L12 - Intergroup Relations Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What are the dual process models of social cognition?

A
  • Social info can be processed In different ways
  • Automatic: unintentional, effortless, outside conscious awareness
  • Controlled: intentional, effortful, within conscious awareness
  • Implicit vs explicit stereotypes and prejudice
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Why are explicit measures not always reliable?

A
  • Social desirability/ impression management concerns
  • Prejudice and stereotypes can be hidden
  • To measure implicit automatic stereotypes and prejudice: IAT
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What was early evidence with explicit measures?

A
  • Don’t correlate highly with behaviour discrimination
  • Measure of racially prejudiced attitudes given to 250 white college students
  • 23 highest and lowest scoring participants selected
  • Had a behavioural measure: willingness to be photographed with a black person of opposite sex, photographic release form from 0-7
  • Correlation between attitudes and behaviour was 0.4, shows unpredictability esp with instruments to detect prejudice
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What was an exp showing the IAT with prejudice?

A
  • Black vs white, Pleasant vs unpleasant, White/pleasant & Black/unpleasant, Black vs white, Black/Pleasant & White/Unpleasant
  • Compare Reaction times for block 3&5
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is good about implicit measures?

A
  • Provides new insights in stereotypes and prejudice
  • Shows automatic and uncontrolled processes
  • Demonstrates people have subtle stereotypes or prejudices they would deny having
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is critical evaluation of implicit measures?

A
  • Measures automatic associations
  • Results are not always consistent between measures or over time
  • Measures can be influenced by context
  • Small effects for predictive behaviour
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was a study for Automatic Object Recognition?

A
  • White ppts had to identify had tools and handguns
  • Each photo preceded by a white/black face
  • Faster to detect handgun when preceded by black face, faster to detect hand-tool when preceded by a white face
  • STUDY UPGRADE: 4 types of target stimuli: positive/negative, related to stereotype/not
  • Faster recognition of stereotypical item, positive and negative
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was a study? (Video game)

A
  • Ppts have to shoot when someone has a gun in hand (game)
  • False alarms: mistake on unarmed trial, ppts did so more often for black targets rather than white targets
  • Misses: mistake on armed individual, ppts did more for white target than black target
  • Effects were pronounced when the background is threatening as black people have more stereotypically African features.
  • Study replicates with black participants or when targets wear Islamic head covering
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What was a study that compared implicit/explicit measures?

A
  • White ppts measured for implicit/explicit attitudes toward Black people
  • Interacted with a white/black student
  • Verbal and non-verbal friendliness during interactions coded through audiotapes/videotapes
  • Explicit measures predicted verbal friendliness but not non-verbal friendliness
  • Implicit measures predicted non-verbal friendliness (automatic behaviour) BUT not verbal friendliness
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What did Devine do?

A
  • Dissociation model of stereotyping where automatic and controlled components of stereotypes and prejudice
  • Knowledge about stereotypes is culturally shared
  • Activation is automatic
  • However automatic activation of stereotypes does not inevitably lead to a stereotypical or prejudiced responding or discrimination: low prejudiced people engage in controlled processes to inhibit automatic stereotypes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What was Devine’s first study? (Knowledge of Stereotypes)

A
  • Measured levels of prejudice with modern racism scale
  • Ppts listed knowledge of content of cultural stereotypes regardless of personal beliefs
  • RESULTS: few differences between individuals high and low in prejudice, BUT most common theme was hostility and aggression SO knowledge of stereotypes is independent of prejudice
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What was Devine’s second study? (Activation of Stereotypes is automatic)

A
  • Measured levels of prejudice with Modern racism scale
  • Ppts were flashed words outside of their direct line of vision, some words related to stereotypes, some neutral
  • Proportion of stereotype-related words differed between subjects e.g 80-20%
  • Then ppts read a scenario describing ambiguous hostile behaviour
  • Ppts who saw a high proportion of stereotype words rated person as more hostile, TRUE for ppts high and low in prejudice
  • Activation of stereotypes is automatic
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What was Devine’s third study? (Activation of stereotypes can be overcome)

A
  • Measured levels of prejudice with Modern racism scale
  • Ppts listed as many alternative labels as possible for black Americans
  • Ppts listed their honest thoughts under anonymous conditions
  • No difference in proportion of derogatory labels
  • Ppts high in prejudice listen more negative traits, ppts low in prejudice listed more positive beliefs
  • Automatic stereotypes cannot be overcome but activation can
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are Group level explanations?

A
  • Economic perspective: Robbers Cave Study & Realistic group conflict theory
  • Motivational perspective: Minimal Group Paradigm & Social Identity Theory
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What was the Robbers Cave Study?

A
  • Summer camp in 1954 with 22 11-yo-boys split into 2 groups
  • Average in nearly every aspect e.g intact families, no problems with school, similar education and socio-economic backgrounds & no ethnic differences
  • No prior history for intergroup hostility
  • Competition for goals that only one can achieve is sufficient for intergroup hostility through zero-sum conflict and negative interdependence
  • Competition against outsiders increases ingroup cohesion
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the economic perspective?

A

Stereotypes, prejudice and discrimination result from competition over scarce resources

17
Q

What is the realistic group conflict theory?

A
  • Prejudice and discrimination arise from competition over limited resources SO economic difficulty increases prejudice and discrimination AND it is strongest from groups who stand to lose the most
  • Ethnocentrism: ingroup glorified = increased loyalty BUT outgroup is vilified = more stereotyping and maltreatment
18
Q

What is the Frustration-aggression Theory?

A
  • Frustration leads to aggression
  • Source of frustration can become target of aggression through realistic conflict theory and relative deprivation - lots of displaced aggression e.g antisemitism
  • Negative correlation between price of cotton and lynching in south of US
19
Q

What is the motivational perspective?

A

Prejudice results from motivations to view one’s ingroup more favourably than outgroups e.g boys in Robber Cave did not need competition to make negative references to the other group

20
Q

What is the minimal group paradigm? (With exp)

A
  • Minimal conditions for discrimination to occur
  • Ppts are categorised according to arbitrary, minimally important similarities and real rewards are allocated without personal gain e.g you like this painting vs other
  • EXT: For each round of the game, there was something to be won, people had to divide the game between ingroup and outgroup and were presented with proportions how the money was to be distributed between ingroup and outgroup
  • Some proportions show ingroup/outgroup favouritism, if you wanted to maximise ingroup, you should select the highest in group proportion, but some people choose the maximum difference even if it is lower for the ingroup
  • Maximum difference was preferred even at the cost of ingroup profit e.g 45 & 15 vs 60 & 45
21
Q

What did Tajfel find?

A
  • Many adopt fairness strategy
  • More maximum differentiation than maximum ingroup profit
  • Minimal group discrimination occurs without conflict of interests - DIFFERENT from what realistic conflict theory predicts
22
Q

What is social identity theory?

A
  • Maximum differentiation that reveals antagonistic intergroup relations EVEN at the expense of the ingroup as it serves as group interest
  • Need for a conceptualisation of the self at the group level
  • Social identity is a part of self-concept derived from group membership and value/emotional significance associated with this group membership
23
Q

What is Social Identity Theory? pt2

A
  • People strive for positive group identity and group worth
  • People compare their own group with other groups
  • People seek differentiation from other groups positively
  • Positive differentiation: making group positively different from comparison outgroup on available dimension
  • Ingroup bias does not reflect discrimination but differentiation