Global Politics Flashcards
Realism
Belief in international anarchy and the security dilemma from the build up in weapons - Hans Morgenthau unitary actor
- Nation states are the most important actors
- No other actor has the authority or control to limit the behaviour of nation states
- Since global relations are anarchic there is ‘no night watchman’ (John Mearsheimer) to maintain order
- Since the highest goal is for a nation state is survival liberal principles are irrelevant and possibly dangerous
Liberalism
Joseph Nye ‘complex web of interdependence’
- Human nature is rational and cooperative rather than aggressive and egotistical.
- Conflict is not inevitable because nation states can make the rational decision to cooperate rather than aggressively seek power
- International organisations and the international rule of law provide a framework for states to resolve collective dilemmas together.
- Human rights, free trade and liberal democracy encourage cooperation and reduce the risk of nation states acting aggressively
- Globalisation and regionalism provide important opportunities for nation states to cooperate with other nation states and non-state actors
Realism vs Liberalism (human nature)
- People therefore states are rational, amoral actors / People therefore states look to help each other as they are good natured
- People therefore states are fixed unitary actors with unchanging desires / People therefore states have fraternal bonds do not have fixed interests
- People therefore states seek power after power and are drawn to conflict / People do not only seek power conflict can be resolved
Realism vs Liberalism (power)
- Power is finite (explain zero sum game) / Power is infinite
- States are solely power maximisers (explain unitary actors) / Other power maximisers + also seek other things
- IGOs decrease power / IGOs increase power
Realism vs Liberalism (security)
- State security is primary as other states are power maximisers / States look for cooperation
- Order+Security is achieved through military (explain international anarchy) / Can be achieved through IGOs
- Order+Security important as humans crave protection in a state / Humans want cooperation
Realism vs Liberalism (conflict)
- Conflict is inevitable due to states being power maximisers / Nations influenced by other things
- Conflict is a natural position due to international anarchy / While peace is not default can be achieved through Kantian Triangle (Democracy, Economic Independence, IGOs)
- IGOs do not reduce conflict / IGOs do reduce conflict (1960 600,000 casualties in war 2006 10,000)
Realism vs Liberalism (IGOs)
- IGOs infringe on SS / They do not
- IGOs achieve nothing in reducing conflict / They do
- IGOs are doomed to fail and will be used selfishly by states / they will not
Realism vs Liberalism (significance of states)
- States provide the only source of security / IGOs do as well
- States are primary in the international order / States share importance
- States decide human rights / they are unalienable
Sovereignty/nation state
Internal sovereignty is the ability to govern independently / External sovereignty is the recognition of each other’s sovereignty
- Defined external borders
e.g. Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic recognised by 46 states but no fully recognised due to border dispute with Morocco, Northern Cyprus and Cyprus
- Population defined by citizenship and nationality
e.g. Tuareg people semi-nomadic Berber people in northern Mali, Kosovo not fully recognised in part due to the split between serbs and croats
- Government with authority
e.g. in 2015 ISIS controlled 60% of Syria, Sudan split between the RSF, SAF, and regional rebels
- Ability to form relationships with other states
e.g. ASEAN, USMCA
Is State sovereignty an outdated concept
- State borders are becoming less significant with increasing flow of migration
e.g. in 2020 there were 281mn migrants, migrants in Asia have increased from 48.2mn to 85.6mn
However, borders still define the territory of independent states which retain - UN requirement Sahrawi
- Violent non state actors are frequently challenging state sovereignty
e.g. in 2015 ISIS controlled 60% of Syria, Hezbollah operates both a Shiite political group in Lebanon and a military group, Hezbollah controls majority Shiite regions such as southern Lebanon parts of Beirut and eastern Bekka Valley
- violent non state actors are not taking over territory on a wide spread scale
- Economic globalisation is reducing the importance of borders in the global economy
e.g. international financial assets rose by $23.3 trn in 2020-2021 year, only 16 nations who are not observers or distinct members of the WTO
states still have control over many policy areas
Biden IRA, UK withdrawal from Europe
Cultural globalisation (strengths)
- Good for economy - migration (a form of cultural globalisation) allows for technological advancements to quickly spread and more labour
e.g. 1990 2.6mn people had internet access 2023 4bn, immigrants from outside the Eu made a net fiscal contribution of 5.2 bn in 2023 to UK
- Spread of western ideals of liberal democracy - When the Soviet Union fell. Satellite republics were exposed to western ideals and made the transition due to the effective nature of cultural globalisation. This allows for better civil liberties.
e.g. number of closed autocracies went from 48% in 1980 to 18% 2024, over 3bn live under some form of open democracy
- Cultural Coexistence - better understanding of cultures leads to more peace.
Cultural globalisation (weaknesses)
- Migrant labour is exploited - 50% of people in the Gulf States are Indian migrants. Around 10,000 migrant workers from Asia dies every year in the nations of the Gulf Cooperation council.
- Cultural Homogenisation - western dominance culturally creates a homogenisation which is disproportionately caused through meaningless consumerism. Mcdonalds, Apple I phones, commercial cultural products
- Cultural coexistence is facing a backlash
Brexit, rise of the AFD and 2024 EU election results in which ID gained second most seats
Political Globalisation (strengths)
- Reduces conflicts - political globalisation has led to an easier connection of states through IGOs. This in effect weakens the security dilemma.
e.g. 2022 141 nations voted for Russias hostilities to cease, 2021 84,000 deaths in state based conflicts 1981 200,000
- Deals through problems through NGOs
e.g. WPHF in DRC have supported seven projects on post-conflict recovery, SUDO resumed in Sudan august 2019
- Give every state a voice - allows for greater transfer of ideas which strengthens all states and increases scrutiny of actions
Political globalisation (weaknesses)
- Does not reduce conflict - infringes on state sovereignty and is used for states to maximise power
e.g. in 2016 more countries experienced violent conflict than in the past 30 years, failure to react to Russia
- Lacks accountability - leaders of IGOs are elected by nations but not by people - sometimes worse they are western dominated
e.g. US veto in IMF and World Bank
- IGOs just used by superpowers - for there own gain and smaller states are overruled by P5.
e.g. April 2024 US vetoed Palestinian statehood, March 2024 Russia vetoed the extension of the mandate for North Korean sanctions
Economic globalisation (strengths)
- Greater goods and services, jobs -
e.g. benefits of lower prices helped EU consumers by €600, $5trn traded each day
- Reduces conflict - dell theory
e.g. China US trade 2022 $758.4bn, RCEP 2020 SEA
- Reduction in global poverty -
2024 Vietnamese workers employed by TNCs are in the top 20% of earners in their nation,
Economic globalisation (weaknesses)
- Abuse of labour, ecological damage -
e.g. 60% of amazon deforestation is for cattle growth, 2.5mn tonnes a year is from pirate fishing in south east asia
- Contagion of instability -
Covid led to a 7% drop in global commerce in 2020, by 2023 Russia ukraine war had caused a 1% reduction in GDP
- Rising inequality -
Gini Index of inequality has decreased marginally from 39.6 to 38.6, rust belt cities such as pittsburgh and buffalo have seen a 40% reduction in population 1970
Globalisation perspectives
- Hyperglobalists globalisation is inevitable as a consequence of advances in technology. Humankind is entering a new and unprecedented age of interconnectivity and interdependence. Eventually, the world will become borderless and nation-states will cease to be relevant as we will have a single monocultural global nation; a single interlinked global economy; and a single global political sovereign.
- Sceptics - much of globalisation is a myth and argue that the so-called integrated global economy does not exist. In reality, regional, national and local economies are more significant. Cultural homogenisation is also limited in scope and will face an inevitable backlash. Sceptics further argue that international trade and capital flows are not new phenomena – they have been happening for millennia.
- Transformationalists - middle ground. They acknowledge that significant changes have occurred due to globalisation, but that they have not fundamentally changed the Westphalian system of sovereign states. Interconnectedness has increasing in breadth, intensity and speed. The governments of individual nation-states are perhaps becoming less important, but this is because they voluntarily submit to the process of globalisation, recognising that it is in both mutual and individual states’ interests. They can equally voluntarily reverse this integration.
UNSC (strengths)
- Accurately represents reality of power - P5 are distinguished by their nuclear weapons (only 4 states outside have nuclear weapons), by having most powerful states in UNSC means more likely to succeed
e.g. USAID extends to more than 80 countries, CFA franc
- Can act collaboratively
e.g. MINUSCA UNSC current mission supported 15000 troops, MONUSCO since 1999
- Veto - encourages consensus, prevents unilateralism
e.g. the UN is split use of veto encourages interaction between nations
UNSC (weaknesses)
- Unrepresentative composition - Asia have 1 member for 59% of population, Only 3/5 are true democracies
- Internal rivalries cripple efficacy -
e.g. US april 2024 veto of Palestinian statehood, march 2024 non proliferation DPRK
- Difficult to reform - Veto means no one will dilute power
e.g. in 2011 Russia and China supported India’s UNSC bid
UNGA (Strengths)
- Global Forum - A space for multilateral action
e.g. 2022 UNGA established ‘Our Common Agenda’ which sought to reaffirm the social contract, a focus on future generations, protect global commons and global public goods, upgraded UN
- Equal Representation - Assembly provides one vote per nation, allows smaller nations to be heard
e.g. Antigua and Barbuda pop of 93,000 China 1.4bn, president of the 71st UNGA session came from Fiji
- Promotes dialogue - Reduces chance of conflict by allowing states to understand each others positions.
For example, number of interstate wars has decreased since 1945. 2021 84,000 deaths in state based conflicts 1981 200,000
UNGA (weaknesses)
- Poor effectiveness in global forum
- Antonio Gutierres
“I am personally devastated that despite our best efforts, we could not protect our personnel in Gaza.”
UNFEP said that progress on reforestation had not been reliably achieved
- Represents states not people (population)
e.g. China
- Merely a talking shop -
2022 141 nations voted for Russias hostilities to cease, UN condemned Israel 14 times in 2023
ICJ (facts)
Composed of 15 judges elected for 9 year terms
Role of ICJ is to settle disputes and give legal advice to UN agencies
Will only make judgements if all states agree to abide by ruling
Rulings are binding and can be enforced by UNSC
Advisory opinions are not binding but respected
ICJ (strengths)
- Upholds international law - conflict resolution and maintenance of international community.
e.g. Feb 2022 Uganda has begun paying its $325mn settlement to DRC, 2024 case on Russia against the financing of terrorism and the prevention of Ukrainian identity in Crimea
- UNSC enforces rulings
e.g. Bolivia’s costal claim in Chile
- Reduces conflict - ICJ allows states to back down from conflict. E.g. Preah Vihear Hindu Temple on Thai-Cambodian border was a source of conflict ICJ arbitration 1962
ICJ (weaknesses)
- Jurisdiction is conditional - both states have to agree.
e.g. Feb 2024 Human Rights Watch says ICJ was not complying to prevent genocide, Application of the CERD (Armenia v. Azerbaijan) [2021-2023]
- Unenforceable rulings - rulings unenforceable against those in UNSC.
e.g. e.g. 2018 Iran filed ICJ suite against US sanctions ICJ ruled in Iranian favour, 2016 Against China’s right to South China Sea
- Unable to solve intra state conflict - due to state sovereignty harder to have rulings inside a state
RSF SAF in Sudan 2024,
NATO (strengths)
- Prevented conflict within Europe - since its foundation it has prevented conflict within Europe between the two forces through collective security Article 5
- Effective humanitarian role - NATO has shifted their role since fall of Warsaw Pact.
e.g. NATO enforced UNSC resolution 1973 for a no fly zone in Libya 2011, 2009-2016 Operation Ocean Shield to reduce piracy off Horn of Africa, 2023 Turkey earthquake
- Ideologically and politically close-knit - All nations are pro-capitalist liberal democracies
NATO (weaknesses)
- Expansion into Baltic states has created new instability and conflict with Russia.
e.g. April 2023 Finland joining NATO, Putin justification to the Russian people
- Destabilising failures - Invasion of Afghanistan with NATO troops was a failure and resulted in withdrawal and Taliban rule + Libya verging on a failed state.
- Growing internal division - Disputes over 2% GDP spending rule with Donald Trump complaining, Growing rift with Turkey as they have received weapons from Russia and had problems with expansion
IMF (facts)
Main aims are financial assistance and surveillance of global economy. Requires 85% of voted for resolution to pass. USA has an effective veto 16.52%
IMF (strengths)
- Presents global economic stability - IMF played large role during covid
For example, lent 250bn for stability per quarter, does yearly global stability reports
- IMF has adapted to global changes - This means that it has been effective at guiding global economy.
For example, supporting Nixon 1971, 1990 Fall of Communism, 2010 agreed to increase voting share of Brazil, Russia, India and China
- Low income countries receive 0% loans - this helps foster growth.
For example, in 2023 Benin received $200mn in 0% loans due to weak growth, $100mn to Burundi 2024
IMF (weaknesses)
- Overly influenced by West - based in American Capital, USA 16.52%
- Is a reactive body - Reacts to global economic turmoil rather than dealing with issues before
- Neoliberal economics - Loans have neoliberal conditions (cut state services). For example, studies on SAPs have shown rising youth unemployment Greece (2010s)
World Bank (strengths)
- Effectiveness of missions - World Bank utilises anti-poverty funds to help low income countries grow.
For example, World Bank issues $63bn in 2016 in low interest loans. These funds worked to increase female employment in the Arab League, OED analysed that 72% of WB projects were satisfactory in 2024
- Includes local communities - This has increased efficacy and decreased likelihood of harming existing industry.
2024 $1bn for Mexican business, 2024 mission for pastoralism Burkina Faso
- Global outreach - World Bank 189 members, 12000 projects