Ethnic Differences In Achievement-institutional Racism Flashcards
Define individual racism
Results from the prejudiced views of individual teachers and others
Define institutional racism
Discrimination that is built into the way institutions such as schools and colleges
Critical race theory
Sees racism as an ingrained feature society
This means that it involves not just the intentional actions of individuals, but more importantly, institutional racism.
Daria Roithmayr (2003) ‘locked- in equality’
- institutional racism is ‘locked- in inequality’
- the scale of historical discrimination is so large that there no longer needs to be any conscious intent to discriminate- the inequality becomes self- perpetuating: it feeds on itself
Gillbourn (2008) (locked-in inequality)
- Applies the concept of locked-in inequality to education
- he sees ethnic inequality as ‘so deep rooted and so large that it is a practically inevitable feature of the education system’
Critical race theorists see the education system as institutionally racist in several ways
Gillbourn(1997) and marketisation
- Gillbourn argues that marketisation gives schools more scope to select pupils, it allows negative stereotypes to influence decisions about school admissions
Moore and Davenport’s(1990) American research
- They show how selection procedures lead to ethnic segregation, with minority pupils failing to get into better secondary schools due to discrimination
- they found that primary school reports were used to screen out pupils with language difficulties, while the application process was difficult for non- English speaking parents to understand
These procedures favoured white pupils and disadvantaged ethnic minorities
Moore and Davenport conclude that selection leads to an ethnically stratified education system
The commission for racial equality(1993)
Noted that racism in school admissions procedures means that ethnic minority children are more likely to end up in unpopular schools
The report identifies the following reasons:
- reports from primary schools that stereotype minority pupils
- racist bias in interviews for school places
- lack of information and application forms in minority languages
- ethnic minority parents are often unaware of how the waiting list system works and the importance of deadlines
Ethnocentric curriculum
- many sociologists see the ethnocentric curriculum as a prime example of institutional racism because it builds a racial bias into the everyday workings of schools and colleges
Examples of the ethnocentric curriculum:
•languages, literature and music
- Troyna and Williams note the meagre provision for teaching Asian languages as compared with European languages
-Miriam David(1993) describes the national curriculum as a ‘specifically British’ curriculum that largely ignores non- European languages, literature and music
• History
-Ball(1994) criticises the national curriculum for ignoring ethnic diversity and for promoting an attitude of ‘little Englandism’
Eg, the history curriculum tries to recreate a ‘mythical age of empire and past glories’, while ignoring the history of black and Asian people
Bernard Coard(1971;2005)
-explains how the ethnocentric curriculum may produce underachievement
- Eg, I’m history the British may be presented as bringing civilisation to the ‘primitive’ peoples they colonised
- he argues that this image of black people as inferior undermines black children’s self esteem and leads to their failure
Criticisms of ethnocentric curriculum as a cause of underachievement
- it’s not clear what impact the ethnocentric curriculum has
- it may ignore Asian culture, but achievement is above the national average
- Maureen stone argues that black children do not suffer from low self esteem
Assessment - Gillbourn(2008)
- argues the ‘assessment game’ is rigged so as to validate the dominant culture’s superiority
- if black children succeed as a group, ‘the rules will be changed to re-engineer failure’
- eg, in the past primary schoolers used baseline assessments which tested pupils when they started compulsory schooling . However these measures were replaced in 2003 by foundation stage profile
- the result was that overnight black pupils seemed to be doing worse than white pupils
Gillbourn reasons for whites doing better than blacks over night
1) FSP is based on teacher judgements
2) FSP completed at the end of revelation year
Both these factors increase the risk of teachers stereotyping affecting resujts
2 access to opportunities
• the ‘gifted and Talented’ programme was created with the aim of meeting the needs of more able pupils in inner-city schools(Gillbourn shows whites are twice as more likely to be identified as gifted than blacks)
• Exam tiers
- Tikly (2006) found that in 30 schools in the ‘aiming high’ initiative to raise black Caribbean pupils’ achievement, blacks were nevertheless more likely than whites to be entered for lower tier GCSE exams