Interviewing Suspects Flashcards
The ‘old’ way
In India a survey found that some police officers said that they do use a variety of intimidation techniques (Alison et al 2008).
Reid approach, used has been criticised for being sufficiently coercive to cause false confessions (Leo,2008).
A Newer way
Growing number of countries have decided to adopt a model to investigate interviewing that does not rely on a coercive approach.
Reasons for coercion
One of the major assumptions underlying justification for use of coercive interrogation techniques is the pervasive ‘common-sense belief that
“suspects
Little Research
Interviews have rarely been scrutinized in detail in published research and usually is not made available to outside researchers.
There has been little interaction between psychologists and police concerning how to interview someone.
Up to mis 1980s no guidance
Guidance becomes available
These have been trained/adopted by considerable number of investigators around the world.
Unfortunately, (Gudjonsson 1992, 2003; Memon) argues some of recommended procedures may, cause false confessions, partly being coercive.
Public Opinion
1994 Williamson (Senior Police Officer) stated - unethical behaviour by interrogators has undermined public confidence, and left the police with a serious skill deficit. It does not take much skill to beat a confession our a suspect detained in custody. However, the police in this this country would correctly deny such things happened, but the public thought it happened regularly.
Baldwin’s Pioneering Research Study
20 - 600 interviews examined did change their story in course of the interview. In only 9 of these cases was that change of heart attributable to the persuasive skills of the interviewer, and only three involved offences of any seriousness. Majority stick to their starting position.
Early Revelation by Interviewer: Moston (1992)
Over several hundred taped interviews, if any tried to obtain people’s accounts of events. Instead accused the interviewees of the offence and asked for their response.
Found when evidence was strong confessions were more likely.
When police evidence was not strong suspects soon became aware of this thus many did not confess.
Time for change
This change happened in 1992 which was called the Peace approach. It involved guidance documents and training courses that all crime investigators in England must attend.
Some of the (1992) Seven ‘principles’ of ‘PEACE’
Role is to obtain accurate reliable information from suspects, witnesses or victims in order to discover the truth about the investigation.
Be approached with an open mind.
Vulnerable people, whoever they may be, must be treated with consideration.
P E A C E
Planning and Preparation Engage and Explain Account Closure Evaluation
Planning and Preparation
Understanding the purpose of the interview
Defining aims and objectives
Analysing the already available evidence.
Engage and Explain
Explain
Reasons for interview
Legal requirements
Ground rules
Engage
Introduction
Rapport
Account
Try to obtain some information from interview
Do not interrupt, when account has finished, only ask questions relating that that account.
After gradually introduce information known to interviewer that the suspect has not yet mentioned.
Challenge contradictions/inconsistencies
Closure
Correctly summarise what the suspect said
Explain what may happen next
Do your best to ensure that interviewee leaves the interview in a positive frame of mind
Consider public confidence in your organisation and in you