Italy Chapter 4: 1935-46 Flashcards
Mussolini’s foreign policy goals:
Mussolini’s foreign policy is often erratic and opportunistic, but he did have some clear aims:
-Assert Italy’s position as a great power - revising ToV and overcoming the shame of ‘mutilated victory’
-Create a great empire in Africa (Libya and later expand)
-Control the Mediterranean - viewed Italy as a ‘prisoner of the sea’
As time progressed, his goals didn’t change but his methods to obtain them became more aggressive into the later 1930s
-he became aggressive with western powers.
-he became closer allies with Hitler
This were both changes over time to his policy.
Often, his policy against larger powers was peaceful and his policy towards smaller nations aggressive.
Foreign Policy in 1923:
-1923, Italian general Enrico Tellini murdered on diplomatic mission in Corfu and M. used this to attack the Greek government and accused them of being involved of the murder.
-Demanded they attend funeral at Church in Athens where they would honour the Italian flag and pay 50 million lire otherwise they would be occupied.
Success:
-Celebrated by nationalists at home as they saw M. as a dynamic leader who was willing to stand up for the nation, particularly after what they saw as weakness under the Liberals.
Failure:
-LoN and the British forced Mussolini to end the occupation and put the issue to their decision (they did receive the 50 million lire however.)
-Potentially shows M. subservience to greater powers than his own - he was informed that Italy would barley last 48 hours against Britain’s navy.
Success in 1924:
-Yugoslavia recognised Fiume as Italy’s land.
Success:
-Showed M. success as a great leader who cared for national pride - the victory was symbolic as Fiume held no real value.
-The success was mostly symbolic whereas it brought him no international prestige.
Locarno Treaty 1925:
-Germany accepts pre WW1 borders and is seen as finally bringing peace to tensions in Europe.
-Mussolini attended and tried (and failed) to also gain the same treaty for his borders with Austria.
Success:
-Domestic success as it showed people that M. was seen as an equal to the great powers by the mere fact he attended.
Albanian and Yugoslavian Policy 1925:
-Supported Ahmet Zogu’s ascension to president and declaration as King Zog –> through bribery he obtained Albania as an Italian protectorate.
-This also undermined Yugoslavia’s policy by supporting groups that aimed to divide Yugoslavia - 1934 Croatian terrorists, funded by M., assassinated Yugoslavian King.
Early Policy in Africa (up to 1934):
-Continued Liberal governments brutal suppression of rebellions that had started in WW1:
‘Pacification of Libya’ - poison gas, 1/3 of Libyan population killed - ended in 1932
-small but well organised force and required large numbers of Italians to end it, lasted 3 years.
-kept quiet in Italian press.
Summary of M. early Foreign Policy:
-Gained him great domestic acclaim especially due to his contrast with the previous Liberal Government.
-Not any great gains made in Mediterranean.
Kellogg-Briand Pact 1928:
-Outlawed war as a means to resolving conflict - signed by 9 powers including Italy
–>M. tried to get it agreed in Rome, which was refused.
-He did eventually send a delegate to sign it-
-He dismissed the pact in parliament later.
Policy with Britain and France:
-Wanted to avoid tensions with them:
-Stayed in LoN, Locarno Treaty, Kellogg Briand Pact.
-Reached agreements to do with borders in North Africa to resolve tensions –> he didn’t fully listen to these and referred to them as insignificant.
-To summarise, he wanted to maintain good relations with Britain and France., however his desire for more control of Mediterranean conflicted with this: rearmament, supporting fascists in Malta but also relied on their finance e.g. 1927 re-evaluation of the Lira
French relations were similar but many antifascists settled in France and OVRA operated in France also which led to tense relations. They were also a rival in the Mediterranean and in NA (Tunisia)
Policy with Germany:
-Aware that Germany could act as a counterbalance in Europe with Britain and France –> financed far right groups in 1920s.
-Also thought this might make Britain and France more likely to support his FP aims with a stronger ally to back him.
-Once Hitler came to power, it was initially tense –> 4 power conference which led to no peace (although he portrayed it as a victory)
-Nazi racial policy presented Italians as inferior.
-Competing interests in Austria as M. needed it to exert his influence –> 1934 M. was able to convince Hitler to not do Anschluss and also to get Chancellor Dollfuss to crack down on Austrian Nazis. When he was assassinated, he sent 40k troops to Austrian border to persuade Hitler to back down.
-This was a propaganda win as it portrayed M. as a stabilising force in Europe.
Content of the Stresa Front/Agreement:
Italian, British and French agreed:
-Criticised Germany’s rearmament.
-Reaffirmed support for 1925 Locarno Treaties.
-Support independence of Austria.
Success:
Mussolini portrayed himself as a great statesman and had gained western support.
Failure:
The actual pact was vague and did not include any actual commitments from member countries.
The 3 countries were actually divided on how to deal with Germany. (M. undermined in this agreement by Anglo-German Naval agreement.)
How did Mussolini use the Stresa Front to his advantage?
-Used British and French fears of German power to expand his own influence in North Africa (which would eventually strain western relations) and knew it would prevent Anschluss.
Conclusion:
-Mussolini’s early foreign policy was spent gaining the Balkans as his sphere of influence
-Later Policy was spent aiming to prevent the spreading influence of Nazi Germany and to improve relations with Britain and France.
One aim that persists throughout is his desire for Italy to be seen as a great power.
Section 2: Aggressive Foreign Policy 1935-1940
(6 factors) Decision to Invade Abyssinia:
-Mussolini had misinterpreted Stresa Front that Britain and France were okay with him taking Abyssinia
-The invasion was popular with conservative elites - would create war contracts and with fascists - create unity in party and bring back to warlike beginnings.
-To bring national prestige/propaganda win by avenging humiliation at Adowa in 1896 and expanding the empire.
-Create empire in East Africa
-Find new market for Italy’s materials - many Italians would move to new land (hopefully)
-Impress Hitler.
Wal-Wal Incident 1934:
Military confrontation with 50 Italian deaths and 150 Abyssinian deaths at Italian Fort - Wal-Wal.
This led Mussolini to place 220k troops on Abyssinian border in 1935, bringing them very close to war.
Invasion of Abyssinia:
-1935: Captured Adowa: symbolic win as seen as avenging the loss in 1896.
-overall, slow advance as they had too build roads to transport goods
-attack was also slow due to counter attacks by Abyssinian’s.
-Victory achieved in 1936 - 600k troops used along with mustard gas and air power.
Successes in Abyssinia:
-Hailed domestically as a great win for Fascism and the glory of it - 20 mill Italians listened to radio broadcast - ‘Italy has its empire’
-church supported it as it was seen as a way to spread Catholicism (King was crowned Emperor of Italian territories in East Africa)
-sanctions allowed Mussolini to present himself as standing up to entire world in this.