interpersonal attraction- lecture 4 Flashcards
psychologists suggest attractiveness predicts:
- grades at school- clifford and waltser
- income- frieze et al
- sentences given by judges- downs and lyons
perret et al
people preferred symmetrical faces to non symmetrical
theory of evolution
motivated to find a partner with strong genes
facial symmetry signals gene strength
what other facial features are attractive?
men- prominent brow and cheekbones, wide jaw
females- smooth skin, high cheekbones
features of physically attractive bodies
- women with hourglass shap- waist to hip ratio of .70
- men with broad shoulders and narrow waist
investigations nto physically attractive bodies
- bodily symmetry- tovee et al 2000- greater bodily symmetry associated with greater reproductive ability in men and women
- sperm quality- manning et al 1998
- reproductive ability in women- manning et al 1997- used symmetry of breast scans
investigations into the importance of attraction
- buss (1989)
- males preferred attractive partners
- females preferred good financial prospects
- greenlees and mcgrew (1994)
- men-described financial prospects and seeked attractive females
- women- described attractiveness and seeked financial prospects
physcholgical features influencing attraction
- proximity
- familiarity
- similarity
proximity
how close someone is to an individual in distance
assessed this in student accommodation
65% friends lived in the same building
familiarity
easier to get to know someoneif they live close to you
more often you see someone, more familiar they are to you
familiarity leads to increased liking (zajinc 1968)
moreland and beach 1992- had 4 cnfederates attend lecture series 0,5,10,15 times and measured how much the students liked each confederate
similarity
montoya and horton 2012
meta analysis assessing relationship between similarity and liking
similarity positively correlated with liking- centrality, attitude vs personality
clore 1976- law of attraction- attraction is positively associated with the similarity between 2 people
invitation
clark and hatfield 1989
between participants design
“i have been noticing you around campus. i find you very attractive. would you…”
- go out with me tonight
- come over to my apartment tonight
- go to bed with me tonight
female more likely to agree to go out
males more likely to agree to go to bed
Hess and Flores- responding to toxic masculinity
silence, witty response, call out action
thompson 2018- 2 main themes in mens responses to rejection- not hot enough, missing discourse of consent