Assessmnet Flashcards
Why do we conduct risk assessments? What are the ethical concerns about risk What are the ethical concerns about risk assessing offenders?assessing offenders? How do we conduct risk assessments?How do we conduct risk assessments? How successful are risk assessments?
Assessment (Brown et al, 2015)
Why the person committed the offence
The nature, level and management of risk the offender presents with
The treatment needs of the person
The persons treatability and treatment readiness
Risk Assessment
Systematic collection of information to determine the degree to which harm (self and others) is likely, at some future point (Douglas & Skeem, 2005).
Risk Vs Dangerousness
Risk
The statistical likelihood of an event occurring
- Which offenders are most likely to reoffend
Risk is dynamic: Assessment is more accurate in short term.
Dangerousness
The seriousness of the consequences of the event occurring.
Which offenders are most dangerous
Which conditions make an offender more dangerous
Ethical Issues
Professional ethics: protect the general public: prison or institutional
Forensic psychologists should always be professionally qualified; always collect data to extend the knowledge in the field.
Forensic Psychologists must be aware of:
Reliability and validity of chosen tools
Base rate and it effects
Own biases (feminist psychology)
Deception/manipulation by an offender
Psychological assessments should:
Involve multiple repeated methods
Use evidence to make decisions
Avoid confirmation bias
Include costs and benefits
Be monitored for accuracy
Defendable
How do we assess? Key principles
Specify the risks
Specify the possible outcomes
Assess the likelihood of these outcomes
Assess the severity of these outcomes
Process
1: Theoretical basis
Preliminary hypothesis
2: Data gathering
Date analysis
3: Formulation
Reformulation
Formulation Definition:
A conceptual model representing an offenders various difficulties, the hypothesized underlying mechanisms and their interrelationships.
Formulation also aims to suggest what individual and systemic factors continue to maintain a person’s difficulties/offending behaviour.
Areas to Assess: Risks (Historical factors)
Family background and family functioning
Offending history
Education and employment
Psychosexual background
Relationship (romantic and peers)
Developmental history
Areas to Assess: Risks Dispositional factors
Personality
Attitudes to offending
Attachment style
Areas to Assess: Risks
Clinical Variables
Mental health & substance misuse history
Medication and attitude towards taking medication
Areas to Assess: Risks
Personality disorders
Psychopathy
Current offence analysis
Areas to Assess: Risks Protective Factors
Personal Resources
Family Supports
Social Supports
Calming: Influences/Negotiation
Evidence of Progress
Clinical Risk Assessment (1st Generation)
Derives from the tradition of one to one casework in medical, social and probation contexts and refers to the practitioners use of experience, interviewing skills, observation and professional judgement to arrive at an assessment (Robinson, 2003)