L16: Public Goods Flashcards
pure public goods
non-rival in consumption and non-excludable
non-rival: one individual’s consumption does not affect another’s opportunity to consume
non-excludable: individuals cannot be denied the opportunity to consume a good
impure public goods
goods that satisfy the two public good conditions (non-rival in consumption and non-excludable) to some extent, but not fully
optimal provision of public goods (samuelson rule)
with public goods, no rivalry and consumption so we want to sum the valuations of how much people value the good and how much the good is worth
social-efficiency maximising quantity is when MC = the sum of MRS, rather than being set equal to each individual MRS
private sector underprovision and free rider problem
market produces less than the efficient amount of public goods because of the free rider problem
when investment has a personal cost but common benefit, individuals underinvest
- private provision by any individual has a positive externalities so goods with positive externalities are underprovided
can private provision exist?
for small numbers, cooperation and peer pressure
for large numbers, free riding is severe and cooperation is difficult
how to explain charitable contributions?
tax benefits
private benefits
altruism and warm glow
crowding out of private contributions
if individuals choose to give more than taxed by the government, they act as if the required payments are the first part of contributions, so government provision only has an effect if individuals are required to pay more than they contribute on their own
excludable public goods
goods that are nonrival but excludable
- private provision is possible since there is no longer a free rider problem
- those who don’t contribute can be excluded from consumption
trade off where private companies don’t care about well-being but respond to market signals
- with only government provision, no market signals if goods are provided for free
private provision vs private production
public provision where the government pays but doesn’t have to produce it
contracting out: government retains responsibility but hires private firms to provide the good/service
- controversial when we think about private security, prison, garbage services, etc.
advantages and disadvantages of contracting
potentially lower costs due to competitive bidding
greater expertise due to specialisation
private sector incentives do not align with public goals, leading to lower public costs and possibly worse outcomes