L4 - Social Cognition Flashcards
What is naïve psychology?
- Infants find people interesting and pay careful attention to them and learn a good amount about them in the first year
- In the first half of the second year, toddlers begin to show understanding intention, joint attention and intersubjectivity
What are three properties of naïve psychology?
- Invisible mental states: cannot see a desire/belief or other psych concepts
- Psychological concepts are linked to one another in cause-effect relations
- Develop early in life
How do we test infants recognition of others intentions? (Puppet grabbing)
- Showed infants puppet shows to the point of habituation (two objects in particular positions)
- Switch positioning of objects
- If we understand the goal of an action is about the person and the object they are reaching, we should be surprised (look longer) when we reach for a different object
- New goal trials = hand reaches in same position but for different object
- New path trials = hand reaches to new position to grasp the same first object (relationship is maintained)
- If infants recognise someone’s intention is to retrieve a particular object, should look longer at new goal rather than new trials.
- (5/6mo)Infants will look in new goals trials rather than new path trials showing they know people act in goal directed and intentional ways
Emergence of initial action understanding?
- Infants have the ability to produce and understand the intention of grasps changes between 3-6 months
- Born with self-consciousness: they are separate to others and can act in ways to accomplish their goals
- Evidence that experience influences understanding
Do infants understand the differences between people?
- Yes, they have preferences e.g selecting a toy from someone who was holding it who was speaking their language vs not their language
- Accepting cracker from puppet who was nice vs bad at 12 mo
What was the sticky mittens interventions?
- 3 mo. infants who get to play with the toys and they look very interested but they do not pick up the toy
- Gave some infants some velcro mittens and velcro toys to control where the toy goes by reaching, Getting visual info and physical/motor experience (active condition = produces behaviour themselves)
- Control observational condition where infants saw another hand moving the toy without the infant touching it (he doesn’t produce these movements)
- Do infants who gain experience look like the 5/6 mo. those in the active motoric experience looked at new goals.
Do infants recognise the difference between intentional/accidental actions?
- By 14 months, infants imitate intentional but not accidental ones
- Cues like language e.g oops and body language
What are imitation tasks?
- By 18 mo. Infants complete the failed actions of other people e.g trying to pull something apart but the adult slips their fingers
- Infants should pull it apart or imitate the slipping off
- Control was a machine not a human
- The human ones caused the infant to complete the task but the computer ones slipped off
- Machines do not have internal goals so children understand that humans have goals
What is progressive social cognitive knowledge? (what is theory of mind and how does this change over the years)
- Theory of mind = understanding of how the mind works and how it influences behaviour
- Understand connections between peoples desires and their specific actions but show little understanding that beliefs are influential = 2 years
- 3 yo = Understand that desires and beliefs affect behaviour but have difficulty with false-belief problems
- 5yo = find false belief problems very easy: know how reality and internal beliefs may differ from one another
Study for other people’s desire
- 18 mo. Olds distinguish between their own preferences and those of an experimenter when sharing food
- Did child give item that child liked/ experimenter liked?
- 14 mo. Old would give them what they wanted but at 18 mo they gave exp. What exp. wanted
- Able to differentiate between own desires and desires of someone else
What are false beliefs?
- Beliefs are more complex than desires
- Understanding that other people will act in accord with their own beliefs
How to measure false-beliefs? (Not sally-Anne)
- Child shown box with label e.g plasters
- Asked what is inside the box
- Shown it has something diff inside
- Asked what someone would believe was in the box
- Some kids cannot Inhibit the fact that she knows there is something else in the box
What is the Sally-Anne task?
- Sally puts her ball in her basket and leaves the room
- Anne moves the ball from the basket to the box
- Sally returns and kids are asked where sally would look for the ball
- Kids know that the ball is in the box and struggle to imagine that sally would not know
- 4-5 yo answered incorrectly but older children were correct
What prevents children from passing these tasks?
- Language demands are too taxing
- Executive functioning demands are too high - Need to inhibit own knowledge to know others have different knowledge
- Social factors facilitate perspective taking - some are sneaky to siblings etc.
What were the different theoretical perspectives as to why children fail these tests?
- Core knowledge - Humans possess a brain mechanism devoted to understanding others
- Sociocultural theories - family env influences performance on false-belief tasks
- Info-processing - Understanding other people’s minds places demands an info processing skills so social knowledge increases as info processes increases