interference Flashcards
What do psychologists believe about LTM?
Once info has reached the ltm store it is permanent but problems occur with accessing the information.
What is interference in the context of memory?
When 2 pieces of information conflict with each other. Can result in forgetting one or both pieces of information
What is retroactive interference?
When a newer memory interferes with an older
example of retroactive interference
Teachers learning so many new names this year they forget the ones from last year
What is proactive interference?
occurs when an older memory interferes with an newer one
example of retroactive interference
Teachers learn so many names in the past they struggle to remember new ones
procedure for McGeoch & McDonald (1931).
Participants had to learn a list of words until they could remember
Learn a list of 10 adjectives (list a)
Then one of 6 other list (list b)
aim for McGeoch & McDonald (1931).
if similarity affects interference
results for McGeoch & McDonald (1931).
Synonyms = 12% accurate recall
Syllables = 26% recall
Numbers = 37% recall
A limitation of research for proactive and retroactive interference
lack in ecological validity - learning a list of meaningless words
State the findings for McGeoch & McDonald (1931).
interference is the strongest when the more similar the words are
What is the effect of similarity?
proactive interference as previously stored information makes it harder to store new similar information or because of retroactive interference in that the new information writes over it
Strength of interference - Baddeley + hitch
real world setting - rugby players
recalls did not depend on how long ago the player had the last match but the number of games they played in the mean time
A strength of interference theory is that the findings is reliable.
same result in real life setting and lab
Limitation of the theory of interference - individual differences
kane and engle: individuals with greater WM span were less susceptible to interference.
ppl are not equally effected by proactive interference due to individual differences