L04 - Origins of Self-Knowledge Flashcards
What are the prerequisites for self-knowledge?
1. Self-awareness
- we are not born understanding that our self is separate from other people
- emerges aroung 18 months old
– Pass Rouge Test
- By age 4, children undersand that they have private access to the self in that others don’t have access to their thinking
2. Perspective-taking
- imagining others’ responses helps the child to acquire the ability to look at themsevles “from the outside”
- can then draw conclusions about self
- develops around age 5
– Pass False Belief problems (smarties task)
Describe the findings of the False Belief Problem.
(Smarties task)
3 year olds fail: incorrectly think that other children will know that there are pencils inside the box + say that they always knew there were pencils in the box
5 year olds pass: correctly say that others will think that there are Smarties inside the box
What are the intrapersonal sources of self-knowledge?
Self-perception: we observe our overt behaviours and use these observations to infer what we’re like
- similar to how we infer what other people are like
Introspection: we direct our attention inwards to our internal states (thoughts and feelings) and use this self-awareness to draw conclusions about what we are like
Describe Andersen & Ross’ study on internal states vs. behaviour (1984).
Do people prioritize awareness of internal states or overt behaviour to construct self-knowledge?
Method: 40 undergrads
- how useful are different sources of information for someone to get to know what you are really like (1-11 scales)?
– seeing overt behaviour for a day
– seeing overt behaviour for several months
– knowing thoughts and feelings for a day
– knowing thoguht and feelings for several months
– interviews with friends and family
prioritization of internal states
- people report that knowing their internal states is better for understanding the self than knowing their behaviour or interviewing close ones
Describe Andersen’s study on access to others’ internal states (1984)
How does access to internal states vs. behaviour shape others’ impressions?
Method: 60 Ps
- listened to interviews with strangers describing themselves
- assigned to 1 of 3 conditions
– Cognitive/affective: interviewee describing past thoughts and feelings
– Behavioural: interviewee describing past behaviour
– Control: interviewee describing mix of past thoughts, feelings, and behaviour
- Formed impression of interviewee by rating them on a personality measure
– compared these to interviewee’s self-ratings and to interviewee’s close friends’ ratings
cognitive/affective interviews produced impressions that are most in line with interviewee’s self-ratings and with close friends’ ratings
suggests that knowing thoughts and feelings is most useful for knowing someone well
What does prioritizing internal states imply?
people prioritize awareness of their thoughts and feelings (vs. behaviours) to construct self-knowledge and beleive this is most revealing of what others are like
- why?
– recognize that actions can be influenced by external factors so think that thoughts and feelings are more revealig of inner self
self-perception may be more useful for forming self-knowledge wehn people are unclear about their internal states
assumption that introspection is useful source of self-knowledge is shared by much of psychology research which relies on self-report
Describe Wilson et al.’s study on accuracy of introspection (1982).
Are people aware of what impacts their mood?
Method: 55 undergrads
- daily diary study for 5 weeks
- every evening rated (1 = very bad, 7 = very good)
– overall mood
– several predictors of mood: e.g., the weather, relationships with friends, workload, amount of exercise, # of hours of sleep the night before
- at the end of the study
– Ps estimated the relationship between their mood and each predictor (e.g., how do you think sleep affected your mood?)
– 22 additional observers also estimated the relationship between mood and each predictor (based on theories about mood, not by looking at Ps’ data)
– researchers calculated actual correlation between mood and each predictor (compared these with Ps’ and observers’ estimates)
Results:
- average within-participant accuracy correlation = 0.42
– shows that Ps made fairly accurate judgements about how various predictors influenced their mood
– but also indicates that Ps made quite a few errors (49% of subjects got the direction of at least one estimate backwards)
- average accuracy correlation for observer = 0.46
– shows that observers were just as accurate judges of predictors of mood as were the Ps themselves
suggests that people don’t have real, unique understanding of their mood, but isntead rely on shared theories about predictors of mood
What does accuracy of introspection imply?
people don’t have a genuine understnading of why they think and feel the way they do
- internal processes are heavily influenced by automatic and unconscious processes
introspection may be more useful for describing intenral states, but not very useful for explaining why we have these in the first place
- Wilson (2002): suggests that people should take psychology courses if they want to understand themselves rather than relying on introspection
What is symbolic interactionism?
Symbolic interactionism: the self-concept depends on our social interactions
- there is no self wihtout others
What are the interpersonal sources of self-knowledge?
- Social comparison
- Looking-glass self
- Social groups we belong to
- including close others in the self
What is social comparison?
We compare ourselves with others to form conclusions about our relative standing on attributes, abilities, opinions, etc.
- e.g., you can only conclude that you’re introverted by comparing yourself to others on introversion
- introspection and self-perception often rely on comparison
How does social comparison relate to self-esteem?
We tend to engage in social comparison automatically
- direction of comparison influences self-esteem
– Upward: comparing ourselves to people that are better than us which leads to a decrease in sef-esteem
– Downward: comparing ourselves to people that are worse than us which leads to an increase in self-esteem
sometimes, we engage in social comparison strategically
- downward comparisons can help us feel better in difficult situations by focusing on people who are worse off
- upward comparisons can inspire us when wanting to improve ourselves
What is the looking-glass self?
We construct our self-concept based on how others see us
- infer how others see us using:
– their direct feedback
– their behaviours towards us (e.g., facial expressions, sighs, etc.)
- not just close others, but also how others generally see us
How do researchers evaluate looking-glass self?
Research examining looking-glass self compares (correlates):
- Ps’ self-report of their own personality/behaviour
- Observers’ reports of Ps’ personality/behaviour
– strangers or close ones
if looking-glass self theory is true, would expect a high correlation between self-report and observer report
What are problems with the looking-glass self?
literature review of looking-glass self research shows that there is no consistent relationship between self-reports and observer reports
BUT, there is a strong relationship between people’s self-reports of their own personality and how they think they are perceived by others