Insurable Interest Flashcards
Definition of Insurable Interest?
By Lawrence J in Lucena v Crawford;
“if the event happens the party will gain advantage, if it is frustrated, he will suffer a loss.”
- Incomplete definition, fails to consider legal obligations for the insured to bear any loss arising from the destruction or damage of property.
Gambling act 2005?
“the fact that a contract related to gambling should not prevent it’s enforcement.”
- No longer required to show proof of II at inception but common law duty under principle of indemnity to show II at TOL.
Insurable Interest can arise from? (5)
- Ownership, mortgager, mortgagee
- Bailees
- Landlords and tenants
- Buyer & seller of goods
- By statute
Ownership, mortgager & mortgagee? (3)
- Both have II in property
- Both can take out separate insurance for same property
- Composite policy, both have an independent ability to make a claim & failure of one party to disclose material fact does not affect other party’s rights under policy
Bailee? (2)
- II in the goods with which he is entrusted
- II in his potential liability to the bailor in the events of the goods coming to harm and in the profit or commission payable to him under bailment.
Landlord & tenant?
- Landlord has II in his reversion (property)
- If tenant responsible for repairs, landlord still has II by reason of his legal estate & may recover full value from insurer, insurer can recover against tenant insurer
- Tenant has II by his possession of leased premises, if insurers premises under principle of indemnity, he may recover his own loss
By statute?
- Hotel Proprietors Act 1956
Although limiting liability of the hotel proprietor, creates a statutory obligation in return for the liability imposed.
4 essential elements of insurable interest?
- Must be a physical object which is capable of being lost, destroyed or damaged.
- Physical object must constitute the subject matter of insurance
- PH must have some legal relationship with that object
- Value of that insurable interest must be measurable in monetary terms.
Coven Spa v Hong Kong Chinese Insurance Co Ltd (1999)?
Judges decision that defendant insurers were not liable for cargo owners claim for shortage under a marine cargo policy.