Issues and debates Flashcards
What is determinism?
Behaviour is shaped and controlled by internal and/or external forces rather than the individual’s will to do something.
What is hard determinism?
Implies that free will is not possible as our behaviour is always controlled by internal or external factors beyond our control. Otherwise known as fatalism. It is compatible with the scientific approach.
What is soft determinism?
All human behaviour has causes, but behaviour can also be determined by our conscious choices in the absence of coercion i.e we also have some conscious mental control.
What is biological determinism?
The belief that behaviour is caused by biological infleunces- i.e. physical- that we cannot control e.g. genes, hormones, neuroanatomy, nervous system, evolutionary factors.
What is environmental determinism?
The belief that behaviour is caused by features of the environment and other agents of socialisation- external factors- that are beyond our control e.g. rewards, punishments and associations.
What is psychic determinism?
The belief that behaviour is casued by unconscious conflicts (repressed in childhood) that we cannot control.
What is free will?
The idea that humans can make choices (e.g. our thoughts, actions) and are not determined by biological or external forces. Therefore, we are self-determining.
This view does not deny that other forces infleunce our behaviour, but implies we can reject those forces.
What are examples from the course of biological determinism?
- Biological approach (approaches)
- Genetic and neural explanations of schizophrenia (schiz)
- Biological explanations of OCD (Psychopathology)
- Bowlby’s evolutionary theory of attachment (attachment)
- Evolutionary explanations of relationships (relationships)
- Genetic/neural/ evolutionary explanations of aggression (aggression)
Evaluation of biological determinism?
Scientific approach but too narrow in approach, biological determinism misses the psychological side of things.
What are examples from the course of environmental determinism?
- Behaviourist approach (approaches)
- Learning explantion of attachment (attachment)
- Acquisition and maintance of phobias (psychopathology)
Evaluation of enviornmental determinism?
Scientific approach, attempts to determine the laws of behaviour. But learning theory completely ignore psychological and evolutionary factors in attachment, phobia explanations ignore evolutionary aspects so too narrow
What are examples from the course of psychic determinism?
- Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation (attachment)
- Psychodynamic approach (approaches)
Evaluation of psychic determinism?
Psychodynamic approach professes to be scientific but in fact in based on unmeasurable concepts like the id, ego and superego. Both are way too specific and miss lots of other factors.
What are examples from the course of free will?
- Maslow’s hierachry of needs (Approaches)
- Rodger’s person-centered counselling (Approaches)
- Jahoda’s criteria for ideal mental health (psychopathology)
- The humanist approach (approaches)
Evaluation of free will?
This approach is useful for exploring the individual in great detail and understanding from a more ideographic approach.
But it is not very scientific, therefore very difficult to draw general patterns of human behaviour from this approach.
Does support the current justice system standards.
What are examples from the course of hard determinism?
Biological, behaviourist and psychodynamic approaches (and therefore any theories based on them).
Evaluation of hard determinism?
Very scientific in their approach.
However, can mean being rigid and inflexible in their predictions, and evidence can prove their theories are incomplete because they are overly reductionist. It also can mean people can feel ‘doomed’ to behave in certain ways because of their genes/ upbringing ect- can prove to be a self-fufilling prophecy.
What are examples from the course of soft determinism?
- Social learning theory
- Many cognitive theories
Evaluation of soft determinism?
Can be a useful mid ground but can be a bit broad and sometime difficult to test experimentally so more unscientific
What evalaution point is supporting for determinism?
The view is consistent with the aims of science. The notion that human behaviour is orderly and obeys laws places psychology on equal footing with other more established sciences. Additionally, the value of such research is that prediction and control of human behaviour has led to the development of treatments, therapies and behavioural interventions that have benefited many e.g. drug treatments for managing schizophrenia. The experinece of total loss of control over thoughts and behaviour in this case supports the determinism side of the debate casts doubt over the free will side.
What does the support for determinism suggest about the determinism vs free will debate?
Suggests that at least in terms of mental illnesses, behaviour appears to be determined.
What evaluation point is supporting free will?
Everyday expeirence gives the impression that we are constantly choosing our thoughts and actions. Therefore, the concept has face validity.
Research suggests that people who have an internal locus of control tend to be more mentally healthy. Resrach has found that adolescents with a strong belief in fatalism (believing their lives were decided by events outside of their control) were at significantly greater risk of developing depression.
What does the support for free will suggest about the determinism vs free will debate?
Suggests that even if we do not have free will, the fact that we think we do may have a positive effect on the mind.
What evaluation point undermines free will?
Studies have recorded activity in motor area of the brain before the person had conscious awareness of the decision to move their finger. In other words, the decision to move the finger was simply a ‘read-out’ of a pre-determined action. This challenges the free will side of the debate.
What does the undermining evidence for free will suggest about the determinism vs free will debate?
This suggests that even our most basic experinces of free will are decided and determined by our brain before we become aware of them.
What evaluation point undermines determinism?
This position is incompatible with our notions of legal responsibility, and creates an issue in the treatment of mental disorders. In US criminal cases, there have been attempts to claim that their behaviour was caused by inherited agressive tendencies and therefore they should not be punished with the death penalty. These arguments have been rejected.
What does the undermining evidence for determinism suggest about the determinism vs free will debate?
In a court of law, offenders are held morally accountable for their actions. Therefore, a determinist position may be undesirable because it would allow individuals to ‘excuse’ their behaviour.
Free will vs determinism: Causal explanations & hard determinism: What is one of the basic principles of science and an example of this?
That every event in the universe has a cause and that causes can be explained by general laws- which reflects the hard determinist stance.
E.g. the behavioural approach explains behaviour through learned stimulus-reponse mechanisms in classical and operant conditioning, and punishment.
Free will vs determinism: Causal explanations & hard determinism: Why are the knowledge of causes and the formulation of laws important?
Because they allow scientists to predict and control events in the future. This includes drawing up hypotheses about behaviour (predicting) and conducting experiments (manipulating an IV-control).
Free will vs determinism: Causal explanations & hard determinism: What is the most scientific research method for psychology and what does it enable?
Laboratory experiments, it enables researchers to demonstrate causal relationships- it’s like the test tube used in other sciences where all variables can be controlled.
Free will vs determinism: Causal explanations & hard determinism: What does this all mean?
Taking a hard determinist stance/ perspective means adopting the most scientific approach in psychology .
What is the nature-nurture debate?
Concerned with the extent to which aspects of behaviour are a product of inherited or acquired characteristics.