individual differences in learning Flashcards
what are learning styles
idea that people learn better with a particular mode of teaching
people are categorized into these types
popularity of learning styles
promoted by universities
scientific handbooks
school teacher programs
why learning theories are popular
like to be treated as an individual
something to blame if do badly in exam
assessment of learning styles
many different tests
but costly
questions not related to learning types?
Origin of learning-styles concept
personality theories
used for life coaching and occupational decisions
study preference
very different from learning style
people can adapt and still work in other conditions
just a favored condition not needed
learning styles hypothesis
must be a valid crossover interaction
Clean and accurate methodology
- Participants are divided into groups on basis of their reported learning style
- Random assignment to different instruction modes
- All participants take the same final test
- Find crossover interaction between learning style and instruction method.
Stenberg et al 1999
supporting
Used only gifted high school students
Only one third of the student sample was included
Random assignment to the conditions
But deviant scores were deleted – with no explanation
Concluded that - Students in the matched condition better than students in the mismatched condition
But this is not a very valid study and has many problems
Massa & Mayer 2006
- Visual or verbal learners
- Randomised assignment to conditions – help screens with computer-based task
- = no tendency for better performance for those participants who were in matching condition
Cook et al 2009
medical students
sensing and intuitive learners
found no evidence
Constantinidou & Baker 2002
visualizer-verbalizer questionnaire
visual - better free recall but no crossover interaction
Rogowsky, Calhoun & Tallal 2015
found cross over in the wrong way
dual coding
learn better when combine different representations
fixed mindset
the belief that abilities and intelligence are fixed (innate trait) and nothing can be done to change this – a person is either smart or not
consequences of fixed mindset
- The goal is to keep looking smart to others
- avoid challenging tasks - miss opportunities to learn from mistakes
- Stop trying sooner – less resilience when obstacles are detected
- Don’t bother with effort
- Problems with coping with setbacks – attributed to not being smart enough
- More likely to lie about obtaining scores, blame others or consider cheating
growth mindset
the belief that own abilities and intelligence are malleable and if you put in time and effort you can develop them – a person works hard to achieve something
growth mindset consequences
- The goal is to develop abilities over time.
- Embrace new and challenging tasks as opportunities to learn.
- They are more persistent - high resilience when obstacles ahead
- Like the effort because the past has shown that it is worth working on something
- Handle setbacks in a constructive way.
- More likely to develop new strategies and trying everything they can to succeed.
Mueller & Dweck 1998
fixed/growth mindset
experiment on 5th graders non-verbal IQ
fixed - must be smart
growth - must have worked hard
those in fixed mindset chose to do easier problems as thought they could not get any better
coping with failure
mindsets
- fixed = more likely to lie about what they got and had lowest persistence and enjoyment in task
long term effect of mindset
maths performance over 2 years
growth - improved over time
intervention to foster growth = improvement
long term effect of mindset - problems
- failed to replicate this research
- Researchers are generally sceptical towards the effects and have questioned their reliability
rule-based learner
high performance
try find out what the underlying rule or principle is and understand why the solution is an adequate one
abstract from practiced examples to unpracticed new examples
exemplar based learner
students memorise the key task features and essentially learn the steps to the solution
- Very distracted by superficial task features and are very easy to confuse by using similar wording and practiced examples
- No ability to abstract from practise examples to unpractised, new examples