disadvs
- Lack of flex.→ partic for uneven surfaces
- NOT approp. for incd rates of walking or active indiv’s
Good foot for temp. prosth.
SACH
*also good shock absorb
Single Axis Feet
-
Allow 15degs PF (CC)
- compress of rubber bumper post. to axis of prosth.
- rate of PF controlled by bumpers density in LR
-
Allow 5-7degs DF (CC)
- anterior bumper compress. slowing forward mvmt of prosthetic shank
- Incd sag. plane motion
Single Axis Feet
Allows _______ degs PF (CC)
Allows _____degs DF (CC)
15degs PF
5-7degs DF
@ what stage of gait is at leas 5-7degs DF MOST needed?
MSt→TSt
ECC closed chain DF controlling tibia moving on fixed foot
Single Axis Feet
ADVs vs Disadvs
- ADVs
- Stable foot flat pos. earlier in stance
- INCd knee stability reducing knee flex moment
- moves wt. line ANT quicker– less likely to buckle
- Quick adjs to durometer (compression of bumpers)
- Disadvs
- Heavier vs SACH
- more parts=more repairs
Multi-axis/Articulating Designed Feet
**Inv/Eversion→ computerized OR split toe foot
- Bumpers BUT allows for motions in transv and coronal (frontal) planes→ In Add. to sagittal
- Incd inversion, eversion, rotational motion and control
- → better accommodation to changing walk surf’s
- Allows foot to absorb torque forces that would normally translate proximally to RL
Mulit-Axis Feet
*think more Inv/Ev and Rotation — absorbs forces
ADVs vs Disadvs
-
ADVs
- Accommodate to changing terrain
- Reduce torque forces to RL
- Quick adj. to durometer to accommodate indivs wt and function lvl
-
Disadvs
- LESS stable vs nonaxial
- **More deg of freedom===LESS stability
- More parts=more maint.
- heavier
- LESS stable vs nonaxial
Rule of Thumb:
MORE degs of freedom======
LESS stability!!!!!
Elastic Keel Feet
- Elastic keel gradually incs tension from heel strike thru MSt to push-off
- *similar to anatomical feet
- Foot loaded in TSt, inc’ing tension on “plantar bands” placed in keel— creates rigid lever for smooth trans. to swing
Elastic Keel Feet
*think “Plantar bands” one!
ADVs vs Disadvs
-
Adv’s
- SMOOTHER gait pattern bc no mech. rocker motions during Stance
- Flex. of keel eases tasks like stair negot. and inc walking
- Simple design
-
Disadvs
- “spongy feel” → not liked by more active users
Prosthetic feet usually progress to THIS….
Dynamic-Response Feet
Dynamic-Response Feet
-
Need to absorb and store forces during Loading and release these forces in PSw/push-off
- running/jumping
- Mats used in keel combined stiff and flex.
-
Stiffer keel=== LOSS of inv/ev.
- split toe advancements
-
More force on forefoot (running)== greater the material compresses === more energy is stored
- Carbon-graphite material
What is crucial for prosth. foot Rx???
PLOF!!!
What are they going to be doing? Where? Prev activity lvl???
Dynamic-Response Feets
Advs vs. Disadvs
-
ADVs
- BEST option for high demand acts.
- Accommodates quickly to changing grades of terrain and speeds
- Made to order specific to user
-
Disadvs
- Mat. used to make foot stronger often produces feeling of being stiff and unaccommodating
- $$$
Dynamic-Response Feets
VIDEOS!!!
SEE VIDEOS WHEN STUDYING!!!
SLIDE 16
Prosthetic Feet→ Role during Stance phase
Initial Contact
Absorb shock*
Prosthetic Feet→ Role during Stance phase
Initial Contact
Cushioned heel→ SACH
Softer heels vs. Firmer heels
Role→ absorb shock
-
Softer heels
- lighter pts
- allows quicker foot flat stability
- more knee stability
-
Firmer heels
- heavier pts
- slows transfer of wt. midfoot and forefoot
Prosthetic Feet→ Role during Stance phase
Initial Contact
*Absorb shock
- Compression of heel simulates ecc. contract. of DF towards foot flat
- Provides for a normal knee flex moment as gait progresses to LR
Prosthetic Feet→ Role during Stance phase
Midstance
*Accommodation of terrain