Key Research: Memon and Higham - A Review of the Cognitive Interview Flashcards
What 4 sections was Memon and Higham’s research split into?
- The Effectiveness of the 4 Components of the CI Technique
- Comparison of CI to Other Interview Techniques
- Measures of Memory
- Quality of Training
What is the aim of Memon and Higham’s research?
To review present theoretical and methodological issues that they believed needed to be considered when researching the cognitive interview.
In Memon and Higham’s research, what were the findings of the Effectiveness of the 4 Components of the CI Technique?
- Problem with recalling from variety of perspectives is that there is the possibility it may lead to the witness fabricating data, and it might confuse the witness
- A study found it’s more effective to recall in forward order than reverse order
- Another study found no significant difference between 3 of the groups in this section
In Memon and Higham’s research, what were the findings of the Comparison of the CI to Other Interview Techniques?
- CI leads to improved memory compared with other techniques
- Standard interview can’t be compared as is too variable between interviews
- CI interviews may elicit more info
- Guided Memory Interview (GMI) uses context reinstatement - could be a good comparison
In Memon and Higham’s research, what were the findings of the Measures of Memory?
- Previous research looks at number of correct/incorrect details but fails to look at amount and detail about unreported information
- The ‘recall everything’ component in CI can be more effective as they are encouraged to report everything
In Memon and Higham’s research, what were the findings of the Quality of Training?
- Previous training varied from reading from handout to 4 hours of training
- Research highlighted need for better training
- Suggested 2 day training programme and should be trained by potential (identify good interviewers first)
What are the main conclusions of Memon and Higham’s study?
- Context reinstatement seems to be most effective
- CI cannot be compared to the interview effectively - use GMI or SI
- Future research needs to look at unreported information and not just what they remembered
- Officer training on CI needs to be improved