Group therapy justice settings Flashcards
Why do therapy in groups?
- Efficient cost-effective
- Form relationships with others
- See how people interact with each other
- Skills more easily practised
Process vs task
- Structured = content, strategies, skills specific to CBT, little attention to process
Setting - Process = taking care of the group, focusing on here and now, group interaction seen as a vehicle of change
- Group Process can add value by:
o facilitating self-disclosure,
o attendance (come for others, don’t want to miss out),
o access “hot” interpersonal cognitions (see them in the room – social anxiety, anger etc),
o ready behavioural experiments and surveys (role play, BE),
o shifting self-focus (being able to help others),
o normalise struggles and concerns - Should use the process to enhance the structure, analogous to CBT get them in touch with emotions not just psychoeducation (?)
Group consideration
- Setting:
: preparation, expectations, practicalities
o safety, the make-up of the group, seating arrangements, access to exit, recourses, cultural greetings kia etc, consider each individual unique formulation, need, personality etc.
Group consideration
- Relationship
- Multiple relationships + dynamic (not just one therapist and one client)
- Baggage = everyone + therapist brings own baggage
- History in groups – everyone has a role in groups based on past experiences (leader, facilitator etc)
- Transference
- therapist needs to help form relationships “ how about asking one of the group members”, “I noticed you nodding as __ was speaking, do you want to share”, get them into pairs to discuss etc
Group consideration
- Group tone
- Each group on any day has an unspoken emotional tone (vibe), reflective, nervous, warm, excited
- Often we don’t tune in but that can be a lost opportunity to get hot cognitions, we need to be comfortable in that space to discuss these
Group consideration
- Creating the safe environment
- Feel safe to discuss anything
- Therapist characteristics: Warmth, humour, sincerity, honesty
- Impede: confrontation, cold, no direction, inflexible (same as always)
- Need to think about how we come across
Group consideration
- Ground rules
- Discuss early, set collaboratively, and discuss appropriate actions if someone is not adhering
- Ideas of rules: attending, being on time, confidentiality, treating with respect, no judgment
Group sessions - order - agenda
- Warm-up (linked to purpose) – can be a simple mood check, get them to talk to someone different, get up and move around – “discuss characteristics of diff groups u have been in and what made a good group”
- Body of work - Psychoeducation
- Integration sharing – always leave time for reflection and sharing,
Group stages- COULD BE IN EXAM HAS A READING
- Forming – people originally polite, small talk can be in honeymoon period – people feel different things (excitement, nervous, observing),
o Therapist’s role is to make people engaged and feel included - Storming – People get into work + roles ‘where do I sit in this group’ arguments arise from things unsaid or unnoticed in the forming stage, people can compete over roles esp. if no clear roles
o The therapist needs to assert their role and get people involved, clarify goals and use team rules that were set - Norming – Trying to get balance for structure and process
- Performing – people leaving performing to take it all in and can feel like a happy family – conflict is managed
- Adjourning – when it comes to an end can be scary for people
o Need change management and to talk about it, plan for moving forward
Conflict + addressing conflict
- Conflict is expected and can be a good thing
- If conflict lacking may suggest apathy, disregard, or members feeling unsafe
- If unaddressed can escalate/lead to poor dynamic
- The therapist needs not just avoid conflict
Addressing conflict - Early action – open up the subject and encourage sharing
- Encourage to separate actions from feelings
- Re-oreint the group with rules (respect etc)
- Give the other party a chance to respond
- Can give them space to figure it out but keep a close eye on the situation
Yalom’s 11 factors (rough - didnt really cover in class)
- Hope
- Helping others
- Psychoeducation
- Altruism
- Social skills
- Modelling
- Listening
- Need to take responsibility over our lives
- Cohesiveness
- Johari window
- Cohesiveness
a. Encompasses all the relationships within the group
b. If a cohesive group then should feel warmth, comfort, belonging, value and feel valued, accepted, supported
c. More cohesive = higher rates of attendance, participation, support
d. E.g., can achieve this through exercises like the yarn video we watched in class where they found things that connected them
- Johari window
a. expand 1 , 2 smaller = feedback from others
b. expand 1, 3 smaller = self-disclosure
c. make 4 smaller = shared discovery
d. Can share this with group for rational
Focal conflict model
diffintations + examples
- The conflict between disturbing motive and reactive motive leads to anxiety so want to work toward a solution to deal with this
- Disturbing motive = shared wish or impulse/common wish by the group
- Reactive motive = shared fear or guilt which is in conflict with the disturbing motive
- Solutions = develop through the interaction of group members and function to deal with the associated group focal conflict
o Restrictive solution = If the solution only deals with fear at the expense of the wish (pushing things under the rug)
o Enabling solution = if solution deals with fear + allows for the expression of wish - Example 1
o Disturbing motive = members want to share their emotions
o Reactive motive = fear of rejection
o Restrictive solution = don’t share emotion.
o Enabling solution = to talk about feelings and fears of sharing them - Example 2
o Disturbing motive = shared feelings of anger towards the therapist
o Reactive motive = fear of abandonment by therapist
o Restrictive solution = supress anger to keep them happy
o Enabling solution = talk to therapist about it