Hoofstock & Megavertebrate Nutrition Flashcards
What disease problems of hoofstock have been associated with dietary causes?
Chronic weight loss
Rumen acidosis
Chronic weight loss
Rumen acidosis
Rumenitis
Laminitis
Hoof overgrowth
Periodontal disease
Fowler 6 - Nutrition of Browsers
How do ruminants obtain their energy?
Basic pathway for creating energy from food in a ruminant:
Forages are fermented by microbes in the ruminoreticulum → Produce fatty acids → Fatty acids provide energy to the ruminant
Why is healthy rumen flora important?
How can it be maintained?
What problems arise from an oversupply of simple carbohydrates?
Vertebrates and plant cell wall digestion:
- Vertebrates can’t digest plant cell walls on their own
- Rely on fermentation activity of symbiotic gut bacteria
Challenge is to maintain healthy stable gut flora
This is managed through:
- Maintaining a generous supply of high fiber feeds
- Restricting supply of highly digestible carbohydrates
- Problems with unrestricted carbohydrates
- If fed an oversupply of easily fermentable carbohydrates:
- Foregut fermenters tend to develop:
- Diarrhea
- Weight loss
- Hindgut fermenters tend to develop: Obesity
Define the terms browser and grazer
Grazer: Refers to a species that eats primarily monocotyledonous plants (ie: grasses)
Browser: Refers to a species that eats primarily dicotyledonous plants (ie: woody plants and shrubs)
How do browsers & grazers differ in obtainin their energy sources?
Name some species examples of each type.
What anatomical differences exist between browsers and grazers?
There are 8 of them.
What are the differences in digestibility, protein content, pectin content, and abrasive content in monocotyledon v dicotyledon plants?
How does browse differ from hay in terms of fermentation times?
How does this affect feeding hay to browsers?
Browse reaches maximum fermentation sooner than grass:
- Browsers have a shorter ingesta retention time than grazers, making them:Less efficient at digesting fiber. Therefore, a browser on hay alone would have to:
- Ingest relatively more hay than a grazer would to get the same nutrition
So why not just feed browsers more hay?
- Because browsers have a wimpy rumen:
- Browser rumen lacks the strong musculature of a grazer, therefore:
- They are unable to ingest enough grass to form a grass mat as is seen in grazers
- Because of this, browsers will preferentially avoid large amounts of grass
- In addition, overall rumen capacity is smaller, so can not ingest enough hay to meet their energy demands even if they were willing
- This makes it difficult for a browser to eat enough hay to survive on hay alone
Nondomestic ruminants often have problems with inverse calcium phosphorus ratios.
List 5 species that are commonly affected.
Inverse Ca: Phos ratios are common in a lot of zoo ruminants:
- Affects both browsers and grazers:
- However, common species with clinical signs are often browsers or intermediate feeders:
- Including:
- Kudu (Tragelaphus imberbis and T. strepsiceros)
- Nyala (Tragelaphus angasii)
- Eland (Taurotragus oryx)
- Bongo (Tragelaphus eurycerus)
- Giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis)
Need to pay close attention to calcium, phosphorus, and magnesium levels in the diet as these all affect the calcium to phosphorus ratios in the body.
Discuss the importance of pectins in the nondomestic ruminant diet.
Pectins: High energy source with less acidotic potential than grains
Pectins are found in higher levels in browse than in grasses
Commercially available pectins can also be used to replace grain / corn in pelleted rations as a good source of energy with less acidotic risk
Example of a commonly used pectin: Beet pulp
Discuss the abrasive potential of grass v browse.
How does grazer & browser dentition differ?
Abrasive potential of grass vs browse: Grass is generally more abrasive than browse due to a higher acid-insoluble ash content and higher silica content. Importance:
Grazer dentition: Hypsodont
- High crowned teeth designed for eating abrasive foods
- As the teeth grind the food, the tooth surface wears down
- Since the crown is high, it takes years to wear down the tooth to the point of dental disease
- Results in continual wear by abrasion
Browser dentition:Brachydont:
- Low crowned teeth not designed to handle abrasive foods
- Hardest thing they are meant to chew against is the opposing tooth surface
- Tooth surfaces are not intended to wear down smoothly
- Results in eventual wear by attrition, but slow process
A 2007 study evaluated the effects of wild and managed diets on giraffe dentition.
What did they find?
Clauss M, et al. 2007. Tooth wear in captive giraffes: mesowear analysis classifies freeranging specimens as browsers but captive ones as grazers. JZWM 38(3): 433-445.
- Looked at tooth wear in museum specimens: 20 free ranging and 41 captive giraffe
- Found that free-ranging giraffe had attrition wear, typical of a browsing species but captive giraffe had abrasion wear, typical of a grazing species.
- Suspected cause:
- Silica content higher in captive vs wild giraffe diets
- Captive diet is often low in browse (and alfalfa), but higher in grass hay and pelleted compounds
- Suspected cause:
- Importance: May related to shorter life span:
- Captive giraffe generally die around 15 years of age, don’t reach maximum life span of 26-30 years that is listed in the literature
- May be related to inability to utilize diet that is offered
How do browsers and grazers differ in regards to fecal particle size.
Importance of fecal particle size:
- Fecal particle size is a direct function of chewing (comminution) efficiency.
Hummel, J., J. Fritz, E. Kienzle, E. P. Medici, S. Lang, W. Zimmermann, W. J. Streich, and M. Clauss. 2008. Differences in fecal particle size between free-ranging and captive individuals of two browser species. Zoo Biol. 27: 70–77
- Evaluated feces from the following four captive and wild animals for mean fecal particle size
- Ruminant browser: Giraffe
- Ruminant grazer: Aurox (primitive cow)
- Non-ruminant browser: Tapir
- Non-ruminant grazer: Przewalksi’s horse
Results:
- Captive grazers had a smaller MPS than wild grazers
- Likely associated with pellets in captivity that are already ground
- Indicates that teeth of grazers are equally efficient at chewing captive and wild diet components
- Captive browsers had larger MPS than wild browsers
- Indicates that the teeth of browsers are less efficient at chewing captive diet components compared to wild diet components
- Roughage offered in zoos likely very different from natural diet
- Larger particles may contribute to bezoars and intestinal blockages
- Offering of roughage only diets in captivity to ruminant browsers may result in not enough energy intake b/c they are unable to break it down efficiently
Discuss the consequences of keeping a browser on a grazer diet long term.
Browsers kept on a grazer diet over a long period of time develop:
- More tooth wear than a grazer
- Less effective particle reduction leading to formation of phytobezoars
- If offered large amounts of concentrates:
- Tend to eat more concentrate and less grass leading to obesity and/or acidosis
- If offered large amounts of grasses and grass hay:
- Tend to end up in a negative energy balance due to inability to fully utilize grass plants
Describe the ideal ration for ungulate herbivores.
How does that differ for browzers and grazers?
Ideal Rations for all Ungulate Herbivores
- Should be composed of:
- Adequate roughage
- High fiber pellet
- Good pellet for any herbivore (including browsers) is one that:
- Is based on forage meal to ensure high fiber content
- Uses unmolassed beet pulp as an energy source
- Pelleted diet should not be composed of:
- Sugars and starches such as found in commercial fruits and grains
- Good pellet for any herbivore (including browsers) is one that:
Browser Example Recommendations
- Wild Herbivore Line:
- Mazuri’s diet for intermediate and browser herbivores
- Basic description:
- Starch content: Low (<4%)
- Fiber content: High (>20%)
- Recommended ration:
- 1.5 to 2.5% of BW per day in addition to:
- Grass or legume hay
- Supplemental browse
- 1.5 to 2.5% of BW per day in addition to:
Grazer Example Recommendations
- Commercial herbivore pellets (ex: ADF-16) containing:
- Protein at: 12-18%
- Acid detergent fiber at: 16-25%
- Easily digestible starches including:
- Alfalfa meal
- Yellow corn
- Wheat middlings
- Molasses
- Recommended ration:1% BW per day in addition to:
- Free choice grass hay