L26 - PLACEBO & NOCEBO EFFECTS Flashcards
Definition of placebo effect:
- old
- new
- description of placebo & nocebo
Definition – old
- Placebo = as sham / fake treatment which is not able to determine effect
Definition – new
= effects of psychosocial / ritual context around therapy
Different context lead to different clinical outcomes
- Positive context = placebo effects => easing pain
- Negative context = nocebo effects => worsening pain
Psychobiology: different theories proposed
Expectations
Learning
Psychological
Mindset
Genetics
Health subjects vs patients
Expectation theory: description
Expectation: power of words
= belief or anticipation that treatment lead to specific outcomes, which can trigger real physiological & psychological responses based on beliefs
“This therapy will help you”:
> satisfaction
> compliance
< pain
“I don’t know if this therapy will help you”
< satisfaction
< compliance
> pain
Learning theory: description
Learning: typology
Classical conditioning: neutral stimulus associated with natural response
Observational learning: learning occurs through observation & imitation of others
Associative learning: power of previous experience
If previous negative experience with specific / same technique:
< satisfaction
< compliance
> pain
Social learning: power of social contagion / influence
Patient shares experiences in common spaces & clinician assess & manage +/- social contagion:
< satisfaction
< compliance
> pain
Expectation vs learning
Expectation vs learning: 2 sides of same coin
Previous experiences / learning has greater weight in chronic pain compared to patient’s expectation
Mindset theory: description
Mindset: power of perception of side-effects
If clinician said: “little bit of pain after exercise is ok, positive sign”
> satisfaction
> compliance
< pain
If clinician said: “little bit of pain after exercise is not ok, negative, adverse effects”
< satisfaction
< compliance
> pain
Psychological features:
- optimist
- pessimism
Psychological feature: situational, unstable, changeable traits
Power of yellow flags
Optimist:
- Goal seeking
- Self-efficacy
- Locus of control
- Suggestibility
- Fun seeking
- Sensation seeking
- Neuroticism
Placebo responders
Pessimism:
- Anxiety sensitivity & suggestibility
- Social desirability
- Neuroticism
- Pain catastrophizing
- Blunting behavior
- Frail & submissive personality
- Hypervigilance & fear
- Somatization & amplification
Nocebo responders
Genetic theory
Genetics: polymorphisms
Specific genes influence response to placebo or nocebo effects
Health subject’s vs patients
Health subject’s vs patients: response to context is same
Both patients & health individuals respond similarly to placebo treatments, highlighting importance of context in driving placebo effects
Key points of determinants
Key points
- Different psycho-biological determinants have been proposed
- Expectations & learning processes (associative & social) are main determinants
- Genetic, mindset & psychological traits recently proposed as additional determinants
Mechanisms:
- name
- description with + & - context
- key points
Neurophysiology
Positive & negative contexts determine release of neurotransmitters
Implicated network: DLPC, ACC, PAG, Spine (major areas)
IMAGE
Key points
- Opioids system, endocannabinoid, dopamine, oxytocin / vasopressin implicated in placebo /
positive context
- Cholecystokinin, dopamine / opioid deactivation, cyclooxygenase-prostaglandins implicated in nocebo/negative context
- Despite different areas implicated in placebo / nocebo effects, key regions are: DLPF, ACC,
PAG and dorsal horn
Confounders:
- definition
- other sources of recovery or aggravation
- key points
Confounders = variable influencing relationship between independent variable & dependent variable, leading to misleading conclusions
- Not all patient’s clinical changes due to placebo/nocebo effects
Other sources of recovery or aggravation
- Natural history of disease
- Regression to mean
- Biases by clinicians & patients
- Unidentified co-interventions
- Adverse side-effects in placebo group in RCT
Key points
- Not all clinical improvements / worsening depends on placebo & nocebo effects
- Natural history, regression to mean, co-interventions, prejudices o patient & clinician,
represent cofounders
Contextual factors: outcomes:
- definition
- therapeutic outcomes: 5 domain & description
- clinical relevance
Definition
= context represents whole atmosphere around therapy
Therapeutic outcome – 5 domains
a) Physiotherapist’s features
- Professionalism
- Mindset
- Appearance
- Beliefs & behavior
b) Patient’s features
- Expectation
- Preferences
- Previous experience
- MSK conditions
- Gender
- Age
c) Patient-physiotherapist relationship
- Verbal communication
- Non-verbal communication
d) Treatment features
- Therapeutic touch
- Modality
- Posology
- Marketing
- Clear diagnosis
- Overt therapy
- Observational learning
- Patient-centered approach
- Global process of care
e) Healthcare setting features
- Positive distractors
- Supportive indications
- Environment: Comfort element
- Architecture interior design: Decorations & ornaments
Clinical relevance
Therapeutic outcome = specific treatment (active & biological) + psychosocial context
Greater effect on illness component (subjective outcomes)
Minor effect on disease component (objective outcomes)
Illness: person’s subjective experience of symptoms. What patient brings to
doctor
Disease: underlying pathology, biologically defined, practitioner’s perspective.
Illness seen in terms of theory of disorder
Sickness: social & cultural conceptions of condition: cultural beliefs & reactions such as fear or rejection, these affect how patient reacts. Also covers what is considered disorders suitable for medical
treatment
30% of outcome it has historically been associated with context
Contextual effect varies from large to small due to characteristics of patient, practitioner, condition,
intervention & metric used
Prefrontal lobe injury Alzheimer’s disease
Key points on outcomes
Key points
- Context influences all clinical conditions with different weight
- In “non-lifesaving” pathologies greater effect, while in “Lifesaving” pathologies a limited effect
- Subjective outcomes more influenced by context compared to objective outcomes
Contextual factors: clinical reasoning:
- patient’s role: description, different needs
Is a non-linear adaptative complex system
Creates perceptions of symptoms through context
Has perceptions +/- based on congruence / incongruence of context
- Previous + patient’s expectations
- Interaction with positive context
- Positive final healthcare experience
> Congruence = placebo effects
- Previous + patient’s expectation
- Integration with negative context
- Negative final healthcare experience
< Congruence = nocebo effects
Seeks answers to cognitive & emotional needs in physiotherapy
TABLE