Gender Differences-internal Factors Flashcards
Policies that encourage feminism in schools
Policies such as GIST(girls into science and technology) and WISE(women into science and engineering) encourage girls to pursue careers in these non-traditional areas
Changes to the national curriculum in regards to feminism
Removed one source of gender inequality by making girls and boys study mostly the same subjects , which was often not the case previously
Boaler(1998)
Sees the impact of equal opportunities policies as a key reason for the changes in girls’ achievement
Many of the barriers have been removed and schooling has become more meritocratic
Positive role models in schools for women
These women in senior positions may act as role models for girls , showing them women can achieve positions of importance and giving them non-traditional goals to aim for
Gorard(2005)🙄
Gorard found that the gender gap in achievement was fairly constant from 1975- 1989, when it increased sharply
- this was the year in which GCSE was introduced, bringing it coursework as a major part of nearly all subjects
Gorard concludes that the gender gap in achievement is a ‘product of the changes system of assessment rather than any more general failing of boys’
Eirene mitsos and Ken Browne (1998) support Godard’s view
They conclude that girls are more successful in coursework because they are more conscientious and better organised than boys
Girl:
- spend more time on their work
- take more care with the way it is presented
- are better at meeting deadlines
- bring the right equipment and materials to lessons
Janette Elwood (2005)
Argues that although coursework has some influence, it is unlikely to be the only cause of the gender gap because exams have much more influence than coursework on final grades
Jane and French (1993) the way teachers interact with boys and girls
- they analysed classroom interaction, they found that boys received more attention because they attracted more reprimands
Francis (2001)
Found that whilst boys got more attention, they were disciplined more harshly and felt picked on by teachers, who tended to have lower expectations of them
Swann(1998)
- Found gender differences in communication styles
- Boys dominate whole- class discussions, whereas girls prefer pair - work and group-work and are better at listening and cooperating
- when working in groups, girls’ speech involves turn taking, and not the hostile interruptions that often characterise boys’ speech
This may explain why teachers respond more positively to girls, whom they see as cooperative
May lead to a self fulfilling prophecy
Gaby Weiner(1995)
Argues that since the 1980s, teachers have challenged such stereotypes
Sexist images have been removed from learning materials
This may have helped to raise girls’ achievement by presenting them with more positive images of what women can do
Marketisation policies
They’ve created a more competitive climate in which schools see girls as desirable recruits because they achieve better exam results
David Jackson(1998)
Notes that the introduction of exam league tables has improved opportunities for girls: high- achieving girls are more attractive to school whereas low achieving boys are not
This creates a self fulfilling prophecy because girls are more likely to be recruited by good schools, they are then more likely to do well
Roger slee (1998)
Boys are less attractive to schools because they are more likely to suffer from behavioural difficulties and are 4 more times likely to excluded
As a result boys may be seen as ‘liability students’ - obstacles to the school improving its league tables
Two views of girls’ achievement
Liberal feminists
Radical feminists
Liberal feminists
- Celebrate the progress made so far in improving achievement
- Similar to the functionalist view that education is a meritocracy where all individuals are given equal opportunity
- believe further progress will be made
Radical feminists
- take a more critical view
- they acknowledge girls are acheiveing more, but they emphasise that the system remains patriarchal
- conveys the message that it’s still a man’s world
- Weiner(1993) describes the secondary school history curriculum as a ‘woman free zone’
Symbolic capital- Louise archer
- Feminist archer, differences in the social classes achievement is the conflict between working- class girls’ feminine identities and values and ethos of the school
- symbolic capital refers to status, recognition and sense of worth we are able to obtain from others
- working class feminine identities gained the symbolic capital but brought them into conflict with school( preventing them from acquiring educational capital)
What several strategies do working class girls adopt(Archer)
- adopting a hyper-heterosexual feminine identity
- having a boyfriend
- being ‘loud’
What are hyper heterosexual feminine identities
- working class girls constructed identities that combined black urban American styles with unisex sportswear and ‘sexy’ clothes, make up and hairstyles
Bourdieu and hyper heterosexual feminine identities
- working class girls’ hyper heterosexual feminine identities brought them symbolic capital whilst bringing them conflict with school
- this led to schools defining them as ‘not one of us’ and thus less worthy of respect
- bourdieu describes this as symbolic violence
Archer and the ideal female pupil
From the schools point of view, the ideal female pupil is a desexualised, middle class one that excludes many working class girls
Boyfriends and symbolic capital
- having a boyfriend brought girls symbolic capital
- these girls lost interest in going to university and studying ‘masculine’ subjects such as science or in gaining a professional career
- these girls aspired to ‘settle down’ instead
Working class girls ‘ being loud’
- some working class girls adopted ‘loud’ feminine identities
- led them to be assertive, outspoken and independent
- this was far from the stereotype teachers had of girls and brought conflict with them
- teachers interpreted their behaviour as aggressive rather than assertive