Formation of contracts and estoppel Flashcards
What is the definition of consideration?
A benefit to one party and a detriment to another”
OR
“A promise in return for a promise”
Past consideration is not good consideration
Roscorla v Thomas
What are the exceptions to past consideration not being good consideration?
Lampleigh v Braitwaite The act was at the promisor’s request And Re Casey’s Patents It was understood from the outset there would be some type of payment
Collins v Godefry
Performance of a public duty is not good consideration
Performance of a public duty is not good consideration
Collins v Godefry
Performance of a public duty is not good consideration unless…
Glasbrook Bros v Glamorgan CC
Ward v Byham
It goes beyond what is usually required
Contractual Duties owed to a third parties are good consideration
Scotson v Pegg
Part performance of an existing contractual duty does not amount to good consideration
Stilk v Myrick
If you exceed the contractual obligation then that is good consideration
Hartley v Ponsonby
Williams v Roffey
Where a party has gained “practical benefit” from the original contract being performed then that will be good consideration, as long as the additional payment or new contract is not made under duress.
Foakes v Beer
Part payment of a debt is not good consideration.
Part payment of a debt is not good consideration unless..,.
Pinnel’s Case, the creditor gets something different in return
What is the judgement in Re Selectmove?
The principle in Roffey does not apply for debts
What is Treitel’s definition of an offer?
“An expression of willingness to contract on certain terms- made with the intention that it becomes binding”
“The existence of an offer is objectively assessed.” Which case?
Smith v Hughes
Goods on display in a shop window are invitations to treat. Which case?
Fisher v Bell
Boots Cash Chemist v Royal Pharmaceutical Society
Goods on shelves in shops are invitations to treat
Advertisements for rewards are unilateral offers.
Williams v Cawardine
Where the wording of an advertisement creates an action on the other side or reliance, it will be an offer.
Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball
Where an advertisement specifies a tender process would accept the highest offer, it is an offer.
Harvela
Aero Club
Invitations to tender that lay down a clear procedure are an offer to consider the tender.
Blackpool and Fylde Aero Club v
In auctions, the auctioneer is bound to accept the highest offer and can be sued by the offeree if they don’t.
Barry v Davies
An offer is revocable up to the point it is accepted
Routledge v Grant
For a revocation to be valid, it must be communicated.
Van Tienhoven
If a revocation is sent during office hours it can be assumed it was communicated.
The Brimnes
Revocation can be communicated through a third party.
Dickinson v Dodds
Hyde v Wrench. What is the ruling?
A counter offer destroys the original offer
If a statement is a request for more information, it will not destroy the offer
Stevenson Jacques v Maclean
Acceptance must be communicated
Entores v Miles Far East Corporation
The general rule is that acceptance must be communicated by the offeree or his authorised agent
Powell v Lee
If the postal rule applies the acceptance will be valid when posted.
Adams v Lindsell
Holwell Securities v Hughes
The offeror may exclude the postal rule.
The postal rule may apply even if the letter gets lost in the post
Household Fire Insurance Company v Grant
Can a term be implied in if it is necessary for the contract to make business sense?
Yes, the business efficacy rule in The Moorcock
Which implied test is this? “Is it something that if an officious bystander had asked at the time of contracting, both parties would have agreed to happily?”
Officious bystander test. Shirlaw v Southern Foundries
Innominate terms can be conditions if the breach is serious and warranties if it is not.
Hong Kong Fir Case
What are the 4 conditions for promissory estoppel to apply?
- The promisor must give a promise to waive a legal right
- The promisor must act upon that promise
- It must be inequitable for the promisor to insist on their original rights (D&C Builders v Rees)
- It is a shield not a sword.
For promissory estoppel to apply it must be inequitable for the promisor to insist on their original rights
D&C Builders v Rees
A promisor can regain their legal rights if they give reasonable notice
Tool Metal v Tungsten
Ajayi v Briscoe (Nigeria)
A strict legal right is extinguished where a party cannot resume their prior position.