Human Rights and Contempt of Court Flashcards

1
Q

Are UK Courts bound by the ECtHR?

A

No, but judgements are highly persuasive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

For an individual to petition the ECtHR what must have happened?

A
  1. All UK routes must have been exhausted

2. Cases must be brought within 6 months of the Supreme Court decision

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Is the right to life absolute or qualified? What Article?

A

Absolute. Article 2

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Is the right to freedom from torture absolute or qualified? Which Article?

A

Absolute. Article 3

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Is the right to freedom from slavery absolute or qualified?

A

Absolute. Article 4

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Is the right to a Fair Trial absolute or qualified? Which article?

A

Absolute. Article 6

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Is the right to freedom of thought absolute or qualified?

A

Absolute. Article 9

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Is right to respect for private and family life absolute or qualified? Which article?

A

Qualified. Article 8

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Is the right to freedom of assembly and association absolute or qualified? Which article?

A

Qualified. Article 11

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Is the right to freedom of expression absolute or qualified? Which article?

A

Qualified. Article 10

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the three conditions for a qualification of a right to be applied lawfully?

A
  1. The qualification must be prescribed by law
  2. The qualification must be necessary in a democratic society
  3. The qualification must have a legitimate aim
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the three subparts of “necessary in a democratic society”

A
  1. Pressing social need
  2. Margin of appreciation for what the state needs to do (presumed state is right)
  3. Infringement of a convention right must be proportionate
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the test in Daly?

A

The proportionality test.

  1. The legislative objective must be sufficiently important to justify limiting a right
  2. The measures must be designed to meet the object rationally
  3. The means used to impair the right should go no further than is necessary
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What can the UK Supreme Court do to a UK statute?

A

Make “declaration of incompatibility”.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What does the s6 HRA 1998 do?

A

Allow any ECHR article to be used as a ground of challenge for judicial review

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Which section of which act allows any ECHR article to be used as a ground of challenge for judicial review

A

s6 HRA 1998

17
Q

Which article guarantees a “private, family, home life” as well as correspondence?

A

Article 8

18
Q

What does the Huang case say about proportionality?

A

The interests of wider society should be balanced against the interests of an individual

19
Q

What happened in the case of R (Countryside Alliance) v Attorney General?

A

It was held that article 8 did not protect the right to hunt foxes

20
Q

What happened in Peck v UK?

A

An attempted suicide was broadcast on national TV in connection with a crime. It was held that the broadcast footage interfered with the right to a private life

21
Q

What happened in S and Marper v UK?

A

It was held that DNA data being held infringed the right to privacy under article 8

22
Q

Campbell v MGM. What happened?

A

Lady Hale ruled that the deciding factor in balancing articles 8 and 10 was whether someone had a “reasonable expectation of privacy”

23
Q

Von Hannover v Germany

A

The ECtHR gave more weight to article 8 than the HoL as they allowed a claim by Princes Caroline that photos of her shopping, skiing and horseriding breached her privacy

24
Q

Murray v Express Newspapers

A

It was decided that pictures of JK Rowling’s son did engage Article 8 over Article 10 as a child was involved

25
Q

Mosely v NGN

A

It was held that although the public were interested in Mosely’s sadomasochistic orgy, because there was no public interest in the outcome it was not reasonable to limit article 8

26
Q

What Tort must claims for privacy be brought under?

A

Breach of confidence

27
Q

What does s1 of the Contempt of Court Act 1981 say?

A

Conduct which tends to interfere with the course of justice in a particular legal proceeding is contempt of court, regardless of whether it was intended to do so

28
Q

Conduct which tends to interfere with the course of justice in a particular legal proceeding is contempt of court, regardless of whether it was intended to do so. Which Act?

A

s1 of the Contempt of Court Act

29
Q

Is liability strict in contempt of court cases?

A

Yes

30
Q

Can a newspaper reporting facts breach the CCA

A

Yes,if the reporting “tends to prejudice” a jury

31
Q

What is the ratio in A-G v News Group?

A

The conduct must create a “substantial risk of serious prejudice”

32
Q

When does s1 of the CCA 1981 apply when communicating?

A

It only applies to communications addressed to the public at large or a large section of the public

33
Q

What was the ruling in Swami Synanda?

A

Attempts to save a holy cow from being culled due to having TB failed, despite a challenge under Article 9