Case Law Flashcards

1
Q

Carter v Boehm (1766)

A
  • UTMOST GOOD FAITH
  • Established the PH’s duty of Utmost good fait to;
    1. Disclose all material facts to UW’s whether or not PH has been asked.
    2. All material representation made to insurers is true.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Utmost good faith case law & act?

A
  • Guthing v Lynn (1766)
  • Marine Insurance Act (1906)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Guthing v Lynn (1831)?

A
  • Relates to offer
  • Vague statement
  • Needs to be stated clearly
  • Buyer promised seller extra £5 if horse was lucky
  • Court ruled too vague to be enforceable.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Jones v Daniel (1984)?

A
  • Relates to acceptance
  • Acceptance must be identical to the offer & not introduce new terms
  • Court held that person to whom offer was made, responded by sending out a contract w additional terms - this was counteroffer rather than acceptance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Acceptance case law?

A
  • Jones v Daniel (1984)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Blyth v Birmingham Waterworks Company (1856)?

A
  • TORT - Negligence Definition
  • “Negligence is the omission to do something, to do something a reasonable & prudent man would not do.
  • Pipes allowed water to escape & flood a mans house during an extreme frost
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Negligence definition case?

A

Blyth v Birmingham Waterworks Company (1856)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Donoghue v Stevenson (1932)?

A
  • Tort - negligence case law - duty of care
  • “you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would injure your neighbour.”
  • Ginger beer bottle & snail. Personal injury.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Duty of care case law?

A

Donoghue v Stevenson (1932)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Rylands v Fletcher (1868)?

A
  • Nuisance - strict liability
  • Someone brings something (dangerous) onto their own land and it escapes may be liable in the absence of any negligent conduct on their part.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Strict liability case?

A

Rylands v Fletcher (1868)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

R V Ghosh (1982)?

A
  • THEFT - Dishonesty test
    1. Act was dishonest by the standard of an ordinary and reasonable person &
    2. The persons knew that what they were doing was dishonest
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Theft case law?

A

R v Ghosh (1982)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Lawrence J in Lucena v Crawford?

A
  • Insurable interest
  • “if the event happens, the party will gain advantage, if frustrated he will suffer a loss.”
    Incomplete definition
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Moore v Evans (1918)?

A
  • Insurable interest
  • Jewellery, not coverable but know where it is - not to say it isn’t being looked after.
  • House of lords: policy covers against the loss of goods (physical loss) - did not cover an economic loss or the loss of business opportunity.
    Jewellers in London insured their stock of jewellery, goods were sent to Germany & Belgium on a sale or return basis.
  • War, couldn’t return items back to insured.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Insurable Interest case law?

A
  • Lucena v Crawford
  • Moore v Evans (1918)
17
Q

Froome v Butcher (1976)?

A
  • Contributory negligence
  • Claimant injured in car accident, however not wearing seatbelt.
  • Damages reduced by 25% to reflect the injuries he suffered were made worse by not wearing seatbelt.
18
Q

Contributory negligence case law?

A

Froome v Butcher (1976)

19
Q

Salmond, Law of Torts?

A

“a civil wrong for which the remedy is a common law action for unliquidated damages and which is not exclusively the breach of a contract or the breach of trust or other merely equitable obligation”