groups and teams Flashcards

1
Q

Schein’s (1980) definition of a group

A

A group is a number of people who

interact with each other;

are psychologically aware of each other;

perceive themselves to be a group.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Brill’s (1976) Definition of ‘a team’

A

A team is a group of people, each of whom possesses particular expertise; each of whom is responsible for making individual decisions; who together hold a common purpose; who meet together to communicate, collaborate and consolidate knowledge, from which plans are made, actions determined and future decisions influenced.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Stages of team development
(Tuckman 1965, Tuckman and Jensen, 1977

A
  1. Orientation: Why am I here?
  2. Trust Building: Who are you
  3. Goal/Role Clarification: What are we doing?
  4. Commitment: How?
  5. Implementation: Who does What, When, Where
  6. High Performance: How?
  7. Renewal: Why continue ?

first 4 are creating stages where theyre forming between stage 1 and 2 and storming in stage three the last 3 are sustaining stages where between 4 and 5 theyre norming and betwen 6 and 7 are performing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

characteristics of forming

A

Individualistic

People withhold full participation

Trust: wait and see

Management give no real authority to act

Mission is understood, but does not motivate

Communication from leader to members, rather than members to members, little listening

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

characteristics of storming

A

Honeymoon is over, energy dissipating

Stress over roles, over uneven contribution

Trust: working out who to trust

Purpose: slowly becoming clear

Communication: often aggressive

Team processes start to be worked on

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

characteristics of norming

A

Informal experts emerge; team over-rely on them

Swear allegiance to team / team pride; rivalry with other teams

Reluctant to challenge others

Trust: developing, but not tested

Clear focus on performance and goals

Communication to each other as well as to leader

Team processes well underway

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

characteristics of performing

A

Team is pro-active; sets most of its own priorities

Team seek wider business info & involvement

Strong culture of “high accountability”

Team share leadership: all involved

Team priorities what is good for the business as a whole

Trust high: climate of support and challenge

Team manages its performance as a team.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Application of Tuckmans theory

A

promote effectiveness of work groups

starting point for team development practitioners

understanding team processes across different organisations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Critical evaluation of Tuckman’s Stages of Team Development Theory

A

Limitations of model: no representative sample of settings where small group development processes are likely to occur.

Lack of quantitative research / The model was based on a literature review and observation of a limited number of small group settings

Recent theories recognize the complexity of group dynamics in today’s world and are not easily represented in a simple model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Belbin (1981) team roles

A

they are 9 roles in a team that belbin belived where needed for an efficient team, they are split into three broad groups: people orientated, cerebral and action

Are about behavioural preferences, not a personality profile

Most individuals are capable of playing more than one role

You don’t ‘give’ people a Belbin role

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

bellmans people oriented roles are..

A

coordinator
team worker
resource investigator

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what does the coordinator role do?

A

can be mature, confident and clarifies goals, promotes decision making and a good delegator, identify talents

allowable weaknesses: however can often be seen as manipulative and offload work to others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what does the team-worker role do?

A

they are very cooperative and diplomatic, they listen and build with the team

allowable weaknesses: however can be indecisive in crunch situations when decisions must be made

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what does the resource investigator do?

A

they are enthusiastic and communicative, outgoing and confident, they explore opportunities and develop contacts

allowable weaknesses: however they may be over optimistic of the outcome of the tasks and lose interest as they lose initial enthusiasm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what are bellmans cerebral (thinking) roles?

A

plant
monitor evaluator
specialist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what does the plant role do?

A

they are the problem solver who are creative and imaginative. they are often unorthodox but solve difficult problems

allowable weaknesses: however they may be forgetful and absent minding as they may ignore incidentals (small problems), they are also too occupied to communicate well

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

what is the monitor evaluator role?

A

they are strategic and discerning, they offer a logical eye and look at things objectively, they are unemotional and see all options and judge accurately

allowable weaknesses: however lack the drive and ability to inspire others

18
Q

what is the specialist role?

A

they are single minded (focus on one thing) and self starting as well as dedicated to their task due to knowledge and skills in rare supply in their area

allowable weaknesses: however may contribute on a narrow front and dwell on technicalities

19
Q

what is the action/task roles?

A

shaper
implementer
completer/finisher

20
Q

what is the shaper role?

A

they thrive under pressure and are dynamic and challenge others and like to be challenged they have the courage o overcome obstacles

allowable weaknesses: however they are prone provocation and may offend peoples feelings

21
Q

what is the implementer role?

A

they are disciplined and reliable as well as conservative and efficient, they turn ideas into practical actions, they ensure plans get carried out

allowable weaknesses: however slow to respond to new possibilities and somewhat inflexible

22
Q

what is the completer/ finisher role?

A

they are painstaking concientious and anxious, they search for errors and deliver on time they are pulled in towards the end of the task and make sure the work is completed to the highest order

allowable weaknesses: however they are inclined to worry and reluctant to delegate

23
Q

What is a team role?

A

“A tendency to behave, contribute and interrelate with others in a particular way.“ (Belbin, 1981)

24
Q

Application of belbins team theory

A

Should NOT be used for recruitment and selection

Only as a tool for awareness of own strengths and abilities, and understanding own role within a team helps to deal better with the demands of the team environment

It IS possible for someone with a Belbin team role preference of (for example) Resource Investigator to be the chair – they will just do it differently

25
Q

what would you need if there was Underachievement in the team?

A

a shaper

26
Q

what would you need if there was Late projects
in the team?

A

team needs a completer/finisher

27
Q

what would you need if there was Conflict in the team?

A

more teamworkers or a strong coordinator

28
Q

what would you need if there was Satisficing in the team?

A

resource investiagtor, plant or monitor evaluator

28
Q

what would you need if there was Mistakes prone
in the team?

A

a monitor evaluator

29
Q

According to Belbin, each member performs two roles being…

A

A functional role (professional knowledge)
A team role (pattern of team interaction)

The team needs an optimal balance in both functional & team roles. That balance is dependent on the goals & tasks that the team faces.

The effectiveness of the team will be promoted by the extent to which members correctly recognise and adjust themselves to the relative strengths of the team, both in expertise and ability to engage in specific team roles

30
Q

Critical evaluation of Belbin’s team roles

A

Discriminant validity i.e. overlap between the roles (but good according to van Dierendock & Groen, 2008)

Reductionist – we are more than team roles

The interaction between situation and team task requirements needs to be better understood: Which roles required for which task in which situation?

Behaviour can change depending on the situation i.e. people have agency (it’s interesting to note that teams with ‘intelligent’ members tend to perform better – maybe because they are adapting their behaviour to the situation)

31
Q

4 Factors affecting group cohesiveness and performance

A

Membership: size of the group, compatibility of members, permanence

Organisation: leadership, HR policies and procedures, success, threat

Work environment: nature of the task, physical setting, communications, technology

Group development: forming, storming, norming, performing

32
Q

Pros of Decision Making in Teams

A

More information from different sources

Mutually acceptable solution

Credibility / legitimacy of solution

Commitment towards implementation

33
Q

Cons of Decision Making in Teams

A

Pressures to conform

Groupthink

Extreme-decisions: e.g. polarised

Takes more time

Lines of responsibility can become unclear

Social loafing

34
Q

what is groupthink?

A

“…is the psychological drive for consensus at any cost that suppresses dissent and appraisal of alternatives in cohesive decision-making groups.” (Janis, 1982)

Occurs when:
“…powerful members of the group…coerce less powerful group members to go along with a decision in public even though they may disagree in private.” (Dyer, 1998)

35
Q

what study does group think link to?

A

Conformity Experiments(Asch, 1951) which shows that if a group thinks something then its likely your opinion or answer will change in order to conform with the majority or a group leader

36
Q

Symptoms of Groupthink

A
  1. Illusion of invulnerability
  2. Collective rationalization
  3. belief in inherent morality
  4. Stereotyped views of out-groups
  5. Direct pressure on dissenters
  6. Self-censorship
  7. Illusion of unanimity
  8. Self-appointed mind-guards
37
Q

what are some suggestions to minimising groupthink (janis 1972)

A

Impartial leader

Critical evaluators

Devil’s advocate

Subgroup for policy evaluation

‘Second chance’ meeting

Group norm – disagreement does not mean disrespect

Climate of constructive controversy e.g. get someone to support a minority viewpoint

38
Q

how does groupthink like to group cohesiveness

A

High group cohesiveness is associated with more symptoms of groupthink than low group cohesiveness (Park, 2000)

39
Q

what is group polarisation?

A

“Groups tend to make more extreme decisions than we might expect, given the initial preferences of group members”

(Bettenhausen, 1991)

40
Q

why does group polarisation occur?

A

social comparison (we like to present ourselves in a socially desirable way)

persuasive argumentation (information consistent with the views held by the majority will dominate the group discussion)

(Isenberg, 1986)