Chapter 12 Feminism Flashcards
Core ideas and principles - Sex and Gender
Sex - refers to the biological differences between men and women. Two main debates concerning sex within feminism is difference feminists vs equality feminists
Difference feminism vs equality feminism - DF argue that biological differences between women and men are important and they believe in essentialism (the fundamental differences in nature are natural not constructed). However, EF argue that a women’s nature is socially constructed.
Gender - used to explain the roles of men and women. Feminists argue that gender roles are socially constructed and form gender stereotypes. Simone de Beauvoir argued that the biological differences between men and women had been used by a male dominated society. Men had characterised themselves as the norm whilst women were the others (otherness). ‘One is not born but rather becomes a women’.
Equality feminists argue that human nature is androgynous and that feminism should aspire to genderless personhood. CPG believes that subordination is constructed from a young age. Kate Millet and bell hooks argues that it begins within the family unit.
Key Thinker Simone de Beauvoir
- Argued that femininity was a societal construct
- More of a humanist ‘the fact that we are human beings is infinitely more important
- Otherness is imposed by men. Second Sex 1949
First Wave Feminism
First wave feminism extended classical liberalism’s ideas about human nature and freedom of the individual to explicitly include women. It was an argument for the rationality and formal equality of women.
Charlotte Perkins Gilman argued that women should have equal opportunities in the workplace and introduced the idea of economic independence.
Second Wave Feminism
Kate Millet’s Sexual Politics 1970. Shelia Rowbotham’s Woman’s Consciousness, Man’s World 1973
Second Wave Feminism shared the understanding that women were being oppressed by what became known as the patriarchy.
However, second wave feminism had divergent solutions for this problem.
- Liberal Feminists - influenced by first wave argued for the state to reform society and economy
- Radical feminists - influenced by Millet saw the state as part of the problem and wanted radical changes to the public and private spheres of society.
- Socialist feminists - influenced by Rowbotham argued that only under a socialist feminist revolution could the inequalities of capitalism and female oppression be solved.
Core ideas and principles - patriarchy
Kate Millet argues it means the rule of men in both the private and public spheres.
- Liberal feminists argue that discrimination rather than patriarchy within society and economy can be reformed by the state. These reforms include emancipation, access to education, legislation of abortion
- Radical feminists focus on patriarchy in both the public and private spheres and believe that patriarchy is too pervasive to be reformed. Instead, there must be a revolutionary change, but revolutionary feminists have different suggestions for what that change might be.
- Socialist feminists believe that female consciousness is created by men as part of the capitalist machine. Shelia Rowbotham concluded that women have always been oppressed and that a revolution was needed to destroy both capitalism and patriarchy.
Third Wave and Fourth-wave feminism
- Expanded on the works of Millet and identified six overlapping patriarchal - the state, household, violence, paid work, sexuality, culture
- bell hooks argued that feminist discussions have primarily been from a white middle-class perspective and that women of different ethnicities and socio-economic classes were neglected by mainstream feminism.
To what extent do feminists agree over the concept of patriarchy? agree
- Gilman and de Beauvoir were among the first to identify gender stereotyping. Feminists then argued discrimination as a cultural not biological concept.
- There is agreement among equality feminists that patriarchy is not a static concept
- The majority of equality feminists agree that patriarchy must be opposed in the public sphere of society.
To what extent do feminists agree over the concept of patriarchy? disagree
- Liberal feminists tend to discuss discrimination rather than patriarchy and focus on the public sphere of society.
Radical feminists argue that it must be challenged in both the public and private spheres
- Liberal feminists believe state, society, and economy can be reformed of discriminatory tendencies, while radical feminists often argue that there must be revolutionary change in both the public and private spheres of society.
- Post-modern feminists argue that the patriarchy is more complicated than radicals or socialists argue because of intersectionality
Core ideas and principles - personal is political
Liberal feminists focus on the public sphere of society arguing that the private life of women is the outside the remit of political analysis.
Radical feminists refute this arguing that the ‘personal is political’. Gilman berated the misery of women’s private lives, and argued that conditioning was taking place from birth.
Rowbotham argued that marriage was like feudalism, with women akin to serfs. De Beauvoir championed contraception to allow women control over their bodies. Millet believed family was a social construct.
- Patriarchy granted men ownership over their wife and children, entrenching the idea of male superiority.
- The family socialised the young into recognising masculine authority.
Key Thinker Kate Millet
- Kate Millet was an American academic an her most famous work, Sexual Politics 1970 is regarded as the first systemic analysis of the patriarchy. Personal is political.
- Millet saw the family unit as the foundation of patriarchal thought, as children were socialised into gender roles that they grew up perceiving as normal. Marriage also saw women lose their identity
- Patriarchy reinforced heterosexualism as superior
- Women’s gender roles were stereotyped in art and literature.
Core ideas and principles - equality feminism and difference feminism
Equality feminism - believe biological differences are inconsequential and that gender differences are socially constructed. De Beauvoir dismissed the idea of innate female characteristics.
Difference feminism - biological differences are consequential
Difference feminism can be traced back to first-wave feminists who, while believing that women were men’s intellectual equals, also believed in gender-specific characteristics. Gilman is the only one of the key thinkers who believed in innate female qualities, while also believing in the societal conditioning of women of gender roles.
Core ideas and principles - intersectionality
bell hooks criticised second-wave feminists for conceptualising feminism from a white middle-class perspective.
Key Thinker bell hooks
- women of colour: hooks broadened the feminist debate as she felt it was too focused on middle- and upperclass, college-educated white women. She focused on women of colour and all social classes.
- Intersectionality: hooks’ ideas greatly influenced the idea of intersectionality - challenged the idea that gender was the most important factor in determining a woman’s life experiences
Different types of feminism - liberal feminism
argues that reform can come through democracy
influenced by liberal values of individualism, foundational equality, and equality of opportunity.
Concepts of otherness can be fixed through campaigning too end discrimination in workplace and end outdate cultural attitudes.
Different types of feminism - socialist feminism
Socialist feminists argue that economics leads to gender inequality and that capitalism causes patriarchy.
- Reformist socialist feminists - Gilman thought of herself as a humanist. Gilman believed that capitalism’s exploitative qualities reinforced patriarchy and that socialism would gradually succeed, allowing women and men to coexist in egalitarian.
- Revolutionary socialist feminism - Rowbotham working-class women found employment in factories were they were paid less than men and then had a role in the home.
Rowbotham argues that men do not understand the nature of their oppression and she advocates for a revolution within a revolution.