Hip Fracture Flashcards
Risk Factors
Osteoporosis, Gender, Age, Obesity, Height, Race, Smoking, Physical Activity, Parental hip fracture, diabetes
Types of Hip Fractures
Intracapsular and Extracapsular
Intracapsular Fracture
- Involve femoral head or neck
- Higher rate of non-union and AVN
- Subcapital, Transcervical, Basicervial
Extracapsular Fracture
Involve trochanteric region
- Trochanteric, Intertrochanteric, Subtrochanteric
Staging of Hip Fractures - Garden Staging System
Stage 1 - Incomplete, may be impacted
Stage 2 - Complete, non-displaced
Stage 3 - Complete, partially displaced
Stage 4 - Complete, fully displaced
Fracture Management
Reduction, Fixation, Restoration of function
Overall Goals
- Pain control
- Reduction and fixation in good position
- Return to function
- Prevent complications
Conservative Treatment
- Unstable medical status
- Non-displaced fractures
- Risks of surgery vs. risks of immobility
Surgical Treatment
- ORIF vs HA vs THA
2. Consideration given to: Age, Mobility Status, Mental State, Pre-existing bone and joint pathology
ORIF (Open Reduction Internal Fixation, aka - pinning, nailing)
- Bone conserving
- Higher failure rate
- Suggested for younger, highly active patients
- Extracapsular fracture
HA - Hemiarthroplasty
There is no acetabular component involved
- Intracapsular fracture
- Appear to have better outcomes than ORIF
- Lower failure rate
- Risk of dislocation
- Deterioration of fxn after 3-5 years
Unipolar Prosthesis
Femoral head articulates with acetabulum, but is fixed to stem
Bipolar Prosthesis
Femoral head articulates with both acetabulum and stem
No evidence comparing uni vs. bi
Cemented vs. Non-cemented
- Possible intra-operative morbidity with cement
2. Uncemented stems have been linked to greater pain and poorer overall function
THA - Total Hip Arthroplasty
- Considered for intracapsular fracture
- Surgical skill is key
- Better outcomes than HA
- Risk of dislocation