Difficult Tort Flashcards

1
Q

Stark v Post Office.

A

Statutory obligations are often strict

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Smith v Baker

A

Workers do not consent to risks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Caswell v Powell

A

Workers are unlikely to be found to be guilty of contributory negligence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Wheeler v New Merton Mill

A

No volenti in statuory cases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the duty in Hatton v Sutherland?

A

The “threshold question” in Hatton is: Was the worker reasonably foreseeably at risk of injury to health through stress?

This question is made up of two parts:

  1. The nature and extent of the work
  2. Signs from the employee
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Melville v Home Office

A

An employer was found to be liable for stress at work from a prison officer who had seen several dead bodies of suicide victims

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Lister v Hesley Hall

A

Intentional and even illegal acts can still result in vicarious liability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Rose v Plenty

A

Mikround case- vicarious liability found

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Poland v Parr

A

The employer was liable for someone pushing a customer away to protect a stall

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Warren v Henley’s

A

The employer was not liable for the employee punching a customer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Twine v Bean’s express

A

There was no vicarious liability to a hitchhiker who had been picked up

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Hilton v Thomas Burton

A

Visiting a relative at the end of the day was “on a frolic”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Harvey v O’Dell

A

Getting lunch was not on a “frolic”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

General Cleaning Contractors v Christmas

A

The duty to provide a safe system of work exists wherever the employee is working

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Bux v Slough Metal

A

The employer must supervise the safe system of work

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Century Instance v NI Road Transport Board

A

Doing an authorised act in an unauthorised way is in the course of employment

17
Q

Ratcliffe v McConnell

A

Volenti applies in trespass cases. If the claimant is aware of the risk, then s1(6) of the Occupiers Liability Act will apply

18
Q

Tomlinson v Congleton

A

The danger must be caused by the “state of the premises” or something that is done or should be done to them

19
Q

What is the difference between Donogue v Folkstone Properties and Rhind v Astbury?

A
  1. In Rhind- the claimant failed to satisfy s1(3)a as the occupier didn’t know there was an obstruction in the like
  2. In Donogue the claimant failed to satisfy s1(3)b as the occupier did not have reasonable grounds to believe a trespasser would be swimming off Folkestone harbour
20
Q

What is the rule in The Calgarth?

A

When you invite someone into your house to use the staircase, you don’t invite them to slide down the banisters