Hall Book Ch 6 (Oxygen Effect and Reoxygenation) Flashcards
Several chemical and pharmacologic agents that modify the biologic effect of
ionizing radiations have been discovered. None is simpler than oxygen, none
produces such a dramatic effect, and, as it turns out, no other agent has
such obvious practical implications.
The oxygen effect was observed as early as 1912 in Germany by Swartz, who noted that the skin reaction produced on his forearm by a radium applicator was ( ) if the applicator was pressed hard onto the skin.
He attributed this to the interruption in ( ). By 1921, it had been noted by Holthusen that Ascaris eggs were relatively resistant to radiation in the absence of (
), a result wrongly attributed to the absence of cell division under these conditions.
reduced, blood flow, oxygen
The correlation between ( ) and the presence of ( ) was made by Petry in 1923 from a study of the effects of radiation on vegetable seeds. All of these results were published in the German literature but were apparently little known in the English-speaking world.
radiosensitivity, oxygen
In England in the 1930s, Mottram explored the question of oxygen in detail,
basing his investigations on work of Crabtree and Cramer on the survival of
tumor slices irradiated in the ( ) of oxygen.
He also discussed the importance of these findings to radiotherapy. Mottram began a series of experiments that culminated in a quantitative measurement of the ( ) effect by his colleagues Gray and Read, using as a biologic test system the growth inhibition of the primary root of the broad bean Vicia faba.
presence or absence, oxygen
Survival curves for mammalian cells exposed to x-rays in the presence and
absence of oxygen are illustrated in Figure 6.1.
The ratio of ( ) is called the oxygen enhancement ratio (OER).
doses administered under hypoxic to aerated conditions needed to achieve the same biologic effect
For sparsely ionizing radiations, such as x- and γ-rays, the OER at high doses has a value of between ( ).
The OER has been determined for various chemical and biologic systems with
different end points, and its value for x- and γ-rays always tends to fall in this
range.
There is some evidence that for ( ) growing cells cultured in vitro, the
OER has a smaller value of about ( ) at lower doses, on the order of the daily
dose per fraction generally used in radiotherapy.
2.5 and 3.5, rapidly, 2.5
This is believed to result from the variation of OER with the phase of the cell cycle: Cells in G1 phase have a ( ) OER than those in S, and because G1 cells are more ( ), they dominate the low-dose region of the survival curve.
For this reason, the OER of an asynchronous population is slightly ( ) at low doses than at high doses. This result has been demonstrated for fast-growing cells cultured in vitro, for which precise survival measurements are possible, but would be difficult to show in a tissue.
lower, radiosensitive, smaller
There is some evidence also that for cells in culture, the survival curve has a complex shape for doses less than ( ) Gy. What effect, if any, this has on the ( ) is not yet clear.
1, OER
FIGURE 6.1 Cells are much more ( ) to x-rays in the presence of molecular oxygen than in its absence (i.e., under hypoxia).
The ratio of doses under hypoxic to aerated conditions necessary to produce the same level of cell killing is called the oxygen enhancement ratio (OER).
It has a value close to ( ) at ( ) doses (A) but may have a lower value of about 2.5 at x-ray doses less than about 2 to 3 Gy (B). (Adapted from Palcic B, Skarsgard LD. Reduced oxygen enhancement ratio at low doses of ionizing radiation. Radiat Res.
1984;100:328–339, with permission.)
sensitive, 3.5, high
Figure 6.2 illustrates the oxygen effect for other types of ionizing radiations. For a ( ) ionizing radiation, such as ( ), the survival curve does not have an ( )
In this case, survival estimates made in the presence or absence of oxygen fall along a common line; the OER is unity— in other words, there is ( ).
densely, low-energy α-particles, initial shoulder, no oxygen effect
For radiations of ( ) ionizing density, such as ( ), the survival curves have a much ( ) shoulder. In this case, the oxygen effect is apparent, but it is much ( ) than is the case for x-rays. In the example shown in Figure 6.2, the OER for neutrons is about ( ).
intermediate, neutrons, reduced, smaller, 1.6
FIGURE 6.2 The oxygen enhancement ratio (OER) for various types of radiation. A: X-rays exhibit a ( ) OER of ( ).
B: Neutrons (15-MeV d+ → T) are between these extremes, with an OER of ( ).
C: The OER for low-energy α-particles is unity. (Adapted from Barendsen GW, Koot CJ, van Kersen GR, et al.
The effect of oxygen on impairment of the proliferative capacity of human cells
in culture by ionizing radiations of different ( ). Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud
Phys Chem Med. 1966;10:317–327; and Broerse JJ, Barendsen GW, van Kersen
GR. Survival of cultured human cells after irradiation with fast neutrons of
different energies in hypoxic and oxygenated conditions. Int J Radiat Biol Relat
Stud Phys Chem Med. 1968;13:559–572, with permission.)
larger, 2.5, 1.6, LET
In summary, the oxygen effect is large and important in the case of ( ) ionizing radiations, such as ( ); is absent for ( ) ionizing radiations, such as ( ); and has an intermediate value for ( ).
sparsely, x-rays, densely, α-particles, fast neutrons
For the oxygen effect to be observed, oxygen must be present during the
radiation exposure or, to be precise, during or within ( ) after the radiation exposure.
Sophisticated experiments have been performed in which oxygen, contained in a chamber at high pressure, was allowed to “explode” onto a single layer of bacteria (and later mammalian cells) at various times before or after irradiation with a 2-μ electron pulse from a linear accelerator.
It was found that oxygen need not be present during the irradiation to sensitize but could be ( ), provided the delay was not too long. Some sensitization occurred with oxygen added as late as ( ) after irradiation.
microseconds, added afterward, 5 milliseconds
Experiments such as these shed some light on the mechanism of the oxygen effect. There is general agreement that oxygen acts at the level of the ( ).
free radicals
The chain of events from the absorption of radiation to the final expression of biologic damage has been summarized as follows:
- The absorption of radiation leads to the production of ( ) particles.
- The charged particles, in passing through the biologic material, produce several (
). - These ion pairs have very short life spans (about 10^−10 second) and produce free
radicals, which are highly reactive molecules because they have an ( ) electron.
fast-charged, ion pairs, unpaired valence
The free radicals are important because although their life spans are only about ( ) second, that is appreciably longer than that of the ion pairs. To a large extent, it is these free radicals that ( ) that result in the final expression of biologic damage; however, it has been observed that the extent of the damage depends on the presence or absence of ( ).
10^−5, break chemical bonds, produce chemical changes, and initiate the chain of events
oxygen
If molecular ( ) is present, DNA reacts with the free radicals (R·). The DNA radical can be chemically restored to its reduced form through reaction with a ( ) group.
oxygen, sulfhydryl (SH)
However, the formation of RO2·, an ( ), represents a ( ) form of the target material; that is, the reaction results in a change in the chemical composition of the material exposed to the radiation.
This reaction cannot take place in the absence of ( ); since then, many of the ionized target molecules are able to repair themselves and recover the ability to function normally. In a sense, then, oxygen may be said to “fix” or make permanent the radiation lesion. This is known as the ( ). The process is illustrated in Figure 6.3.
organic peroxide, nonrestorable
oxygen, oxygen fixation hypothesis
FIGURE 6.3 ( ). About ( ) of the biologic damage produced by x-rays is by indirect action mediated by ( ). The damage produced by free radicals in DNA can be repaired under ( ) but may be “fixed” (made permanent and irreparable) if molecular oxygen is available.
The oxygen fixation hypothesis, two-thirds, free radicals, hypoxia
A question of obvious importance is the concentration of oxygen required to
potentiate the effect of radiation. Is the amount required small or large?
Many investigations have been performed using bacteria, plants, yeast, and mammalian cells, and the similarities between them are ( ).
The simple way to visualize the effect of oxygen is by considering the change of slope of the mammalian cell survival curve.
Figure 6.4 is a dramatic representation of what happens to the survival curve in the (
) of oxygen.
Curve A is characteristic of the response under conditions of equilibration with ( ).
Curve B is a survival curve for irradiation in as low a level of ( ) as usually can be obtained under experimental conditions (10 ppm of oxygen in the gas phase). The introduction of a very small quantity of oxygen, 100 ppm, is readily noticeable in a change in the slope of the survival curve.
A concentration of 2,200 ppm, which is about 0.22% oxygen, moves the survival curve about halfway toward the fully aerated condition.
striking, presence of various concentrations, air, hypoxia
FIGURE 6.4 Survival curves for Chinese hamster cells exposed to x-rays in the
presence of various oxygen concentrations.
Open circles, air (A); closed circles, 2,200 ppm of oxygen or pO2 of 1.7 mm Hg; open squares, 355 ppm of oxygen or pO2 of 0.25 mm Hg; closed squares, 100 ppm of oxygen or pO2 of 0.075 mmHg; open triangles, 10 ppm of oxygen or pO2 of 0.0075 mm Hg (B), which corresponded to the lowest level of hypoxia that could usually be obtained under
experimental conditions. (Adapted from Elkind MM, Swain RW, Alescio T, et
al. Oxygen, nitrogen, recovery and radiation therapy. In: Shalek R, ed. Cellular
Radiation Biology. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1965:442–466, with
permission.)
Other experiments have shown that, generally, by the time a concentration of
oxygen corresponding to ( )% has been reached, the survival curve is virtually
indistinguishable from that obtained under conditions of ( ).
2, normal aeration
Furthermore, increasing the amount of oxygen present from that characteristic of air to ( )% oxygen ( ) the slope of the curve. This has led to the more usual “textbook representation” of the variation of radiosensitivity with oxygen concentration as shown in Figure 6.5.
100, does not further affect
The term used here to represent ( ) is proportional to the reciprocal of the ( ) of the survival curve. It is arbitrarily assigned a value of unity for ( ) conditions.
radiosensitivity, D0, anoxic
As the oxygen concentration increases, the biologic material becomes progressively more ( ) to radiation, until, in the presence of 100% oxygen, it is about ( ) times
as sensitive as under complete anoxia.
Note that the rapid change of radiosensitivity occurs as the partial pressure of oxygen (pO2) is increased from 0 to about ( ).
A further increase in oxygen tension to an atmosphere of pure oxygen has little, if any, further effect.
sensitive, 3, 30 mm Hg (5% oxygen)