Identifying Grammatical Relations Flashcards

1
Q

What are the three strategies for indicating grammatical relationships?

A

constituent order
case marking
agreement marking
they are not mutually exclusive, most langauges use a combo

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are grammatical relationships?

A

the relationship between the core arguments and the verb

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Explain constituent order

A

Some languages have a fixed CO, with different orders being associated with distinct pragmatic/semantic interpretations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Name a language that uses constituent order

A

English - subject+object are in fixed positions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the major constituents of a transitive clause?

A

S, V, O

6 possible iterations of them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the most common constituent orders?

A

SOV/SVO form 80% of languages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the most common positions for each constituent?

A

90% of languages put V next to O
96% put S before O
even if subjects are not clause initial, they initiate the action expressed by the verb

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Explain how constituent order can vary within a language

A

In some languages, certain orders are associated with certain clause types
German: SOV=embedded clauses, SVO=root clauses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Explain case marking

A

When certain morphology is used to mark the relationship between the verb and nominal arguments
It allows for variation in the position of arguments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the difference between case marking and agreement marking?

A

Marking on NP=case marking

on verb = agreement marking

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the two main ways languages differentiate between core arguments?

A

Generally A and O are differentiated
Either S+A are marked with a nom morpheme whilst O is marked with an accusative morpheme
or S+O are marked with an absolutive morpheme and A is marked with an ergative morpheme

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Are all participants marked in case marking languages?

A

It is common for one member of each to be marked (have no special case inflection)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is agreement marking?

A

The relationship between the argument and the predicate is marked through verbal agreement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is verbal agreement?

A

When the head verb is marked to reflect grammatical properties of the NP argument

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How does verbal agreement vary acrosslanguages?

A
In some languages V only agrees with S
in others (Swahili), V agrees with more than one argument
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How does constituent order affect agreement marking?

A

CO can affect which marker is used

  • in Northern Sotho, usually, the subject is marked when the standard CO is followed
  • when changed, subject is still marked but so is Obj
17
Q

Why does constituent order affect agreement marking?

A

When there is only on NP preceding the verb, so there is no ambiguity about what is doing the action
When there are two NPs the clarification is needed

18
Q

What are the 5 properties of an object?

A

O can be passivised
They have a specific position in langs with a fixed CO
In nom/acc languages, obj are marked with acc morphemes
In accusative systems, Objects are the complement of a
two-argument (transitive) verb.
If a verb agrees with two args, one must be obj

19
Q

What are the 6 properties of a subject?

A

tend to appear first in a clause
often used to express the agent of a verb
understood to be the missing argument of imperatives
often the target in passives
often control referential properties of a NP in another clause(understood subj of embedded clauses)
control reflexive NPs (“self” forms)