Introduction Flashcards

1
Q

Approximately –% of adults aged 20 to 64 have no teeth and almost –%
of seniors (above the age of 65) have no remaining teeth.

A

5
30

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

The leading causes for teeth loss are (2)

A

caries and periodontal disease.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Approximately —% of US adults aged 20-64 had dental caries in 2011-2012, —% of
which suffered from untreated dental caries.

A

91
26

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Periodontal disease affects —% of the population between 35-44
years of age and —% of people over 65 years of age.

A

75
95

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

— million Americans are missing at least one tooth, and more than — million are currently edentulous, 2/3 of which in both arches (ACP).

A

120
36

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

The success rate of dental implants has been
reported in the scientific literature to be around
–%.

A

98

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Denture - –% of lost function restored

A

30

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Removable Partial - –% of lost function restored

A

60

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Fixed Dental Prostheses (Crowns
and Bridges)
(2)

A
  • 100% of lost function restored
  • Can be tooth or implant supported
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

DentalImplant

A

“A prosthetic device or alloplastic material
implanted into the oral tissues beneath the
mucosal and/or periosteal layer, and/or within the
bone to provide retention and support for a fixed
or removable dental prosthesis.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

skipped
H I S T O R Y O F I M P L A N T S

A

■As Early as 600AD Mayan Origin
■Modern Implant Dentistry Early 19thCentury
■Strock: 1931 Vitallium
■Formiggini:1947 Tantalum
■Chercheve: 1947 Chrome-cobalt
■Branemark: 1965 Titanium

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q
  • Eposteal:
A

on/around the bone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q
  • Transosteal:
A

through the bone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q
  • Endosteal:
A

in the bone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

■EPOSTEAL -

A

Subperiosteal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

■TRANSOSTEAL -

A

Transmandibular

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

■ENDOSTEAL -

A

Blade and Root Form

18
Q

S u b p e r i o s t e a l I m p l a n t
■Early edition: 1941 by Dr. Gustav Dahl of Sweden
■Introduced in 1960 by Goldberg and Gershkoff
■Material
■Denture is
■Survival rate –% Ten years (Harvard Consensus)
■Indicated for
■Bone resorption leads to

A

Vitallium metal
implant supported / expensive
85
atrophic edentulous mandible.
mobility infection and loss

19
Q

T r a n s o s tea l I m pl a n t
■Introduced I. Small 1968
■Matieral
■–% Success rate at fifteen years (excellent)
■Only indicated for the
■Denture is — supported

A

Titanium metal
91
edentulous mandible
tissue

20
Q

Tr a n s o s t e a l I m p l a n t
Requires one surgery usually in the —.

21
Q

Tr a n s o s t e a l I m p l a n t
approach

A

External incision / approach.

22
Q

Tr a n s o s t e a l I m p l a n t
Excellent for the

A

atrophic mandible where root form implants would weaken the jaw.

23
Q

Tr a n s o s t e a l I m p l a n t
Complex surgical procedure therefore

A

not widely used.

24
Q

Tr a n s o s t e a l I m p l a n t
Restricted to the

A

anterior mandible.

25
T MI : T r a n s m a n d i bu l a r I m p l a n t ■--% success rate ■-- supported denture ■Used for severe ■Material ■Reversible –
97 Implant atrophic mandibles <10mm Gold Alloy, not titanium can be removed due to design of screws and degree of integration, but not easy process
26
T M I : T r a n s m a n d i b u l a r I m p l a n t ■Allows
facial muscles to be reattached to improve facial profile
27
T M I : T r a n s m a n d i b u l a r I m p l a n t stage/approach
One stage, extra-oral approach (submental)
28
T M I : T r a n s m a n d i b u l a r I m p l a n t Eliminates
ridge augmentation or vestibuloplasty
29
E n d o s tea l I m pl a n t T yp e s BLADE : ■Leonard Linkow 1969 ■Material ■--- stage/best for ■--% five year survival ■Most widely used until 1980
■Titanium metal One, partially edentulous mandibles 75
30
B l a d e I m p l a n t ■Early failures due to
heat at preparation and immediate loading
31
B l a d e I m p l a n t ■Drawbacks:
Difficult to prepare a precision slot and if it fails, a large section of bone is involved
32
R o o t F o r m I m p la n ts ■Success rate greater than --% ■Indicated for ■Multiple uses:
90 partially and fully edentulous cases/any area of the mouth (versatility) overdenture, hybrid, crown and bridge, ortho anchorage...
33
R o o t F o r m I m p l a n t s Historically multiple attempts made with a multitude of metals. Became the standard with the research of Per-Ingvar Brånemark in 1970 and the Concept of Osseointegration. (5)
■Titanium or an alloy of titanium-aluminum-vanadium metal(s) ■1 or 2 stage approach ■In office procedure ■Screws/Cylinders ■Machined or rough (to increase surface area for integration)
34
Super I m p l a n t s : Z y g o m a t i c & P t e r y g o i d Indicated when
there is no maxillary posterior bone
35
Osseointegration
Brånemark introduced the term osseointegration and defined it as “a direct structural and functional connection between ordered, living bone and the surface of a load-carrying implant.”
36
T I T A NI UM: 196 4 to P r e se n t (3)
■Not recognized as a foreign object by the body ■Less host rejection than other metals/alloys ■Medicine also recognized utilization in joint replacements and heart valves
37
I m p l a n t Vs To o t h (2)
* Important distinction from natural dentition * Implants are not teeth and there is extensive evidence that they behave differently
38
I m pl a n t V s T o o t h Not susceptible to the same disease processes that affect our dentate patients. Teeth: (2) Implants: (2)
*Caries *Periodontal disease *Peri-implantitis (bone) *Peri-mucositis (soft-tissue)
39
P r o g n o sis Predictability of single implant fixture survival is in the ---% range
94-98
40
I m p l a n t F i x t u r e L o s s ~---% of failures occur prior to the placement of the restoration ~---% occur after the restoration placement
55-60 40-45