Hypothesis Testing, Validity, and threats to Validity Flashcards

1
Q

Please name the four types of validity!

A
  1. statistical validity
  2. construct validity
  3. External Validity
  4. Internal Validity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q
  1. statistical validity
A

focusses on the question whether or not the conclusions are reasonable given the statistical laws. Important are validated instruments and large sample sizes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q
  1. construct validity
A

focusses on how well an instrument measures the intended construct, often investigated by comparing results of an instrument with previous and validated research.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q
  1. External Validity
A

refers to the degree of generalizability of the results to other context.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q
  1. Internal Validity
A

the extent to which what you measure is really due to the manipulation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Could you name the nine major confounding variables?

A

Maturation, History, Testing, Instrumentation, Regression to the mean, Selection, Experimental mortality, design contamination, order effects.

Good Job!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What’s the sequence effect? (Maturation)

A

changes in the dependent variable due to normal developmental changes, such as a declining rate of good answers in a long exam due to fatigue
Solution:
Counterbalancing of sequences (half: AB; rest: BA)
Counterbalancing of sequences for more than two conditions.
- complete counterbalancing
- Latin Square

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Whats the History confounder?

A

changes in the dependent variable due to unexpected wituational changes during the study, but not related to the study.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Whats the carry-over effect (confounder)?

A

changes in the dependent variable scores due to pre-testing, for example pre-testing pre-testing can adjust people to the way of questioning, they learn.
Solution:
Often asymmetrical: A  B ≠ B  A
This “asymmetrical transfer” is unsolvable in a within-subjects design
Solution: between-subjects design

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

The instrumentation confounder

A

a change in the way a dependent variable was measured during the study can influence the results.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Regression to the mean

A

when participants are selected because of their extreme scores, they tend to have less extreme scores in the future because they get back to their mean, this does not mean that the treatment was succesful, its just their mean

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What do we call the subject or participant effect?

A

changes in the participants behavior that are more likely due to participating than to the variables under investigation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

placebo effect

A

occurs when participants have a strong expectation about the treatmentand project this expectation on themself, so its either a false sense of effect or the effect is due to the participnts expectations and not due to the treatment itself.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

experimenter effects:

A

biasing effects cause by the actions ofthe researcher.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are the advatages of between-subject designs?

A

advantage: no sequence/carryover effects
disadvantage: potential group differences
 random assignment of subjects to conditions
 random assignment of matched pairs to conditions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the (dis)advantages of within-subject designs?

A

advantage: no group differences; subject is its own control
disadvantage: chance of sequence effects
Randomization of sequences
Counterbalancing (complete or Latin Square)
do not use in case of (asymmetrical) carryover effects