Insanity/Insane Automatism Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What type of defence is it?

A

Capacity defence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Definition of insanity?

A

Defendant has a defect of reason, from a disease of the mins, so that they did not know the nature and quality of their act, or if they did, they didn’t know the act was wrong

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the two procedural rules?

A

D presumed sane
Judge decides whether the defendant is fit to plead
Burden of proof on defendant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the standard of proof

A

On a balance of probabilities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Who can raise the issue of insanity?

A

Prosecution, defence or judge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Why is insanity rarely used?

A

Due to social stigma

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

M’naghten rules

A

Labouring under a defect of reason
Arising from a disease of mind (actus reus)
Did not know the nature and quality of the act (actus reus)
Or, if he did know it, that he did not know that what he was doing was wrong (mens rea)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Labouring under a defect of reason (mens rea)

A

Deprived of the power to reason.

Does not include confusion - R v Clarke

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

R v Clarke

A

Took items from shop and forgot to pay due to diabetes - wasn’t deprived of powers of reasoning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

m

A

m

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Arising from a disease of mind (actus reus)

A

Supported by medical evidence

Must be caused by internal factor existing at time of act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

jm

A

m

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Did not know the nature and quality of the act (actus reus)

A

Meaning the physical nature and consequences, not the morality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

m

A

m

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Or, if he did know it, that he did not know that what he was doing was wrong (actus reus)

A

Defence will fail if defendant knew their actions were legally wrong.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

R v Quick

A

Attacked patient after taking insulin but not eating enough food - Insulin was an external source

17
Q

What is the consequence of a not guilty by reason of insanity verdict for murder?

A

Indefinite hospitalisation

18
Q

Act for disposal options?

A

s 5 of the Criminal Procedure (Insanity) Act 1964

19
Q

Three disposal options?

A

Hospital order
Supervision order
Absolute discharge

20
Q

Reform paper?

A

Criminal Liability: Insanity and Automatism

21
Q

Reform proposals 3

A

Insane seems arbitrary and outdated
Mismatch between psychiatry and legal definition.
Sleepwalking cases lead to inconsistency