Issues and Interests Flashcards

1
Q

Why is understanding the interests of all parties involved crucial?

A

for effective communication + problem-sovling.
Interests shape the positions taken by negotiators and influence
their willingness to cooperate and compromise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

High politics (survival)

A

: military security and economic interests.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Low politics

A

environment
human rights
aid + development
health

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Why differnce high/low politics

A

Because low-politics issues are not perceived as threatening the territorial integrity of the state, they
are not viewed in the same light as security issues

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Issue salience !!!!!!!!!

A

Refers to the importance a particular actor or set of actors gives to an issue – the
perceived stakes.

Not all parties hold the same level of importance for each issue.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Why identifying salient issues?

A

Not all issues hold the same level of importance for each party. Recognizing the
varying degrees of salience allows negotiators to PRIORITIZE and
ALLOCATE RESOURCES accordingly.
By IDENTIFYING key interests,
and salient issues, negotiators can focus their efforts on finding COMMON GROUND
and addressing the most CRITICAL concerns.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Four factors influence issue salience

A
  1. The distribution of costs and benefits among domestic actors
  2. The commitment of key individuals and groups to the negotiation issue
  3. The urgency that the presence of a crisis situation adds
  4. The level of the media attention focused on the negotiations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Starkley defintion issue salience

A

The importance a particular actor or set of actors give to an issue –>the Perceived stakes (Starkey)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Domestic level

A

distribution of costs/ benefits among domestic actors

The degree to which any negotiation party feels that it is being unfairly burdened or that others are unfairly rewarded will increase the intensity of that group’s efforts to change policy courts.

  • interest groups increase salience
  • diverging/ competing perceptions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Commiting to an issue

A

advantage: issue will become a priority (resources)
disadvantage: issue will be subject to emotions and irrationality (pride & identity)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Sense of urgency (crisis)

A

Crisis situation create perceptions of high levels of potential costs to a nation-state.
Crises threaten basic national + societal values, raising interest of all policy actors.
*Aim not to further aggravate the situation
* preventive scope

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

CNN-effect

A

Perceptions of stakes can be greatly swayed by national + international media.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

3 roles the media can take within Political affairs

A
  1. Facilitation ‘‘public diplomacy’’ by providing the conduit through which government and individuals can get their points heard.
  2. Officials sometimes utilise media diplomacy to communicate with actors
  3. Similar to concept of dual-track diplomacy.
    ( Unofficial policy discourse)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Back channel

A

Utility of secret meetings,
avoids pressure from level II (domestic)

Publicizing willingness to negotiate internationally= more pressure from interested groups domestically

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

(Win-win set: what does it depend on?

A
  • distribution of power
    1. preferences + possible coalitions of both international as domestic actors
    2. rules of ratification procedure (majority voting) agreement.
    3. Costs of non-agreement

–> without overlap: no international agreement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Pro’s for backchanneling

A
  • provide temporary protection from spoilers and scrutiny, enabling explorations + testing of commitments
  • help bypass preconditions and deal spoilers
17
Q

cons for backchanneling

A
  • can lead to delays and impasse perpetuation
  • risks of public backlash + reputational damage
18
Q

Ways political leaders manipulate media

A
  • making an issue salient
  • visual aid
  • information overload
  • (Re)framing of issues
19
Q

Two-level games

A

a term used to characterize double set of negotiations, that must be carried out both at domestic level as international level.

Level 1: international: bargaining between negotiatiors leading to tentative agreement
Level 2: domestic

20
Q

Two-level games

A

a term used to characterize double set of negotiations, that must be carried out both at domestic level as international level.

Level 1: international: bargaining between negotiatiors leading to tentative agreement
Level 2: domestic: seperated discussions within each group of constitutions about wheter to ratify the agreement (ratification)

21
Q

Win-sets

A

overlap of perceptions of acceptable outcomes at both levels