Jensen Flashcards
1
Q
Definition of intelligence?
A
- the aggregate or global capacity of the individual to act purposefully, to think rationally, and to deal effectively with his environment
- intelligence quotient (IQ)
2
Q
What is the measurement of IQ?
A
- performance on intelligence tests is compared to population distribution
- norm: mean of 100, sd of 15
- 68% of the population have IQ between 85-115
- 95% of population have IQ between 70-130
- 99.7% of population have IQ between 55-145
3
Q
What did Jensen (1968) find?
A
- low SES children with low IQ measures outperformed middle/upper SES european-american children on paired association task and serial learning task
- IQ and learning: IQ correlated with learning scores in mid/high SES but not low
- discrepancy: IQ tests often include items that assess cultural learning, children from low SS families are disadvantaged
- culture-free tests: particularly large differences between group correlations in Raven’s Progressive Matrices, peabody picture vocabulary test is on receptive vocabulary so may be bias in language, culture, and context
4
Q
What are genetics?
A
- races: populations with different distributions of genes
- genetic differences manifest in virtually all anatomical, physiological and biochemical comparisons to date
- geographical/social isolation increases genetic differences
5
Q
What is heritability?
A
- the proportion of variation in a trait in a population that can be attributed to genetic differences
- genetic and environmental influences should not be considered independent of each other
- can vary substantially from one environment to another
- is a population statistic and doesn’t apply to individuals
- level of heritability in 1 group doesn’t mean its level will be the same in other groups
- high heritability doesn’t mean a trait is immutable
6
Q
What did the review consist of and find?
A
- 123 page review of recent research and debate
- research question: understand the discrepancy between the IQ and achievement in low/high SES
- main argument: open up genetics as a potential avenue of research into IQ differences
- differences in general intelligence: african-american IQ distribution is 15 IQ points below distribution of european-americans. african-american variance in IQ is smaller than european-american variance. partial genetic influence on these differences had been strongly denounced but not contradicted/ discredited empirically
7
Q
What is the issue with biased commentaries?
A
- article published with 9 commentaries
- next edition of HER had 5 more rebuttals
- all offered limitations of the argument but overlooked data
- Jensenism (belief that african-american are mentally inferior)
8
Q
What is the scientific truth?
A
- Jensen strongly disagreed that science should be sued to search for truth only in certain circumstances
- claimed it’s why the discussion of the possibility of genetic determination of racial differences in test scores has stopped
- just if something is ‘socially inappropriate’ doesn’t make it immune to scientific scrutiny, it may make it more necessary
9
Q
What is the Flynn effect?
Flynn, 1987
A
- worldwide intelligence test scores rise by 3 points per decade
- even with different test types an din different world regions
- explanations: genetic changes of this magnitude are extremely unlikely at this pace, suggests cultural/environmental influence in test scores
10
Q
What are culture-free tests of intelligence?
A
- if Raven’s Progressive Matrices is ‘culture-free’ then concern over why some cultures/SES groups consistently outperform others
- Raven test scores have shown some of the largest gains over time (Flynn effect)
- original progressive matrices now only used for children
- adults tend to score perfectly
- undermines Jensen’s reasons for assuming genetic source of gap
11
Q
What is the stereotype threat?
A
- knowledge of traits associated with low scores tend to reduce the scores in people who have those traits
- reminding women about their gender before a maths test leads to lower maths performance
- reminding African-Americans about their ethnic background leads to lower performance on intelligence tests
12
Q
What is the most current understanding of genetics?
A
- now genetic influence on almost all behavioural traits is accepted
- genetic research is done on large scale: whole genome, millions of genetic markers, thousands of individuals
- gene action is very complicated
- IQ is complex and highly polygenic
- many potential loci but small effects and rarely replicate
- current understanding of genetics makes it difficult to conclude that high heritability of traits indicate mean differences in group performance
13
Q
What impact did it have on interventions?
A
- Jensen’s paper focused on SES, not just race
- interventions did boost short-term IQ but gains faded to non-significance within a couple years
14
Q
What impact did it have on intelligence testing?
A
- one result of the outrage is that Jensen’s hope of empirical testing of the factors which influence individual differences in IQ and intelligence test scores has been completely stymied
- IQ and cognitive ability are psychometrically robust often accurately predict those outcomes they’re designed to predict
- evidence of genetic influence is strong but nobody is willing to investigate into IQ differences between racial groups