Inductive Fallacies Flashcards

Chapter 7

1
Q

What are Inductive Fallacies?

A

Premises fail to raise the probability of its conclusion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Generalizations

A

Lack of specificity and supported by inadequate reasoning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Generalizing from too few cases (Hasty Generalization)

A

Frequently occurs when one tries to derive a statement about members of a population from a tiny sample

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Generalizing from exceptional cases

A

Arriving at a conclusion by citing an atypical supporting case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Generalization: Accident

A

Assuming a general statement applies to a specific case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Weak Analogy

A

Argument based on unimportant similarities between things

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Mistaken Appeal To Authority

A

Commonly occurs when authority in one field or discipline is assumed to be authority in another unrelated field or discipline

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Mistaken Appeal to Popularity

A

Speaker treats issue as if it can be settled by public opinion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Popularity: Bandwagon

A

Speaker tries to convince someone to do something by suggesting most are doing it too

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Popularity: Mistaken Appeal to Common Practice

A

Speaker tries to justify certain practice on the grounds that it is traditional or customary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Cause & Effect

A

Assume timing of two variables is sufficient to assume cause-and-effect relationship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Post Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc

A

“After this, therefore because of it”, assumes consecutive events caused the other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Overlooking Possibility of Coincidence

A

Failing to recognize sequential events were simply coincidental

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Overlooking Possible Common Cause

A

Failing to recognize two events may just be the effects of one similar cause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Overlooking Possibility of Random Variation

A

Ignoring fact that variables fluctuate randomly, assuming random fluctuation is due to causation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Overlooking Possibility of Regression

A

Ignoring fact that, if average value of variable is atypical on one measurement, it is likely to be less atypical on subsequent measurement

17
Q

Cum Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc

A

“With this, therefore because of it”, assumes two events happening at the same time caused one another

18
Q

Overlooking Possibility of Coincidence (2)

A

Failing to recognize sequential events were simply coincidental

19
Q

Overlooking Possible Common Cause (2)

A

Failing to recognize two events may just be the effects of one similar cause

20
Q

Overlooking Possibility of Reverse Causation

A

Ignoring possibility of cause being effect and vice versa

21
Q

Anecdote (Casual Variety)

A

Speaker supports claim by telling a story

22
Q

Slippery Slope

A

Rests on unsupported warning that is controversial and tendentious

23
Q

Untestable Explanation

A

One offers evidence that cannot be tested even in principle (circular)