Kidnapping/Abduction

Question 1

Abduction
S208(a), CA1961

Answer 1

U
TA/D
AP
WTC/WCOBFOD
WIT
(a)GTAFOMOCU

Question 2

Abduction
S208(b), CA1961

Answer 2

U
TA/D
AP
WTC/WCOBFOD
WIT
(b)HSCWTP

Question 3

Abduction
S208(c), CA1961

Answer 3

U
TA/D
AP
WTC/WCOBFOD
WIT
(c)CTPTGTAFOM/CU/THSCWSOP

Question 4

Kidnapping
S209(a), CA1961

Answer 4

U
TA/D
AP
WTC/WCOBFOD
WIT
(a)HHOHFR/TS

Question 5

Kidnapping
S209(b), CA1961

Answer 5

U
TA/D
AP
WTC/WCOBFOD
WIT
(b)CHOHTBC/I

Question 6

Kidnapping
S209(c), CA1961

Answer 6

U
TA/D
AP
WTC/WCOBFOD
WIT
(c)CHOHTBSOTOONZ

Question 7

Abduction of a YP < 16
S210(1), CA1961

Answer 7

WITD:AP/G/OPHTLCOCOAYP
OTPOTYP
U:TA/EA/D
TYP

Question 8

Abduction of a YP < 16
S210(2), CA1961

Answer 8

R
AYP
KTHOSHB:UTA/EA/D
WITD:AP/G/OPHTLCOCOHOHOTPOHOH

Question 9

R v Crossan

Answer 9

Taking away and detaining are separate and distinct offences.

Question 10

R v Wellard

Answer 10

Taking away is the deprivation of liberty coupled with carrying away from where the victim wants to be.

Question 11

R v Pryce

Answer 11

Detaining is an active concept meaning to keep in confinement or custody.

Question 12

R v Cox
(Possession)

Answer 12

Possession involves two elements.
1) Physical - actual or potential physical custody or control.
2) Mental - combination of knowledge and intention.

Knowledge is the sense of an awareness by the accused that the substance is in his possession and an intention to exercise possession.

Question 13

R v Forrest and Forrest

Answer 13

The best evidence possible in the circumstances should be adduced by the prosecution in proof of age.

Question 14

R v Mohi

Answer 14

The offence is complete at the time of the taking away, provided the necessary intent is contemporaneous.

Prosecution need not prove the intent was carried out.