kantian ethics Flashcards
what is kantian ethics’ made of
deontological, rationality, good will,
definition of the categorical imperative
an unconditional moral obligation which is binding in all circumstances - i ought to do this
what is a maxim
refers to a person’s intention for actions
kant’s deontological approach
moral value is not judged by the consequences of the act but by the act itself. we are all obligated to act morally and so obey the moral law irrelevant of consequences. certain acts are intrinsically good and bad
rationality
knowledge of moral laws can be gained through reason.
kant background context
his approach was typical of the enlightenment period of 18th century europe, which was known as the age of reason.
what is an imperative
something that must be done
what is a hypothetical imperative
an action considered as right depending upon a condition and takes the form of i ought to do X if it will bring Y
kant’s 1st categorical imperative
formula of the law of nature - whereby a maxim can be established as universal law.
some actions can be right/wrong despite the culture/circumstance at the time eg rape, or slavery which are always bad.
kant’s 2nd categorical imperative
formula of the end in itself - whereby people are treated as the ends in themselves not a means to an end.
Kant believed humans were the pinnacle of creation, therefore it can never be moral to exploit people to use them as a means to an end.
contrasts teleological thinking where the ends justify the means
kant’s 3rd categorical imperative
formula of the kingdom of ends - whereby a hypothetical ideal society of rationality is established
we should only include maxims that we would be willing to live by in a kingdom.
what is the summum bonum
the highest good - where true virtue, duty and happiness come together.
what are kant’s three postulates
- freedom - an action is only moral if that choice has been made freely rather than coerced.
- immortality - experience tells us that virtuous actions are not always rewarded by happiness, they may attract criticism or pain. since it is logical that perfect virtue ought to result in perfect happiness, it must exist - if it doesnt happen in this life, God must grant it to us in the next life.
- God - if there is another life in which humans can achieve immortality - then God is the necessary connection between virtue and happiness.
kant is good
- clear
- secular
- not based on fleeting emotion + personal/national self-interest.
-human rights!
kant is bad
- inflexible eg stealing bread
- doesnt escape God - 3 postulates
- assumption of people’s capacity to reason
- conflicting duties - absolutism
- described as abstract form reality