Genitourinary Flashcards

1
Q

Discuss the epidemiology for bladder/ureter cancer.

A

Incidence (Australian statistics)
- 3200 cases annually (2.1% of all new cancers)
- 11th most common malignancy, 4th most common in men

Marked male predominance (3:1)
Disease of the elderly -mean 70yo
Generally higher income nations & urban dwellers
5 year OS 50-60%

Trigone is most common site

75% of bladder cancers present as superficial disease
* 70% non-invasive papillary (Ta)
* 10% flat in-situ (Tis)
20% T1 invasive

* Previously TCC 
	○ Can involve urothelium from renal pelvis to urethra
	○ Preinvasive/superficial disease  > muscle invasive 
	○ Needs muscle in specimen to be certain of preinvasive/superficial disease 
	○ Can be further classified as non invasive vs invasive
* General macro:
	○ Most common sites: trigone (below VUJ), lateral and posterior wall, + bladder neck 
	○ Frequently multifocal dt field change and tumour seeding 
	○ Typically large infiltrative masses
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Describe the risk factors for bladder/ureter cancer

A

Very rarely genetic, usually associated with exposure to carcinogens

1) cigarette smoking
* most important influence (3-5 fold increase in risk) (including SCC)
* 50-80% of bladder cancers are associated
* Critical with management od discuss smoking cessation with patient
* ?alcohol
2) industrial aryl amine (clothing dyes) & other industrial agents (e.g. paints, solvents), heavy metals
* 15+ year latency
4) cyclophosphamide exposure (TCC+SCC)
5) pelvic irradiation
6) reduced water intake
* Increasing intake may dilute carcinogens in urine –> reduce exposure
7) Chronic inflammation
* Chronic UTIs
* Chronic /long term IDC
* Bladder calculi
* Neurogenic bladder
8) Nephrolithiasis, anatomic anomalies eg. Horseshoe, duplicated renal pelvis (renal pelvis/upper tract SCC)
9) Bladder anatomical anomalies eg. diverticulum

Due to common risk factors, previous upper urinary tract carcinoma (ureter/renal pelvis) predicts for bladder cancer

Genetic
Slow acetylator – leads to impaired metabolism of amines
Lynch syndrome (esp MSH2) may be associated with increased risk (10%)

SCC RF: CHronic inflammation

schistosomiasis
	○ Endemic in North Africa (esp Egypt)
	○ Pathogenesis = parasitic worm--> organisms lay ova in epithelium --> chronic inflammation and metaplasia --> increased risk of bladder SCC (rather than TCC)
* Chronic IDC –paraplegia, MVA. 
* Bladder stone, recurrent UTI
* Cyclophosphamide
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

List the layers of the bladder.

A

i) Urothelium/epithelium– as above
ii) Lamina propria– separated from urothelium by thin basement membrane. Abundant connective tissue, loose stroma, blood vessels, thin bands of muscularis mucosa
iii) Muscularis propria (detrusor muscle)- surrounds lamina propria, thick irregularly arranged bands of detruser muscle. Smoothelin is a marker of terminally differentiated smooth muscle cells, specific for muscularis propria compared to muscularis mucosa so can be helpful in determining muscle invasion
Anchored to the abdominal wall by the urachus (embryological remnant)
iv) Serosa/Perivesical Fat – M propria is separated from perivesical fat by serosal layer.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Describe the pathogenesis for bladder cancer

A

1) papillary neoplasm
○ Chronic inflammation –cytokines, interleukin.
○ Gain of function mutations in FGFR3 and RAS pathways –> development of papillary NMIBC
○ Gain of further mutations which lead to muscle invasion (e.g. p53, RB)
▪ TERT, PI3K, other genetic instability
▪ Only 20% of lesions will progress to MIBC
2) carcinoma in-situ
○ Mutations in p53 +/- RB –> development of flat carcinoma in-situ within epithelium
▪ P53/RB mutations occur early in CIS
○ Gain of further mutations which lead to muscle invasion
▪ PTEN
▪ Much higher incidence of progression to MIBC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Discuss the theories for multifocality

A

The presence of a bladder or upper renal tract cancer strongly predicts for future disease

1) Field cancerisation

Due to equal carcinogenic distribution, all areas are likely to have mutational damage
	○ Therefore, high risk of further disease occurring elsewhere in bladder (50% recurrence after TURBT)
	○ This also extends to risk of ureter/urothelial involvement

Extensive disease involvement (or multiple recurrence) should indicate cystectomy as the preferred approach

2) Monoclonal seeding

Malignant cells spread via intraluminal lymphatics and re-implant
	○ A seemingly new tumour deposit takes shape
Clinical evidence
	○ If you have upper tract disease, you have 40% risk of bladder but 5% of contralateral upper tract
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Describe the different types of non-invasive bladder histology

A

WHO classification
○ 2004/2022 update
○ G1/2/3 > PUNLMP > LG >HG
○ Aggressive subtypes: Micropapillary, nested, large nested

* Papilloma (1% of all bladder tumours)
	○ Small and single causes haematuria
	○ Benign
	○ Exophytic papilloma = malignant progression rare (but possible)
	○ Exophytic lesions w papillary fronds lined by urothelium lacking atypia.
	○ Inverted papilloma = benign
* Papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential (PUNLMP)
	○ Papillae lined by thickened urothelium with ↑cell density. Mitoses rare.
	○ Recurrence is reasonably frequent
	○ Progression to malignancy is rare
* Low-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma (non-invasive - Ta)
	○ Slightly abnormal architecture in urothelium and low-grade atypia
	○ Tendency to recur locally, but infrequently (10%) invade muscle
	○ Rarely result in death as a result 
* High-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma (non-invasive - Ta)
	○ Dyscohesive cells with irregular nuclei; frequent mitoses; disordered architecture
	○ Markedly higher risk of progression to MIBC 65%. 10 year survival 40%
	○ High risk of nodal and distant metastasis
* Carcinoma in-situ
	○ High grade lesion w cytologically malignant cells within a flat urothelium that have not invaded lamina propria.
	○ Often asymptomatic, but may present with dysuria, urgency, haematuria.
	○ MACRO – Irregularly hyperaemic mucosa. Commonly multifocal + may involve most of bladder surface, extending into ureters + urethra.
	○ MICRO – severe cytologic atypia w nuclear anaplasia, loss of polarity, crowding, pleomorphism. Umbrella cell urothelium retained
	○ If untreated >50% chance of progression to invasive malignancy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Describe the pathology for invasive urothelial carcinoma

A
  • Invasive urothelial carcinoma (90%)
    ○ Classified by Papillary or flat, and high or low grade.
    ○ Depth of invasion is prognostic (and defines T-stage)
    ○ 80% of high grade lesions invade muscle
    ○ Ta, Tis and T1 are nonmuscle invasive.
    ○ Macroscopic Appearance
    * Trigone, field changes, multifocality.
    * Ranges from subtle bladder wall thickening, to obvious exophytic/ulcerated mass, esp trigone
      Microscopic Appearance
    	
          * Cytologic appearance
              ○ Standard irregularities (high nuclear/cytoplasm ratio, irregular chromatin, hyperchromatic nuclei, bizarre mitoses)
              ○ Degree of changes indicates grade
          * Histology
              ○ Flat or Papillary: urothelium around fibrovascular cores
              ○ Neoplastic cells typically arranged in nests/sheets/cords
                  ® Invading past Lamina propria
              ○ Can have single irregular cells within otherwise normal appearing structure
              ○ High grade hyperchromatic nuclei, enlarged, mitosis, necrosis mmunohistochemistry
              ○ POS = GATA3, CK7, CK20, p40, p63, HMWCK NEG = PSA & NKX3.1 & AMACR (prostate), PAX 8 (RCC)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

List the rare subtypes of bladder TCC.

A
  • Rare subtypes
    ○ Lymphoepithelial-like carcinoma
    ○ Microcystic carcinoma
    ○ Plasmacytoid carcinoma (impart poor prognosis) –> loss of E-cadherin (discohesive)
    ○ Micropapillary carcinoma (impart poor prognosis)
    ○ Sarcomatoid carcinoma (impart poor prognosis)

PMS is bad

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Besides TCC what are other primary bladder tumour?

A
  • Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC)
    ○ Epidemiology
    § Uncommon - 3-5% of bladder cancers
    § Incidence varies by geographic region, with higher prevalence (30%) in Egypt and Africa due to schistosomiasis
    · Incidence is falling due to declining rates of schistosoma infection
    § Slight male predominance
    ○ Risk factors
    § Chronic inflammation
    · Chronic catheter
    · Neurogenic bladder
    · Bladder stones
    · Schistosomiasis
    § Smoking – x5 increased risk
    ○ Histopathology
    § Macro: Usually large exophytic tumours, some cases flat and ulcerating. Tan/white colour. Often necrotic with flaky keratin on surface
    § Micro: Irregular infiltrating nests or sheets of malignant cells with destructive stroma invasion. Keratin pearls/ intercellular bridges, often associated with SCC insitu.
    § If any focus of urothelial carcinoma is present, then tumour is defined as urothelial carcinoma with squamous differentiation
    • Adenocarcinoma
      ○ Rare
      ○ Associated with remnant urachus or in association with extensive intestinal metaplasia
      ○ More often secondary vs. primary (rectum, prostate, endometrium)
    • Small Cell Carcinoma
      ○ Rare
      ○ Aggressive natural history, associated with p53 or Rb mutations
    • Rhabdomyosarcoma
      ○ Exceedingly rare –> childhood cancer predominantly
      Typically present with large masses protruding into lumen
    • Benign lesions:
      § Cystitis, metaplasia
      ® Infectious, iatrogenic, idiopathic
      ® Can form polyploid features
      ® Generally not premalignant
      § Malakoplakia: distinctive chronic inflammatory reaction
      § Nephrogenic adenoma: implantation of renal tubular cells into inflammaed urothelium
      § Urothelial papilloma: uncommon
      Can invert and ivaginate into the lamina (no invasion)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Describe the patterns of spread for bladder cancer.

A

Patterns of Spread
a) Local
* Often multifocal, can recur in previously uninvolved quadrants. May involve most of the bladder surface, ureters and urethra.
Multifocality due to 2 main reasons:
i) Tumour cells have ability of autotransplantation, hence multifocality.
ii) Field cancerisation, so recurrences are new tumours rather than true recurrences.
* Muscle invasion usually signifies high grade tumour + assoc w worse prognosis: 50% survival at 5yrs.
* Direct spread to pelvic side wall, vagina/uterus, rectum, prostate.
b) Lymphatic
* Drainage to perivesical LNs (1st ech)→ int + common iliacs. Some to ext iliacs.
* Macroscopically +ve LN generally v poor prognosis; precludes definitive treatment.
* However, some series evidence from radical cystectomy pts w pelvic LND, that 25% of pts w involved LN survive 10yrs. Also, pts who have a PLND have better survival than those that don’t, + pts w 10+ LNs dissected have better survival than <10 LNs (Case series)
* Note: TROG protocol- if ↑LNs on CT, then only eligible if LNs -ve on biopsy.
c) Haematogenous: Bone, lung + liver.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Discuss the recurrence risk factors and risk characterisation for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.

A

Risk of Recurrence (superficial bladder cancer)
* 40-80% NMIBC recur within 6-12 months without additional therapy
* 10-15% will progress to MIBC, regional or met
* General:
○ Stage
○ Grade
○ Multifocality
○ Frequency of recurrence
○ Size
○ Presence of CIS
○ Variant histo
○ LVI

* Low-risk  = all of:
	○ solitary, primary (non-recurrent), low-grade Ta papillary carcinoma, <3cm
	○ no CIS
* Intermediate-risk 
	○ Not meeting either criteria = 
		○ Low grade papillary with some of multiple lesions, recurrent disease, >3cm
* High-risk = any of:
	○ CIS
	○ High-grade Ta papillary carcinoma
	○ T1 disease
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Describe the prognostic factors for muscle invasive bladder cancer

A

Patient
* Age and performance status
* Co-morbidity (notably, renal function)
* Anaemia
* Smoking (impaired tumour control and worse toxicity)
* Ability to have surgery

Tumour
* T-stage is the most significant
○ T1 to T2 distinction most important
○ T2 50% survival at 5 years (75% T1, 20% T3)
○ Size is also relevant for outcome with CMT
* N-stage also important
○ N+ disease is considered metastatic
○ Risk of nodal increases w/ T stage (T1 – 5%; T2-3a – 30%; T3b – 50%; T4 – 60%)
* Histological grade, LVI
* Hydronephrosis
* Recurrent disease
* Various histopathological variants impart different prognosis
* Associated CIS - risk of MIBC 30% at 5 years

Treatment
* Concurrent chemotherapy (ideally cisplatin-based)
* Extent of TURBT (completeness of resection)
* Residual disease after TURBT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What factors should be considered when deciding on bladder preservation therapy.

A
  • “Bladder Worth Preserving”
    ○ Continent
    ○ Good bladder capacity
    • Unifocal T2-3a disease only
      ○ In addition, lesions >5cm have worse prognosis
    • Maximal TURBT associated with improved outcome
    • Absence of tumour associated hydronephrosis
      Absence of extensive CIS (field cancerisation)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Describe the history and examination for a patient with bladder cancer.

A
  • History
    ○ HPI
    § Haematuria (painless in 80%) - micro or gross (usually gross)
    □ Initial suggest urethral
    □ Terminal suggests bladder neck or prostate
    □ Continuous suggests bladder
    § Microscopic haematuria
    □ –urologist/cystoscopy if age >40-50, smoker or gross haematuria
    § Bladder function
    □ Irritative bladder symptoms: dysuria, frequency, urgency (especially in the absence of a UTI)
    ® Especially CIS
    § Suprapubic pain (direct tumour invastion/obstruction)
    § Pelvic pain
    □ Obturator, hypogastric, rectal, presacral invasion or urogenital diaphgragm
    § Obstructive symptoms
    □ Flank pain
    □ LUTS if prostate/bladder neck (less common)
    ○ PMHx
    § Previous ureteric/bladder diagnosis (e.g. chronic cystitis)
    § Pelvic radiotherapy
    § Chemotherapy (esp cyclophosphamide)
    § Chronic UTIs–> chronic irritation of the bladder
    ○ Family History
    § Lynch syndrome
    ○ Social
    § Ethnic background (Africa/Egypt areas in which chronic infection with schistosoma has an association with chronic inflammation and SCC)
    § Smoking history (Most dominant risk factor- Increase RR x5)
    § Occupational exposures
    □ Hair dyes
    □ Paint
    □ Petroleum
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Describe the staging for bladder cancer.

A

○ NMIBC (70%): Superficial low-grade tumors (Ta, T1).
○ Of those, 70% are confined to mucosa (Tis/Ta). 30% are confined to submucosa (T1).
○ 15-20% develop MIBC after diagnosis.
○ MIBC (25%): Invasion of the detrusor muscle. Around 50% will develop metastases, even with local therapy.
○ 4% with mets at diagnosis.

Risk of nodal involvement
○ Overall 24% LN+.
○ Lymph nodes for T0-1 / 2 / 3a / 3b-4
○ of 5→ 18→ 26→ 50%

TNM Staging (8th edition)

Ta-T1 = superficial
>=T2 = MIBC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Describe the work up for bladder cancer.

A

Work-Up

- Urine cytology (12-60% sensitive; high specificity) (not if catheter)
	○ If high-index of suspicion, proceed to cystoscopy
	○ If cystoscopy negative, urine cytology to exclude upper tract malignancy

- Bloods (pre-surgical/pre-chemotherapy)
	○ FBC, EUC, CMP, LFT
	
- Urine MCS - exclude UTI, exclude haematuria mimics by seeing RBC
	○ Prior to cystoscopy 
	○ Prior to intravesical therapies

- Imaging:
	○ Renal tract USS often in initial workup
		§ Can miss small tumours, especially if less than 10mm
		§ False positives with inflammation or underfilling 
	○ CT CAP –good for bladder masses. Only 70% sensitive for nodes.
		§ Used for initial imaging where possible 
	○ CT IVP for renal pelvis and ureter lesion - exclude synchronous
		§ Prioritises the excretory phase and contrast is timed to best image the kidney and ureters 
		§ At least 3 phases with delayed excretory phase (IVP)
			□ 87% sensitivity, 99% specificity
		§ Good for upper tract abnormalities and potential met disease
		§ Not good for muscle invasion
		§ Contrast timing is less intentional for imaging the urinary tract
	○ Bone scan
	○ MRI to assess tumour extent 
		§ Not rebated 
		§ Suitable for contrast allergy
		§ Distinguish T1 from T2; also better for T3
		§ Needs to be done before TURBT
	○ FDG-PET (rare cancer MBS item)
		§ Changes management in 10%
	
- EUA + Cystoscopy
	○ EUA first - assess for fixation, if so - not resectable 
	○ Biopsy (aim TURBT) 4 quadrants + urethra
		§ Urethra involvment = contraidindication for intravesical therapy.
		§ Usually piecemeal, en bloc resection better - limited by size (needs to be able to come out with c'scope)
		§ Cold cup biopsy -no diathermy, then diathermy after to stop bleeding
		§ Resectascope -loop resection with plasma arc -cuts/coagulates
			□ Need 3 way catheter after to stop clot -dilutes with saline
		§ Generally will put in stent at time of TURBT
	○ 
		§ Risks -
			□ Anaesthetic, bleeding, clots, UTI, pain
			□ Damage to bladder, Ureter (obstruction from ureter)
			□ Incomplete resection
			□ Seeding of infection

	○ Bilateral Ureter cytology
	○ Fluorescence: instilled 1 hour before. More sensitive for tumour
		§ Improves recurrence free survival 
		§ Good for CIS
	○ Need muscle present in biopsy specimen
	○ Important to assess for CIS:
		o If present, increased risk of MIBC 
		o Assoc with aggressive disease 
		o Less likely to have durable response to BCG
	○ Important to assess for hydronephrosis:
		o Associated with MIBC in 90% cases 
		o Assoc with 70% extravesical spread 
		o Less likely to achieve CR
	
- FU after TURBT should biopsy TURBT site.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Describe the general initial management for bladder cancer.

A
  • Patients should all have a cystoscopy with maximal TURBT (including non-MIBC)
    ○ TURBT full thickness biopsy to full depth of detrusor muscle
    § Resect all visible disease to muscle and margin
    § After first resection -scarring thickens bladder make second resection safer
    ○ Allows best T-staging
    § Approx 30% of apparent T1 tumours understated by TURBT
    □ Repeat 4-6 weeks to assess recurrence for all >=T1 and high grade Ta, even if initial resection thought to be complete
    ○ Cyto-reduction is important before trimodality therapy
    • Hydronephrosis management options:
      § Patients with VUJ obstruction should have stenting performed prior to treatment commencement
      ○ Stenting
      § Plastic, silicone, reinforced. Can be solid
      □ Works by urine tracking along outside of stent (hard stent vs soft tissue), unless cancer surrounds stent and hardens.
      ® Reinforced stents are harder (cancer takes longer to het as hard)
      □ Changed between 3-12months -get brittle and encrusted (stones)
      ® Inability to remove
      § Stent colic pain ?from distention or muscle spasm
      ® Treat with alpha blockers/cholinergics/NSAID to relax muscle
      ® Hurts when urinate -urine refluxes up ureter
      § Stent bleeding -expected from stent
      □ Rubs/irritates urothelium in renal pelvis/bladder
      □ Esp clopidogrel causing clot retention
      § Does not seed tumour
      ○ Perc nephrostomy (bridge to treatment, not good palliation as frequent admission)
      ○ Reimplantation nephrectomy (doesn’t work post RT)
      ○ Observation
    • Consider maintenance of Hb > 100g/L (if concurrent chemoRT)
    • Recommend smoking cessation (increases risk of progression and recurrence)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Discuss management options for muscle invasive bladder cancer.

A
  • Radical cystectomy remains the gold-standard therapy (traditionally the cornerstone of curative treatment removal of bladder, prostate, seminal vesicles, pelvic lymph node dissection and reconstruction of the urinary tract)
    ○ No randomised trial to suggest otherwise
    ○ Radical cystectomy is associated with significant perioperative mortality and morbidity risk
    ○ Open or laparoscopic
    • Trimodality therapy is a reasonable alternative (bladder preservation approach with maximal TURBT followed by chemoRT)
      ○ Comparative cure rates are similar (in carefully selected cohorts)
      § No direct RCTs comparing RC vs. BCT
      § TMT tends to be reserved for pt not fit for surgery
      ○ 5 yr OS 50%, bladder preservation rate 70%
      § Main modality of failure is distant (up to 80%)
      § ~67% cCR after induction
      ○ Toxicity and QoL implications are generally better
      § More tolerable for elderly or medically co-morbid patientsD
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Discuss cystectomy for bladder cancer.

A

Cystectomy

- Remains the standard of care for patients fit for extensive surgery for MIBC (cT2-T4a) with:
- Neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy is also the standard of care
	○ Neoadjuvant preferred as pt frail postop.
	○ Metanalysis: 5% improved overall survival
	○ 3x MVAC protocol (MTX, vinblastine, doxorubicin, cisplatin)
		§ ECOG 0-1, Cr clearance >60, good hearing/peripheral nerves, no heart failure
		§ Given dose dense 2 weekly with growth factor support
	○ Alternative Cisplatin+gemcitabine (v slightly worse outcome but better tolerated)
- Neoadjuvant immuno -ongoing RCT trial

Cystectomy:
- Preferred: (also see candidates for tri-modality)
○ Widespread CIS
○ Multifocality
○ Residual/recurrent disease following TUBRT
○ Poor baseline function
○ Relative contraindications to chemo/radiotherapy
○ Variant pathology
○ Location
○ Ureter involvement
○ Acceptability of stoma
- Also excellent local palliation
- Vs partial cystectomy
○ Want radical cystectomy but unfit, or for organ preservation
○ Partial cystectomy probably good enough control of solitary MIBC, not near trigone (eg. Near urachus)

- The procedure entails:
	○ As soon after recovery from NAC as possible 
	○ Open or minimally invasive
	○ Resection of bladder and adjacent organs en-bloc
		§ Prostatectomy/SV/vas/proximal urethra
		§ If required: Hysterectomy + 1/3 vagina +- BSO
	○ Bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy if M0
		§ At minimum EI, II, obturators
		§ More nodes = better outcomes, at least 10
	○ Formation of:
		§ 90% Abdominal stoma (continent or incontinent)
			□ Ileal conduit 15cm
		§ Or Neobladder (sbowel connected to urethra) 50cm of ileum -
			□   For young nonsmokers, Not for multifocal disease
			□ 30% work well, 60% poor quality of life -incontinence, self IDC, mucus washout, frequency
	○ 30% of patients experience complications within 3 months of surgery 
		§ Sexual dysfunction
		§ Nocturnal incontinence 
		§ Urinary retention 
		§ Serious complications in 3-5% (urethro-enteric anastomotic stricture, intestinal obstruction)
			□ Ileus, dehiscence, infection, lymph leak, urine leak. 2-3 weeks in hospital
		§ Perioperative mortality is 2-5%, 1-2% for well selected younger patients 
	○ Late
			□ Recurrent urosepsis
			□ Hernia, ueteroileal stricture, stoma issues,
			□ SBO
			□ Lymphocele
			□ 35% develop CKD3 
		
- Open vs. Minimally invasive/ Robotic 
	○ Less invasive, less blood loss, faster recovery 
	○ Most benefitial in frail, elderly, obese
	○ Reduction in ureter/hernia complications 
	○ Can have sexual function preserved 
	○ Good QoL

Role of bladder preservation chemo/radiotherapy
- Selection
- Tumour: T2/3a, <5cm, CIS, unifocal
- Patient: nil hydro (understaging) good bladder and renal function , ECOG
- Treatment max TURBT
- Outcomes
○ 5yr OF 50%, bladder preservation 66%
○ 30% G3/4 acute tox, 5% late tox
Recurrence after CR: 30% CIS, 15% invasive, 15% N=

Partial cystectomy = indications
- Major: indications for radical, but unfit for radical cystectomy on physiologiocal grounds
- Minor/weak: localised solitary, urachal, partial preference, location - technically easier if distant from UO/bladder neck, diverticulum tumour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Discuss adjuvant management after cystectomy for bladder cancer.

A
  • Consider adjuvant chemo if NAC was not given in pT3+ or N+ (generally pts not fit, poor renal function)
    ○ EORTC 30994
    ○ 5yr PFS benefit (48 >32%) without improvement in OS (54 >48%)
    ○ Chemo included Gemcitabine/Cisplatin, MVAC, or ddMVAC (methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin)
    • Adjuvant Radiotherapy (limited use)
      ○ Consider adjuvant chemo or PORT for pT3-pT4a, SM+, ECE, or < 10 LN removed.
      ○ pT3-4, SM+ or ECE: Pelvic nodes to 45-50.4 Gy and cystectomy bed (if SM+) to 54-60 Gy.
      ○ LR after RC: 45-50 Gy to pelvic nodes, 60-65 Gy to gross LR with CDDP.
    • Adjuvant Nivolumab -not on PBS
      ○ Persistent muscle invasive after neoadjuvant chemo, or high risk features or no chemo
      RCT CHECKMATE: HR 0.7 (15% absolute) Improved DFS, especially >1% PDL.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Describe tri-modality therapy for bladder cancer.

A
  • Comprised of
    ○ Maximal TURBT in any bladder preservation case
    § Pool RTOG analysis suggested cCR in 50% for incomplete TUBRT vs 70%
    ○ Definitive radiotherapy (64Gy/32F or 55Gy/20F)
    § Split course (two phases, UTD/EviQ)
    □ 50Gy/25Fx, assessment with cystoscopy, then Further 14Gy/7Fx to primary
    □ No trials comparing the two approaches, institutional dependent
    ○ Concurrent chemotherapy (Cisplatin or MMC + 5-FU or low dose gemcitabine
    § RCT: Improved locoregional control, reduced salvage cystectomy
    § Cisplatin 100 mg/m2 q3w, or Cisplatin 35mg/m2 q1w
    § Cisplatin doublet:
    □ CDDP 15 d1-3,8-10,15-17 + Paclitaxel 50 d1,8,15.
    □ CDDP 15 d1-3,8-10,15-17 + 5-FU 400 d1-3,8-10,15-17
    § MMC (12mg/m2 d1) + 5-FU (500mg/m2/d d1-5, d16-20). (week 1 and 4)
    § Concurrent low dose gemcitabine is also an option (twice weekly)
    • Selection for patients appropriate (EUA/AUA/EviQ/FROGG/NCCN)
      ○ Good bladder function and capacity (a bladder worth salvaging)
      ○ cT2-T3a urothelial carcinoma
      ○ No CIS
      ○ Unifocal disease
      ○ Non variant histology
      ○ Preferably <3cm, not more than >6cm
      ○ Maximal TURBT achieved/essential
      ○ No hydronephrosis or ureteral obstruction (increased risk of incomplete response and LR)
      ○ Compliance/reliable with surveillance
      ○ FROGG prefers if
      § Increased perioperative mortality/morbidity
      § Patient preference to conserve bladder
    • There is no clearly proven benefit to adjuvant chemotherapy following TMT
      If metastatic nodal disease, will require chemotherapy
22
Q

Describe elective nodal irradiation in bladder cancer and also management of node positive disease.

A
  • Elective nodal irradiation is controversial/optional in node negative patients
    ○ Common in USA, not done in UK/AUS
    ○ Data
    § BC2001 & TROG trials have shown nodal recurrence of <10%
    ○ Rationale for avoiding
    § Chemotherapy will address some risk
    § Marked increase in toxicity
    § No evidence supporting its use
    ○ FROGG management recommendations (Table 10, FROGG 2020 guideline)
    § Node positivity = poor prognostic factor, 5yr OS 29%
    § If confined to pelvis BCT may be offered as a treatment option
    § Involved nodes - treat to prescribed dose given to GTV, respecting OARs
    § cN0 - ENI increases toxicity, no evidence improves outcomes (as above)

Node positive bladder cancer -series data only
Neoadjuvant chemo, cystectomy and dissection
CRT
Chemo alone, clinical trial

ASTRO 2022 conference: retrospective analysis
	CRT 2.4 years median survival, cystectomy 2.1 years

Consider -metastasis risk (high if >3 nodes involved),  location/number size of nodes (RT toxicity re bowel proximity)
23
Q

Describe palliative management of muscle invasive bladder cancer.

A
  • Radiotherapy alone
    ○ ~30-50% 5 year LC, underestimated as pt w/ DM less likely to undergo bladder surveillance
    ○ Up to 50% of MIBC may harbour occult DM
    ○ Consider 36/6 as palliative approach if pt not good candidates for CCRT, 21Gy/3#, 8Gy/1#, 50Gy/20#, 35Gy/10#
    § 90% improvement in haematuria, 80% frequency, dysuria 70Gy, nocturia 64Gy
    § 21Gy/3# if prognosis 6 months or very elderly.
    ○ Decide based on burden of distant metastasis
    Salvage surgery -cystectomy: bleeding, pain, obstruction
    Ablating all urothelium helps with pain.
24
Q

Describe management of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.

A

Non-MIBC (Ta, Tis, T1) - 75% of all bladder Ca

- All should have cystoscopy with a TURBT in the first instance
- Further therapy is based on the pathology and risk grouping - risk calculator  Essentially add adjuvant intravesical BCG unless low grade papillary (single chemo)

Radiotherapy +/- chemotherapy
- Can be used in NMIBC, generally multiple TURBT but poor bladder function so limited role of RT
○ Concern re understaged NMIBC

- Retrospective study (Weiss, J Clin Onc 2006); 141 pt T1, 60% HG, (RT=28, RT+ chemo=113)
	○ cCR 88%
	○ Rates of tumour progression 5 yr 19%, 10yr 30%
	○ CSS 5yr 82%, 10yr 73%
	○ 80% bladder preservation 

NMIBC Pembrolizumab post TURBT (not on PBS)

25
Q

Describe intravesical therapy for Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.

A
  • Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG)
    ○ Standard for high-grade T1, Tis, or T1 tumours after TUBRT
    ○ Live attenuated mycobacterium bovis,
    § local immune response
    § Induction of mononuclear cell infiltrate, predominantly CD4 T cells and macrophages
    § Increased expression IFNg > inc expression of MHC class II
    § Elevated urinary cytokine levels
    § Direct suppression of tumour growth in dose-dependent manner
    ○ Toxicity: polyuria, cystitis, fever, haematuria; can be severe
    ○ Course used in all high risk disease
    § Also for select intermediate risk
    § MA: consistently decreases the risk of recurrence and progression c/w chemotherapy when at least 1 year administered
    • Single shot chemo, not shown to be superior ; CHEMO RARELY USED IN AUSRTALIA (chemo precautions, perforation)
    • Mitomycin
      ○ Usually given as a single administration following resection of low risk NMIBC
      ○ MA (2007): reduces recurrence by 17%
      § Better if given within 24 hours vs. 2 weeks
      ○ 6x weekly courses if low grade and recurrent
    • Gemcitabine
      ○ Similar to MMC, better toxicity profile
26
Q

Discuss indications for cystectomy in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.

A
  • Cystectomy should be considered if:
    ○ Extensive multifocal disease (TURBT not feasible)
    ○ Multiple recurrences/ residual disease despite multiple repeat TURBTs
    ○ T1 + LVI present
    ○ Adverse pathology
    § Pure SCC or adenocarcinoma
    § Micropapillary or sarcomatoid malignancy
    § Small cell (usually after neoadjuvant chemotherapy)
    ○ CIS involving prostatic ducts
    ○ T1 HG + CIS, >3cm, multiple; Better CSS with early RC
    Consider bladder preservation with chemoRT for high grade cT1 (Weiss paper)
27
Q

Describe management of upper urinary tract cancer and metastatic bladder cancer.

A

Upper tract urothelial cancer
Low risk – endoscopic laser ablation
High risk:
Neoadjuvant chemo -small benefit
Nephrouureteroectomy
Gold standard -remove ureter, kidney and cuff of bladder -en block resection
1-2 day admission
IDC for 2 weeks

Metastatic Bladder cancer

First line: chemo
	ddMVAC or 3 weekly MVAC (OS ~1 year)
	Cisplatin gemcitabine -well tolerated
	
	If can't have cisplatin, Carbo instead.
	Single agent chemo no use
	Immuno -not on PBS
	
	New Trial: EV + pembro 1st line improved overall survival (Not PBS in 2023)

Progression or Maintenance immuno (after 4-6 months chemo) 
	Pembrolizumab (on PBS)

3rd line: on PBS
	Enfortumab vedotin -antibody drug chemo
		Nectin 4 antibody (urothelial surface), Chemo attached (MMAE)
		Improved survival vs chemo Se: neuropathy, occular, rashes, hyperglycaemia
28
Q

Discuss the evidence to support trimodality therapy in bladder cancer.

A

Summary:
- Tri-modality therapy is a reasonable treatment option with high rates of local control and survival
- Hypofractionation is a reasonable non-inferior approach with comparable or better outcomes

Zlotta 2023 
	Retrospectibe matched analysis TNT (TURBT+ CRT) vs cystectomy – 1119 patients, T2-3N0
	no difference in 5 year DFS, OS favoured TNT
	30% had salvage cystectomy

Multi-institutional Matched Comparison (Efstathiou, ASTRO 2022, Lancet 2023)
	○ Retrospective 722 pt MIBC cT2-T4aN0M0 treated 2005-2017 in 3 centres
		§ RC 440, TMT 282; all pt solitary, <7cm, no hydro, no extensive CIS
			□ 60% NACT in cystectomy arm
		§ 5y MFS ~75%. 5y DFS ~74%. 5y pelvic nodal-failure free survival ~95%.
		§ 5y CSS ~81→ 84%. 5y OS 66→ 73%. (favours TMT)
		§ Local failure after TMT
			□ 20% NMIBC
			□ 11% MIBC
			□ 13% Salvage cystectomy
		§ Limitations: retrospective, high volume centres ?generalisability, 60% NACT only
	○ Similar dutch study Bruck 2023
		
BC2001 (James, 2012)
	○ 360 patients with MIBC cT2-T4a were randomised to 
		§ Definitive RT (55/20 36%, 64/32 64%) +/- chemotherapy (MMC + 5-FU)
			□ PTV: Outer empty bladder wall + 1.5 cm. Extravesicular disease + 2 cm.
				® Ant anterior and 2 lateral fields used to encompass PTV in 95% isodose.
		§ Despite no extra- perivesicular nodal coverage - rates of pelvic nodal failure <10%
			□ Recall: Only ~25% will have nodes, 70% of which are perivesicular. 1.5 cm margin covers it.
	○ Outcomes
		§ Improved DFS in the chemoRT arm (67% vs 54%; HR 0.68; p=0.03)
			□ 5 year 63% (95% CI 54–71%) in the cRT group versus 49% 
			□ 5 year Locoregional recurrence of 21% vs 36% (HR 0.57)
				® Invasive control 79% vs 64%
				® Noninvasive control 
		§ No improvement in 5 year OS (48% vs 35%; HR 0.82; p=0.16)
			□ No chemo  ~10% less
		§ Reduction in rate of cystectomy at 5 years (14% vs 22%)
			□ Most for disease recurence, 1% had cystectomy for late se
		§ Acute G3-4 36% (21% GU, 10% GI), late G3-4 ~ 8-9% with CCRT.
		§ QOL: chemo no impact 

RTOG Pooled Analysis (Mak, 2014)
	○ 468 patients from 6 phase II or III trials were pooled
		§ All investigating the role of chemoRT
		§ Phase 1 treatment included radiation therapy to approximately 40 Gy, then re-staged patients with cystoscopy before proceeding to either cystectomy (non-complete response) or phase 2 consolidative radiation therapy up to 64 Gy (if complete response).
	○ Outcomes
		§ Clinical CR was achieved in 69%
		§ 5yr OS = 57% whilst 10yr OS = 36%
		§ 5yr CSS = 71% whilst 10yr CSS = 65%
		§ Of patients who survived 5 years, 80% avoided cystectomy (intact bladder preserved)
	○ Failure patterns:
		§ Non-muscle invasive LF 5 /10 yr: 31 >36%
		§ Muscle invasive LF 5/ 10yr : 13 > 14%
		§ Nodal failure 5/10 13>16%
		§ DM 5/10 yr 13 > 35%
		§ Ie. 50% will have LF, 2/3 non-invasive; most within the first 5 years 

		
UK Meta-analysis (Choudhury, 2021)
	○ 782 patients across two trials (BC2001 and BCON trials)
		§ Both trials assessed chemoradiotherapy
		§ BC2001 (n=456): RT ± 5-FU and MMC. 360 pts. Only 36% received 55/20. 
		§ BCON (n=326): RT ± hypoxia modifying therapy. Majority (70%) received 55/20.
		§ Either 64Gy/32F (2Gy/#) or 55Gy/20F (2.75 Gy/#) were allowed as per physician choice
		§ Add 1.5 cm to the bladder and 2 cm to extravesicular disease to PTV for coverage.
	○ Outcomes
		§ Hypofractionation was associated with trend of LR benefit- not significant (HR 0.91)
		§ No difference in OS
		§ Similar toxicity profiles in both arms
			□ with difference in G3-4 late bladder or rectum symptoms of -3.37% (-11.85-5.10).
			□ 5y late bladder/rectal toxicity (G3-4 on LENT-SOMA scale) ~32%. 
		§ Note that there was LC and OS advantage to the use of a radiosensitiser (BCON)
29
Q

Discuss the evidence for cystectomy in bladder cancer.

A

Summary:
- Neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy is the standard of care
- No role for neoadjuvant RT (LC benefit only)

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Meta-analysis (ABCMC, 2003)
	○ 2688 patients from 10 RCTs
		§ Examination of the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to cystectomy
		§ Platinum-based
	○ Outcomes
		§ Neoadjuvant chemotherapy associated with improved 5 year OS (HR 0.81; 5% absolute; p=0.016)
		§ Combination chemotherapy superior to single-agent cisplatin

Neoadjuvant radiotherapy

Retrospective single-institution trial (Cole, 1995)
	○ 570 patients with MIBC were treated with cystectomy
		§ Some had neoadjuvant radiotherapy (~50Gy) and some did not
	○ Outcomes
		§ Improved local control with neoadjuvant radiotherapy (91% vs 72%)
		§ No difference in OS (52% vs 40%; not significant)

Open vs Minimally Invasive

Retrospective review (Raza, 2015)
	○ Retrospective review of 702 patients undergoing robotic cystectomy
	○ Outcomes
		§ 5 year OS = 50%
		§ 5 year CSS = 75%
30
Q

Discuss the evidence to support palliative RT in bladder cancer

A

HYBRID (2009-2014) [Hafeez IJROBP ‘17]: Phase II. 36/6 q1w.
○ 36Gy/6#: standard plan vs plan of the day
○ Hypofractionated RT delivered weekly with a “plan of the day” approach offers good LC and acceptable toxicity.
○ 65 pts. T2-T3a Nx M0-1. Median age 86y. 3D planning. Not suitable for RC or CCRT.
§ Local control 92%.
§ Local progression at 1 / 2y of 7→ 17%.
§ 1y OS 63%.
§ Acute G3 GU 18%. Acute G3 GI 4%. G3 late toxicity ~5%.
○ 2021 update

31
Q

Discuss the side effects for bladder RT.

A

Acute:
-Fatigue
-Irritative or obstructive urinary symptoms - Bladder spasms, dysuria, nocturia, frequency, incontinence, urgency, retention.
-Proctitis - Including diarrhoea, increased bowel frequency, rectal urgency, pain and bleeding.
-Toxicity relating to chemotherapy
-Sexual function - female Vaginitis, vaginal mucositis, dyspareunia/stenosis.
-Sexual function - male Sexual and erectile dysfunction.

Late:
-Fatigue
-Cystitis/urethritis - Includes haematuria.
-Bladder dysfunction - New or ongoing.
-Urinary incontinence
-Radiation induced small bowel obstruction - Rare.
-Proctitis
-Faecal incontinence
-Radiation induced rectourethral fistulas - Rare.
-Lymphoedema
-Sexual dysfunction - male Including erectile dysfunction, impotence, dry and/or painful ejaculation, haematospermia and reduction in ejaculate. Patients should be offered sexual counselling to manage potential late effects related to sexual function.
-Sexual dysfunction - female Including dyspareunia, vaginal dryness and vaginal stenosis.
-Premature ovarian failure/menopause - If ovaries present.
-Impaired fertility or infertility Fertility preservation should be discussed prior to commencement of treatment.
-Second malignancy

  • Pooled RTOG analysis [Efstathiou JCO ‘09]: Late effects of bladder preservation do not appear prohibitive.
    No radical cystectomies were performed due to late treatment-related toxicity.
    ○ 285 pts. RTOG 8903, 9506, 9706, 9906.
    ○ 5y late G2 10% (9.6% GU, 1.9% GI).
    ○ 5y late G3 7% (5.7% GU, 1.9% GI). No G4 events, no pts req’d RC due to treatment related toxicity.
    § Median duration of late G3 pelvic toxicity of 7.1 months. Time to late G3 of ~2 years.
  • Quality of life [Zietman JoU ‘03]: Normal bladder fxn preserved in most pts w ~20% having persistent bowel sx.
    ○ 71 pts alive and w native bladders. 49 pts participated, but only 31 came in for urodynamic study. Median f/u 6.3y.
    ○ Of those that did UDS, 24/32 (75%) with normally functioning bladders.
    § Decreased compliance in 7 pts (22%).
    § Bladder HSN, involuntary detrusor contractions and incontinence in 2 women.
    ○ > 85% no bothersome urinary symptoms.
    § 6% flow sx, 15% urgency, and 19% control problems.
    ○ Bowel sx in 22% (e.g. rectal urgency), with 14% recording any level of distress.
    ○ 50% normal erectile function.
  • BC 2001, James et al
    Acute G3-4 36% (21% GU, 10% GI), late G3-4 ~5% with CCRT.
31
Q

Describe the radiation technique for adjuvant/recurrent bladder cancer.

A

Adjuvant (NRG-GU001)

Patients
Post cystectomy; consider chemo or PORT
pT3-pT4a, SM+, ECE, or < 10 LN

Pre-simulation
MDT discussion

Simulation
Fusion

Dose prescription
pT3-4, SM+ or ECE:
* Pelvic nodes 45-50.4 Gy
* cystectomy bed (if SM+) 54-60 Gy.
LR after RC:
* 45-50Gy to pelvic nodes
* 60-65Gy to gross LR
* with CDDP

Volumes
○ CTV_50.4:
§ PLN only if SM-, include cystectomy bed if SM+.
○ CTVn_50.4:
§ Presacrals (1-1.5 cm anterior to sacrum), bilateral distal common iliac, EI, II, obturators.
§ Extends from top of L5-S1 to top of S3.
○ CTVp_50.4 (SM+ only):
§ Ant: mid-plane of pubis above pubis, posterior plane of pubis below pubis.
§ Post: abut anterior 1/3 of rectum without extending into rectum.
§ Sup: 2 cm sup to pubic symphysis.
§ Inf: Stop 2-3 mm above penile bulb, or 1 cm below lower pole of obturator foramen.
○ PTV 0.5-0.7 cm expansion.

Target Verification

OARs
Bowel bag V40 < 30% (50%), Rectum V45 < 70% (80%). Bowel bag contoured 3 cm above L5-S1.

31
Q

Describe the radiation technique for definitive bladder cancer treatment.

A

Definitive Chemoradiotherapy

Patients
1) MIBC

Pre-simulation
MDT discussion
Maximal TURBT upfront
Consider ureteric stenting prior to RT
Fertility discussion
Smoking cessation

Simulation
Supine with arms on chest
Vacbag, knee-block and ankle-stocks
Bladder empty
Empty rectum
Generous CT (2mm without contrast)
- Diaphragm to below ischial tuberosity (include entire kidneys)

Fusion
MR fusion (if available)

Dose prescription
Single Dose Level
- 64Gy/32F prescribed to the PTV
- 55Gy/20F prescribed to the PTV
2-phase bladder only:
- 50Gy/25Fx + 14Gy/7Fx to tumour area with margin, usually treated with full bladder to minimise bowel dose
- (not used in AUS as far as I can tell)
Two Dose Level (SIB)
- 64Gy/32F to the primary + 60-64Gy to involved nodes
- 54Gy/32F to the elective nodes (EQD2 50)
- 55Gy/20F primary and involved, 45Gy/20F to the nodes
Concurrent chemotherapy
- Cisplatin at 35mg/m2 (weekly)
- MMC at 12mg/m2 & 5-FU at 2500mg/m2 over 5 days (q3wk)

VMAT technique
10 days per fortnight

Volumes
Primary
- GTV
○ Residual disease (if present)
- CTV
○ Entire bladder
○ GTV + 5mm (to account for extravesical)
○ Consider:
○ Include prostate/prox urethra if - bladder neck/trigone involved, multiple tumours or CIS
○ Prostate if invasion
○ Include 1cm distal ureter if VUJ is involved
- PTV
○ CTV + anisotropic margin
○ Sup = 1.5cm (may need less if small bowel)
○ Ant/Post/Lat = 1.5cm
○ Inf = 1cm
Nodal (if node positive)

  • GTV64
    ○ Involved nodes
  • CTV64
    ○ GTV + 7mm
  • PTV64
    ○ CTV + 7mm
  • CTV54
    ○ Internal iliac, External iliac and obturator nodes, consider presacral, common iliac
  • PTV54
    ○ CTV + 7mm

Target Verification
Daily CBCT
Consider adaptive approach

OARs
Small Bowel
- ALARA (avoid hotspots)
- V45 < 195cc
Rectum
- 64Gy/32#= V50 < 50%
- 55Gy/20#= V44Gy <50%
Femoral Heads
- 64Gy/32#= V50Gy <10%
- 55Gy/20#= V44Gy <10%
Spinal Cord/Cauda Equina
- Dmax < 45Gy

32
Q

Describe the palliative radiation technique for bladder cancer

A

Palliative

Patients
1) Symptomatic disease

Pre-simulation
MDT discussion
Fertility discussion
Smoking cessation
Consider ureteric stenting prior to RT

Simulation
Supine with arms on chest
Vacbag, knee-block and ankle-stocks
Generous CT (2mm without contrast)
- Diaphragm to below ischial tuberosity (include entire kidneys)

Fusion
N/A

Dose prescription
Single Dose Level (multiple options)
- 50Gy/20F
- 36Gy/6F (twice per week)
- 37.5Gy/15Fx
- 21Gy/3F (weekly)
- 8Gy/1F
VMAT technique
9 days per fortnight

Volumes
- GTV
○ Residual disease (if present)
- CTV
○ Entire bladder
○ GTV + 5mm (to account for extravesical)
- PTV
○ CTV + anisotropic margin
○ Sup = 2cm
○ Ant/Post/Lat = 1.5cm
○ Inf = 1cm

Target Verification
Daily CBCT

33
Q

Discuss the prognosis and follow up for muscle invasive bladder cancer with tri-modality therapy

A

MIBC (with tri-modality therapy)
RTOG pooled data
- 5 year OS = 50-60% (old crumbly pts)
- 5 year CSS = 60-75%
○ Recurrence in nodes in 12%, Metastasis in 30%
- 5 year LC = 70-80%
○ Clinical complete response 70-80% (50% if no chemo)
○ Muscle invasive recurrence 15%
○ NMIBC recurrence 30%
- Bladder preservation 80% @ 5 years

Yuvnik ph2 newcastle talk
TMT
5 year OS 50%
Bladder preservation 66%
30% acute g3-4 toxicity, 5% late toxicity

Recurrence: local 15%
Node 15%
Distant 30%

Follow-Up

MIBC After Tri-modality Therapy

- Clinical review every three months for the first two years
	○ Cystoscopy every three months
	○ Urine cytology every six months
	○ Bloods including urine function every six months
	○ CT CAP every six months
		§ Or MRI q6-12m 
- Clinical review every six months for years 3-5
	○ Cystoscopy every six months CT CAP every twelve months
34
Q

Discuss the prognosis and follow up of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer after TURBT

A

Non-MIBC -after TURBT

- Up to 50% recur within 6-12 months
	○ Up to 20% will be MIBC at recurrence
- Low grade <5% progress to invasion; 50-70% recurrence
- High grade 15-40% progress to invasion; 50-80% recurrence 
- CIS 50-75% progress to invasion without any treatment

- Risk factors for recurrence
	○ Stage (T1 is worst)
	○ Grade
	○ Multifocality
	○ Size (>3cm)

Follow-Up
With High-Risk Non-MIBC

- Clinical review every three months for the first two years
	○ Cystoscopy every three months
	○ Urine cytology every six months
- Clinical review every six months for years 3-5
	○ Cystoscopy every six months

No role for routine CT imaging
No role for routine bloods

35
Q

Describe the management of metastatic bladder cancer

A

Cisplatin was mainstay of treatment up until 2024

Now ddMVAC if fit as this is where evidence is (vs cis/gem) ->if stable or good response ->Maintenance with Avelumab (continuous) as per Javelin trial
It not fit for chemo, then can use pembrolizumab upfront (Keynote –052 for 24 months total. OS 11.3months

* Enfortimab vedotin –antibody-drug conjugate –Second line –can have long term survivial 
	○ Median survival time -  12.8months
	○ Target is Nectin 4 SE of peripheral neuropathy and pruritic/ rash
36
Q

Discuss the epidemiology for renal cancers.

A

Incidence (Australian statistics):
- 4193 cases annually
- 7th most common malignancy in Australia (2% of total cancer incidence)
Incidence is rising (early detection does not fully explain this observation)

Male predominance (2:1)
Disease of the elderly (generally 60yo+)
- Exception is Wilm’s tumour (disease of children)

RCC = 80-95% of primary renal cancers
Mostly adenocarcinoma (cc)
65% localised, 16% regional nodes, 15-25% metastatic disease: Lung, bone, brain or retrograde venous spread to ovary/testes
Most common in high socioeconomic countries
- Common in North America + Scandinavia
Less common in Asia and South America

37
Q

Discuss the risk factors for renal cancers

A

Convincing risk factors:
1) Smoking (RR <1.5)
a. Smoking also associated with advanced presentation
2) Obesity, high dietary fat
a. Obesity associated with earlier stage and low grade disease
3) HTN
4) Acquired kidney diseases (RR up to 30)
a. End-stage renal failure (ESRF) of any cause
b. Cystic kidney disease
c. Renal stones (RR 2)
5) Occupational exposures
a. Asbestos
b. Lead and cadmium (heavy metals)
c. Petroleum materials
d. Thorotrast (old-school radiological contrast)
6) Prior radiotherapy or cytotoxic chemotherapy
7) Genetic causes (see below)
8) Analgesic abuse nephropathy ↑ risk of collecting duct tumours/TCC of renal pelvis.
9) Dialysis patients (6% develop RCC)

Protective factors:
- Alcohol consumption
- Exercise

Genetic Causes

1) Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) syndrome: 3p25
	a. 50% of sporadic RCC has silencing VHL mutation
	b. Autosomal dominant inheritance, 1/36000
	c. With high lifetime risk of RCC (50-70%) --> predominantly clear cell
	d. VHL --> Implicated in the physiological hypoxia & angiogenesis pathway
		i. Part of Ubiquitin ligase that turns off HIF
	e. Retinal/CNS haemangioblastoma, Pancreatic NET and  phaeochromocytomas
		i. Ongoing surveillance: annual BP, eye, UA, second yearly hearing, MRI brain+spine, abdo
2) Hereditary leiomyomatosis and RCC syndrome
	a. Autosomal dominant mutation of the FH gene (fumarate hydratase --> Kreb's cycle)
		i. ?similar to IDH mutation. Induces glycolysis/lactate
	b. Presents with cutaneous & uterine leiomyomatous tumours
	c. Also presents with aggressive papillary carcinomas (RCC) with high metastatic risk
3) Hereditary papillary renal carcinoma
	a. Autosomal dominant mutations in the MET (TK gene) proto-oncogene
	b. Presents often with multiple bilateral RCC with papillary appearance
4) Birt-Hogg-Dube syndrome (BHD)
	a. Autosomal dominant mutation of the BHD gene (responsible for folliculin expression)
	b. As well as RCC (various types), can present with skin lesions/pulmonary cysts/Pneumothorax
	c. Renal tumours: Clear cell, Oncocytomas 
	d. Penetrance of 30%
5) Tuberous sclerosis
	a. TSE1/TSE2
	b. Increased risk of angiomyolipomas (AML) and RCC
		i. Multiple hamartomas (benign CNS, renal, liver, lung, skin lesions,  eye),  intellectual delay, autism, 
	c. Only 5% risk of RCC
38
Q

List the histological subtypes of primary renal cancer.

A

Malignant Histological Subtypes

1) Clear cell (75-80%)
2) Papillary or chromophilic (10-15%)
3) Chromophobic (5-10%)
4) Oncocytic (3-5%)
5) Collecting duct (very rare)

- Typically arise in upper pole. Often invade renal vein +/or collecting duct.
39
Q

Describe the pathology for clear cell RCC.

A

Clear cell RCC
- worse than papillary or chromophobe
- Macroscopic
○ Well-defined lesion with pseudocapsule; white to yellow coloration
○ Common to have haemorrhage or necrosis associated
○ Tends to invade the renal vein
- Microscopic
○ Round or polygonal cells
○ Characterised by cells with abundant cytoplasmic lipid & glycogen (hence “clear cell”)
○ Generally, nuclei are close to normal (WD)
○ Delicate branching vasculature (chicken-wire)

- Arise in the proximal tubule epithelium 
	○ Usually solitary in presentation
- Typically present with a deletion in chromosome 3p (98%)
- Linked with VHL mutation (both sporadic or germline/familial)
- IHC: RCC ma (specific antibody) positive, Vimentin positive, PAX 2/8 positive, CA9 positive, Ck7/20 neg, c-KIT neg
40
Q

Describe the pathology for papillary/chromophilic RCC

A

Papillary/chromophilic RCC
- Macroscopic
○ Well circumscribed tumour with pseudocapsule (often associated haemorrhage)
○ Tan to light brown in colour
○ Often multifocal or bilateral
- Microscopic
○ Cuboidal or low columnar cells in papillary pattern (fibrovascular core)
○ Psammoma bodies present (calcification)
○ Foamy macrophages often present

- Also arise from proximal tubule
- Two key types: Type 1 is low grade with better prognosis than type 2 high grade (larger nuclei, more cytoplasm
	○ Type 1 = favourable prognosis
		§ Associated with hereditary papillary RCC (MET mutation)
	○ Type 2 = poor prognosis, more agressive
		§ Advanced stage at presentation ie. N+ and/or mets 
		§ Associated with leiomyomatosis and RCC syndrome (FH mutation) IHC: RCC ma (specific antibody) positive, CK7 positive, PAX 2/8 positive, c-KIT positive
41
Q

Describe the pathology for chromophobic RCC

A

Chromophobic RCC
- Better DFS than clear cell
- Arise from intercalated cells of collecting ducts
Chromophobe cell - light coloured pale cytoplasm (flocculant), perinuclear halo, bi-nucleated, thick distinct cytoplams.
Eosinophilic cells – dark nuclei with prominent deep pink cytoplasm.

- Macroscopic
	○ Well circumscribed; tan to light brown in colour
	○ Occasionally have central scar
- Microscopic
	○ Lack the abundant lipid and glycogen classic of most RCCs
	○ Prominent cell membranes with pale eosinophilic cytoplasm (halo around nucleus - koilocytic)
	○ Wrinkled nuclei (raisinoid)
	○ Arranged in solid sheets concentrated around vessels
	
- Associated with upregulation of KIT oncogene
- Good prognosis relative to clear cell variant
- IHC: RCC ma (specific antibody) variable, Ck7 positive, PAX 8 positive, CA9 negative
42
Q

Describe the pathology for Collecting duct RCC

A

Collecting Duct RCC
- 1% of RCC (rare), from distal collecting ducts. Poor prognosis
- 2/3 men, age 50-60yrs, but can occur in younger pts
- Associated with analgesic nephropathy
- MICRO: hobnail cells with a desmoplastic stroma and cystic tubular structures.
- Frequently demonstrate and aggressive disease course
- Medullary carcinoma is a common variant (arise from cells in renal medulla)
IHC: RCC ma negative, PAX8 positive, Vimentin Positive

43
Q

Describe the RCC Fuhrmann/WHO-ISUP grading

A
  • Relates to visibility/prominence of nucleoli
    • Fuhrmann was old -based on nuclei. New is WHO Nucleioli
    • – based on nuclear characteristics and nucleoli. Grades 1-3 based on nucleolar prominence, while grade 4: highly pleomorphic tumor giant cells or the presence of sarcomatoid and/or rhabdoid morphology○ Grade 1 = nucleoli absent at 400x magnification
      ○ Grade 2 = nucleoli prominent at 400x magnification
      ○ Grade 3 = nucleoli prominent at 100x magnification
      ○ Grade 4 = extreme nuclear pleomorphism (giant cells, sarcomatoid/rhabdoid change)

Most relevant for clear cell (less relevance for other subtypes)

44
Q

Describe common benign renal lesions.

A

Relevant Benign Lesions (less common – 40% of tumours <1cm)

Oncocytoma
- Mimic renal cell carcinoma
- Macroscopic
○ Well circumscribed lesions; tan to mahogany brown
○ Central stellate scar often present
- Microscopic
○ Well circumscribed without capsule
○ Consist of a pure population of large WD neoplastic cells characterised by dense mitochondria
○ Few mitoses, no necrosis
- May progress to chromophobe RCC if it develops p53 mutations

- Benign natural history (rarely metastasise despite large size)
- Arise in the intercalated cells of the collecting system
- Associated with tuberous sclerosis and BHD syndrome

Papillary renal adenoma
- Small, discrete adenomas arising from the tubular epithelium
○ Benign, do not require management

- Microscopic
	○ Generally <1.5cm in diameter
	○ Frequently papillary in appearance
	○ Cut section = Generally pale yellow-to-grey with well circumscribed edge (no capsule)
- Microscopic
	○ Complex, branching, papillomatous structures with numerous fronds
	○ Cuboidal to polygonal cells with scanty cytoplasm
	○ Small regular centrally-located nuclei

- Histologically, very similar to low-grade papillary carcinoma (type 1)
	○ Size < 3cm is defining distinction
	○ Metastasis is rare below this size

Angiomyolipoma (AML)
- Benign mesenchymal tumours consisting of vascular, smooth muscle and fat tissue
○ Arise from perivascular epithelioid cells

- Macroscopic
	○ Well-circumscribed tumours with pushing border (no capsule)
	○ Variable appearance depending on dominant component (red = vascular; white/grey = muscle; yellow = fat)
	○ Generally unilateral and single
	○ Fat content gives classic radiological appearances (esp MR)
- Microscopic
	○ Triphasic appearance with spindle cells, adipose tissue and dysmorphic thick-walled vessels

- An epithelioid variant also exists (fat-poor)
	○ Addition of epithelioid cells in the tumour
	○ Loss of fat makes radiological diagnosis difficult (needs biopsy)
	○ Increased chance of malignant transformation (still unusual)

- Whilst benign, are associated with haemorrhage (when lesions are large)
- Associated with tuberous sclerosis (25-50% of patients will develop AML)

Ddx:
Renal pelvis Transitional cell
Neuroendocrine

45
Q

Describe the prognostic factors for renal cancer.

A

Patient Factors

* Age and performance status
* Symptomatic disease (e.g. anaemia, hypercalcaemia, weight loss)
	○ Imparts worse prognosis
* Renal function
	○ Suitability for nephrectomy
* presence of paraneoplastic syndromes, (St4- ↑LDH, ↑Ca, ↓Hb)

Tumour Factors

* Stage at Dx most important
* T-stage
	○ Size (i.e. T1 vs T2)
	○ Invasion of collecting system or perinephric fat are important prognostic checkpoints
	○ Invasion of vasculature (renal vein or IVC) is also highly relevant
* N-stage & M-stage

* Fuhrman/WHO histological grade
* Histological subtype (controversial)
	○ Clear-cell carcinoma may be worse
* Other histological features
	○ Necrosis
	○ Sarcomatoid/rhabdoid subtype
* Solitary lesion
* Lung mets alone do better than other mets

Treatment Factors

* Suitability for nephrectomy

NOTE: positive surgical margins do not necessary predict recurrence (no clear impact on prognosis)

46
Q

List the factors to consider when considering a patient for upfront management of metastatic renal cancer

A

Suitability for Upfront Treatment of Metastatic Disease

IMDC Score (Heng score)
- Karnofsky score < 80
- Time from diagnosis < 1 year
- Hb below LLN
- Ca elevated above ULN
- Absolute neutrophil count elevated above ULN
- Plt elevated above ULN

0 factors = low-risk
1-2 factors = intermediate-risk
3+ = high-risk

47
Q

Discuss the history and examination for RCC

A
  • History
    ○ HPI
    § Majority are incidental on imaging (25-40%)
    § Classical triad (10%)
    □ Haematuria (in 40%)
    □ Abdominal pain
    □ Renal flank mass
    § Scrotal varicocoele (due to gonadal vein obstruction
    ○ Paraneoplastic syndromes
    § RCC is the great ‘mimic’ due to paraneoplastic syndromes of:
    □ Hypercalcaemia (due to lytic bone mets, PTHrP production or prostaglandin prodn causing bone resorption), Cushings (prednisone secretion), HTN, polycythaemia, masculinisation, feminization, cachexia.
    § Anaemia (normocytic, normochromic)
    § Hepatic dysfunction in absence of metastases (Stauffer syndrome)
    § Fevers
    ○ PMHx:
    § Benign kidney disease (e.g. ESRF)
    § Previous radiotherapy
    ○ Family History
    § Genetic syndromes include
    □ Von Hippel Lindau
    □ Birt-Hogg-Dube
    □ Tuberous Sclerosis
    ○ Social
    § Smoking
    § Occupational exposures (e.g. heavy metals)
    ○ 25% metastasis at presentation (Mostly lung and bone, then brain)
    • Examination
      ○ General Appearance
      ○ Abdominal examination
      § Including renal flank
      ○ Urine MCS
48
Q

Discuss the work up for RCC.

A
  • Imaging
    ○ CT AP +/- US urinary tract
    § Good to assess size and complexity of any cystic mass
    § Assess local extent and LN invovlement
    § DDx: simple cyst, tumour, abscess
    ○ CT chest for mets
    ○ WBBS, MRI brain if indicated
    ○ MR kidney
    § Particularly good at evaluating fat content and vascular involvement
    • Bloods
      ○ FBC, EUC, CMP and LFT
      § Assess for key paraneoplastic syndromes
      ○ LDH (prognostic)
    • Renal DMSA scan
      ○ If planning for surgical management
    • Histopathology
      ○ NO role for biopsy
      Proceed directly to partial/total nephrectomy if suspicion is sufficient
49
Q

Discuss solid renal masess and also the bosniak score for cystic renal masess.

A

Solid renal masses
- Larger the renal mass, the more likely malignant
- Most solid renal masses > 1.5cm are RCCs. Differentials are oncocytoma, angiomyolipoma or renal cortical adenoma.
- Imaging alone cannot reliably distinguish between benign tumour + RCC.
- When imaging suggests solid renal mass > 1.5cm, tissue normally obtained by total or partial nephrectomy. i.e. diagnosis is usually presumptive for tumours > 1.5cm.
For lesions < 1.5cm, no defined method of Mx. Active surveillance is reasonable.

Bosniak Score for Cystic renal masses

- Scoring system to estimate risk of malignancy for cystic renal masses
	○ Based on CT alone

- Bosniak I
	○ Benign simple cyst
		§ Thin wall
		§ No septae or solid components
- Bosniak II
	○ Minimally complex benign cyst
		§ Few hairline thin septae
- Bosniak IIF
	○ Minimally complex cyst
		§ Multiple thin septae
		§ Presence of calcification
	○ Requires follow-up (5% risk of malignancy)
- Bosniak III
	○ Indeterminant cyst
		§ Thickened walls with septae
	○ Requires surgical resection (55% risk of malignancy)
- Bosniak IV
	○ Malignant mass
		§ Enhancing soft tissue components Requires oncological management (100% risk of malignancy)