Employers Liability Flashcards
What are the three duties set out in Wilsons & Clyde Coal regarding employers liability?
A duty of the employer to provide:
- Compettent staff
- Adequate material
- A proper system of work and supervision
A duty of the employer to provide:
- Competent staff
- Adequate material
- A proper system of work and supervision
is set out in which case?
Wilsons & Clyde Coal
Hudson v Ridge Manufacturing
The duty to provide competent fellow workers arises where an employer knows about the risk aparticular worker is posing to fellow wokers.
The duty to provide competent fellow workers arises where an employer knows about the risk aparticular worker is posing to fellow wokers. Which case?
Hudson v Ridge Manufacturing
Which section of which Act gives employers liability for the faulty machinery of third parties?
Employers Liability (Defective Equipment) Act 1960 Section 1 (1)(b)
What are the torts under the heading of employers liability?
Common Law Negligence
Breach of Statutory Duty
Vicarious Liability
General Cleaning Contractors v Christmas. What is the ruling?
An employer must assess the place of work, wherever an employee is sent.
What are the four aspects of the rule in Wilsons & Clyde Coal?
- Competent fellow staff
- Adequate fellow workers
- A proper system of work and supervisions
- A safe workplace (Latimer v AEC)
Which is the leading case on stress at work?
Walker v Northumberland County Council
Which case regarding employers liability for stress sets out guidelines? Which case confirms?
Hatton v Sutherland, Court of Appeal.
Confirmed by Barber, HoL
What is Lady Hale’s key test as set out in Barber v Somerset County Council
Is stress reasonably foreseeable for this particular employee?
What are the guidelines in Hatton v Sutherland?
The nature of the work carried out by the employee.
Signs from the employee.
What are the the types of statutory duties with regards to damages?
- Statutes that specifically exclude tortious liability
- Statutes that specifically allow it
- Statutes that ate silent on tortious liability
What are the factors that must be used to interrogate a statute to see if a civil claim is possible?
Factor 1:
Does the statute specifically protect a limited class of people?
(Lornho v Shell)
Factor 2:
Whether the statute provides for any sanction.
Factor 3:
Whether the sanction is effective (Groves v Lord Wimborne).
In breach of statutory duty is there ever a need to look at remoteness?
No, if the claim satisfies the mischief rule, as in Gorris v Scott, remoteness is already proven.