How much influence had the working men and women of Britain achieved by 1870? Flashcards
What two main factors need to be discussed?
unionism and (co-operatives and friendly societies)
How should you approach this question?
Two sides to each factor
When was the TUC founded?
1868
How many members didi the TUC have?
More than 1 million
How can the TUC be described?
A vessel for representation
How did the TUC give workers influence?
This gave working people significant influence as the reduced role of the individual was then represented by a huge collective union, wielding huge influence against industrialists and dressing the failures of previous localised guilds and unions.
What was the TUC’s limitation?
Their limitation was that they are still not completely a unified group, it is merely a forum for many different unions to meet and discuss, so could not impose co-operation.
When was a general trades union established?
1834
How did a general trades union give workers more influence and address previous criticisms of unions?
Previously a limitation had been that unions and trade guilds had only been for skilled workers, whilst other were mere informal labour changes operating from pubs. This shows that the majority of working men and women, who were unskilled labourers, now had a vessel through which they could gain collectivised influence.
How did Chartism give workers more influence?
Chartism was a union in all but name and held their first convention in London in the winter of 1839.
Give an example of what the ASE did?
ASE supported builders in London with 3000 pounds, Wealthy. Successful union demonstrates departure from small, ill equipped unions.
What did the ASCJ demonstrate?
New model unionism was spreading across the country
Why were new model unions very significant?
They represented skilled workers whose professions were vital to the economic success of the country and the mid-victorian boom.
What had the government’s response to trade unions been before 1850?
Before 1850 the government response had been rather negative towards unionism as their laissez-faire economics meant that they sympathised with the employer rather than worker as they were making so much money for the country.
What did the repealing of the combination act in 1824 signify?
This would suggest that there was a more progressive attitude towards unionism in Britain, and that opportunities for greater political influence were slowly being granted.