L12- Social factors in health promotion Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

examples of health promotion in the UK

A
  • Change for life
  • Start for life
  • Couch to 5k
  • Be clear on cancer
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

5 types of health promotion in action

A
  1. Medical or preventative
  2. Behaviour change
  3. Educational
  4. Empowerment
  5. Social change
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

medical or preventative

A
  • Clinical approach to promoting health

* E.g. giving advice on the benefits of stopping smoking

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

behaviour change

A

.g. using shocking images and clever catch phrases
• Very brief advice on smoking (for doctors- so they can take part in the intervention)
• Motivational interviewing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

educational

A

Giving people the facts on the easiest way to give up an unhealthy behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

empowerment

A
  • Make people feel in control of stopping whatever unhealthy behaviour they want to quit
  • E.g. smoke free app
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

social change

A
  • Not acceptable to smoke in many places- social sanction around smoking
  • Seen less often- less socially acceptable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

sociological perspectives

A

structural

surveillance

consumption critiques

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

structural critiques

A

material conditions that give rise to ill health are marginalised
o Focus on individual responsibility may miss the point

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

surveillance critiques

A

monitoring and regulating population- is that okay??

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

consumption critiques

A

lifestyle choices not just seen as health risks but also tied up with identity construction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

dilemas of health promotion

A

1) should we intervene in peoples lives?
2) Victim-blaming: whos fault is poor health?
3) Fallacy of empowerment
4) Reinforcing negative stereotypes
5) Unequal distribution of responsibility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

1) should we intervene in peoples lives?

A
  • Potential psychological impact of health promotion messages.
  • State intervention in individuals like ‘Nanny’ state —> rights and choice
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

2) Victim-blaming: Who’s fault is poor health?

A

Health promotion often focuses on individual behavioural change

  • Structural and socioeconomic changes are not often factored in
  • Plays down the impact of wider socioeconomic an environmental determinant of health
  • E.g. housing conditions, water and air quality, workplace conditions, roads, green spaces
  • All of the above influence the perceptions individuals have on their health and the choices they make
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

3) The fallacy of empowerment

A
  • Giving people generic information about unhealthy behaviours will not necessarily make them do it
  • Info does not give automatic power to act on healthier choices
    o e.g. cost of doing a healthy behaviour
    o e.g. join a gym if inactive
  • Unhealthy lifestyles almost never due to ignorance, but due to adverse circumstances and wider socio-economic determinants of health
    o e.g. mums who don’t breast feed because they need to earn money and work
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

4) Reinforcing negative stereotypes

A
  • Health promotion can reinforce negative stereotypes associated with a condition or group
    o e.g. leaflets aimed at HIV prevention in drug users
17
Q

5) Unequal distribution of responsibility

A
  • Implementing healthy behaviours in the family is often left up to the women
  • Example: healthy eating advice and the responsibility to their family to eat more fresh fruit etc
  • Women are often left to implement promotions that require work in the home as we know women still do
18
Q

the prevention paradox

A

Interventions that make a diff at population level might not have much effect on the individual

19
Q

lay beliefs and the prevention paradox

A
  • If people don’t see themselves as a candidate for a disease they may not take on board the health promotion messages
  • Awareness of anomalies and randomness of a disease will also impact on views about candidacy
  • Importance of health promoters engaging with lay beliefs
  • e.g. anti-vaxxers do not understand why we vaccinate for diseases that don’t exist in the UK anymore- lack of understanding of heard immunity
20
Q

why evaluate health promotion

A
  • We need evidence based interventions
  • Properly conducted evaluation studies can provide necessary evidence
  • Accountability
  • Evidence also gives legitimacy to interventions and political support
  • Ethical obligation
  • The imperative to ensure there is no direct or indirect harm
  • Programme management and development
21
Q

types of health promotion evaluation

A

process eval

impact

outcome

22
Q

process evaluation

A
  • Assessing the process of programme implementation

* Employ wide range of mainly qualitative methods

23
Q

impact

A
  • Assess the immediate effects of the intervention

* Popular choice- easiest to do

24
Q

Outcome

A

Measure more long-term consequences ◦Measures what is achieved:
• Improvement in clients lives
• Reduction of symptoms
• Level of harm reduction
• Timing of eval can influence outcome: delay- sometime interventions might take a long time to have an effect
• Decay: some interventions wear off rapidly

25
Q

difficulties with evaluation

A

Demonstrating an attributable effect is difficult because:

  • Design of the intervention
  • Lag time to effect
  • Many potential intervening or concurrent confounding factors
  • High cost of evaluation research-studies are likely to be large scale and long term