Gender Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is gender / how does gender work?

A
  • Societal expectations of men/women, e.g. boys wear blue, girls wear pink.
  • Gender differences caused by upbringing, interactions with our society and culture and our environment.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Where do gender roles come from?

A
  • Way we speak to a child, e.g. ‘where’s my princess’, ‘where’s my big boys’.
  • Clothing -> boys wear lots of blue, girls wear pink/dresses etc, flowers, pastel colours.
  • TV cartoons, e.g. Peppa pig wears dress whilst brother wears blue.
  • the influence of the media etc.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is gender representation?

A
  • How images of men and women are portrayed in, e.g. books, adverts, scripts and the media. The image an audience is given of men + women.
    • Image may reinforce stereotypes or may challenge stereotypical attitudes.
  • Children not coded (boys like blue, girls pink etc) WE (society) condition them to do this, e.g. shops, boys clothes are blue, have dinos etc, girls are pink, dresses etc.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the stereotypes usually given to men in the media?

A
  • Strength (physical + intellectual) - e.g. Yorker bar ad, not for women.
  • Powerful
  • Sexual attractiveness / physique
  • independence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the representations usually given to women in the media?

A
  • beauty (within narrow conventions) - L’Oréal ads, well-known celebs.
  • Physique.
  • Sexuality - e.g. Muller ads -> Nicole (from Pussy cat Dolls).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How does male talk compare to female talk?

A

Male talk:
- Straight-forward
- swearing

Female talk:
- Apologetic
- Nurturing?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What did Charles de Rochefort say about gender in ‘natural + moral history of the Antilles islands of America’?

A
  • Some features of lang used only by males, vice versa with females -> clear links to masculinity.
    • Lang used to main identity - idea of performance (job interviews etc).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Describe the impact/influence of Robin Lakoff (1975) ‘Language and women’s place’

A
  • during 20 years after publish, ‘met with widespread criticism’
    • Lakoff admits it is her impression’, not ‘based on precise statistical evidence’.
    • Uses uncertain phrases in book like ‘many men’ and ‘men tend to’.
  • However launched ‘far reaching program of research’ which are still felt today.
  • Lakoff’s work is still often quoted today.
  • representative of the ‘deficit approach’.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

List the main features of female speech in Robin Lakoff’s book:

A
  • Super-polite forms: ‘would you mind’, ‘is it OK if?’.
  • Apologies more: ‘I’m sorry, but I think that’.
  • Hedges phrases like ‘sort of’, ‘kind of’, ‘it seems like’.
  • Empty adjectives: ‘divine, adorable, gorgeous’
  • avoid coarse language or expletives.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the ‘deficit approach’ to language and gender and who is it attributed to?

A
  • Otto Jesperson (in 1922) argued male lang forms were the ‘norm’ and the Lang of others (including women) were ‘deficient’.
  • Considering list of Lakoff female features -> apparent why it may be seen as ‘weaker’.
  • Lakoff saw female lang as deficient.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Describe Jenny Cheshire’s study on children (1982)

A
  • Looked at certain grammatical variations in speech of children, considered frequency of children using: non-standard ‘has’ (you has to), non-standard ‘was’ (you was), non-standard ‘do’ (she do), use of ‘ain’t’ (I ain’t).
  • boys use non-standard forms more frequently -> due to vernacular culture of boys (sports, dinos, video games, cars.
  • Boy’s speech governed by norms, transmitted through peer group.
  • variation in girls’ speech appears to be a personal process and less controlled by norms.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Describe Pamela Fishman’s (1983) dominance model and her theory

A
  • Focused on tag questions, listened 52 hours of pre-recorded conversations between young American couples.
  • Agreed with Lakoff, tag Qs used by women more.
  • Argued for girls, Qs used to start conversations and sustain conversation.
    • use for conversational power rather than uncertainty.
  • Try to keep conversation, ‘conversation shit work’.
  • Fishman accepts this is due to male dominance, don’t do shit because they should not as the dominant role.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Describe Deborah Tannen’s difference model

A
  • ‘there are gender differences in ways of speaking’.
  • advocated idea that men and women speak differently.
  • established 6 differences between sexes in language:
    • status vs support
    • Independence vs intimacy
    • advice vs understanding
    • Orders vs proposals
    • Conflict vs Compromise
  • Different from deficit model, lang not used by men to be dominant although it is different.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the status vs support difference (difference model)

A
  • Men use language to show power and dominance in conversations.
  • women are more likely to use language choices to support and agree with others.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the independency vs intimacy (difference model)?

A
  • Men will use language to show they do not need to rely on others.
  • women will prefer to use language as a way of connecting with others and maintaining closeness.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the advice vs understanding difference (difference model)

A
  • Similar to Tannen’s Advise Vs Understanding concept, men are far more likely to be factual in their language choices.
  • women will use language choices that are less factual and stem from a more emotional viewpoint.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is the orders vs proposals difference (difference model)?

A
  • men more likely to be direct in lang, using imperatives to command others.
  • Women avoid using commanding tone and be more suggestive in lang choices.
  • E.g. man: ‘close that window as it’s cold’,
    Women: ‘isn’t it cold in here’.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What is the conflict vs compromise difference (difference model)?

A
  • Men use lang to argue a point.
  • Women use lang to avoid conflict and more likely to negotiate with others to try and find a solution or compromise.
19
Q

Describe Jennifer Coates’ research on the difference model (1989)

A
  • Girls and boys tend to belong to same-sex friendship groups when growing up and subsequently develop different styles of speaking.
  • Female lang cooperative in single-sex conversations.
    • Tag questions and modality as characteristics that help to make women’s talk supportive and cooperative.
20
Q

Describe Jane Pilkington’s research on the difference model (1992)

A
  • Women in same-sex conversations were collaborative and used positive politeness strategies.
    • Inclusive pronouns ‘us’, ‘we’, men use exclusive pronouns like ‘I’ and ‘you’ more freq.
  • Women support, build on each others’ points and complete others’ utterances -> ‘also’, ‘yes, because’.
  • Men in same sex talk were a lot less collaborative, less complimentary and less supportive than women.
    • Competitive to point of verbal abuse -> take part in verbal sparring -> often using mock insults, ‘pillock, moron, bastard etc’.
21
Q

Describe Deborah Cameron’s views on the difference model (2008)

A
  • difference in speech is ‘one of great myths of our time’. -> ‘Myth of Mars and Venus.
  • Myths evolved on ideas that women pay more attention to being good communicators than men, men have natural desire to be competitive resulting in aggressive speech style.
  • Provides re-evaluation of stereotypes on male and female talk.
  • Argues myths actually shape expectations of men and women.
  • Her work representative of studies that move away from categorising male/female talk as driven by biological differences.
22
Q

What is Janet Hyde’s ‘gender similarities hypothesis’ (2005)?

A
  • Claims there are differences between male/female lang.
  • where there are differences: due to other variables like age, class, ethnicity, education, occupation, sexuality, politics etc.
23
Q

What is the gender ‘performativity’ theory?

A
  • coined by Judith Butler -> may be used to project on identity rather then reinforce gender stereotypes.
  • in book ‘gender trouble’ (1990), argues it is wrong to reinforce binary views of gender and assert that women are group with common characteristics and interests.
  • ‘we act, speak and talk in ways that consolidate an impression of being a man or a women.
    • we conform to social norms and are not biologically constructed.
24
Q

Summarise the generally accepted key characteristics of male language

A
  • Dominate conversation by topic initiation, topic shifts, lack of turn-yielding clues and interrupting and speaking more.
  • use more informal register through use of accent, taboo, slang, dialect, sociolect and grammatical variations, likely to use covert prestige to sustain masculine identity (likely to use nonstandard dialects).
  • Likely to be factual, competitive, direct and detached when speaking while maintaining a need for status.
25
Q

Summarise the characteristics of female language which are generally accepted

A
  • More submissive in conversation and speak less, unlikely to interrupt, initiate or change topics or attempt to hold the floor.
  • Likely to use overt prestige to create feminine identity and succumb to stereotypes of how ‘lady-like’ they should talk (formal lexis and less phonological variations)
  • More supportive, co-operative, polite and emotional when speaking.
26
Q

Describe Dale Spender’s (1980) ‘Man Made Language’ and her view on the dominance model

A
  • in mixed-sex conversations, men more likely to interrupt than women.
  • radical view of lang as embodying structures that sustain male power.
  • difficult to challenge power system as way we think reinforces male power.
  • inspired by study conducted by Zimmerman and West in 1975.
  • interpreted women’s silence (fewer turns speaking, interrupted and corrected more) a form of oppression.
    • example given include pronoun ‘he’, men being before women grammatically, and identifying the all-powerful God as being male.
  • generally accepts Dominance theory, does not accept ‘deficiency of women or concomitant supremacy of males’.
  • According to Spender (1980) there are 220 terms for promiscuous females but only 20 for males:
    • female: slag, slut
    • male: stud, player
27
Q

Explain the criticisms Dale Spender has of other linguistic studies

A
  • Moore (1922) found men talked more about work than women -> Spender thinks he ‘defined work implicitly as something which men do’, ‘skewed data in favour of men’.
  • Hartman (1976) -> women’s lang was euphemistic, ‘flowery’ and therefore a lesser. Spender thinks if men spoke as women did, he would say it was thoughtful, polished and balanced.
  • Spender says that ‘research has frequently been rigged’.
28
Q

Give some of the ideas Robin Lakoff gives in her book ‘Language and woman’s place’

A
  • if woman refuses to talk lady-like, is ridiculed and criticised as unfeminine, if does succumb, seen as unable to think clearly, unable to take part in a serious discussion.
  • 2 choices woman has, to be less than a woman or less than a person are highly painful.
  • women exp linguistic discrimination in 2 ways: way they are taught to use lang and lang used to treat them.
    • Both regulate women to certain subservient functions: that of sex object, or servant.
    • certain lexical items mean one thing applied to men, another to women (marked and unmarked terms)
29
Q

What are unmarked terms?

A
  • ‘normal’ or neutral form of a word.
  • Most of these in English are the male forms.
  • many actually carry explicit or covert prestige and power.
  • Many terms in English which have strong connotations that are dependent on gender.
  • E.g. priest
30
Q

What are marked terms?

A
  • different equivalent term.
  • often marked term is the female term.
  • usually the marked term carried with it reduced power or respect, or a negative association.
  • Many terms in English have strong connotations that are dependent on gender.
31
Q

List unmarked terms for men and the marked female equivalent of these terms, then comment on the connotations of each of these terms.

A
  • master = mistress
    • master is a man with authority (positive), mistress is a woman that a man may own along with other mistresses (negative).
  • male prostitute = prostitute
  • bachelor = spinster
    • bachelor is an educated man or man who has never unmarried, spinster is an old. unmarried, possibly undesirable woman.
  • surgeon = female surgeon
31
Q

List unmarked terms for men and the marked female equivalent of these terms, then comment on the connotations of each of these terms.

A
  • master = mistress
    • master is a man with authority (positive), mistress is a woman that a man may own along with other mistresses (negative).
  • male prostitute = prostitute
  • bachelor = spinster
    • bachelor is an educated man or man who has never unmarried, spinster is an old. unmarried, possibly undesirable woman.
  • surgeon = female surgeon
32
Q

Explain Janet Holme’s theory of animal imagery on gendered language

A
  • Animal imagery example where images of women seem less positive than those of men.
    • E.g. ‘bitch, old biddy, cow’ compared to ‘stud and wolf’ for men.
  • Imagery for men often at least has some positive component (e.g. sexual prowess).
  • ‘birds’ regarded as feather brained.
    • more positive ‘chick’ are sweet but helpless.
33
Q

Explain Janet Holmes theory on food imagery on gendered language

A
  • Women also referred to in terms of food imagery.
    • saccharine terms: ‘sugar, sweetie, honey’ mainly used for addressing women.
    • Less complimentary terms ‘crumpet, tart’ restricted to females.
  • Terms originally neutral eventually acquire connotations as they increasingly refer only to women, their meanings focus on women as sexual objects.
34
Q

Explain Julia Stanley’s theory on gendered language

A
  • Argued there was a negative semantic space for women. Couldn’t be writers, doctors, surgeons.
    • Women could only be women writers, female surgeons, lady doctors.
    • Similarly we referred to working ‘working mothers’ but not ‘working fathers’.
    • ‘drivers’ and ‘women drivers’, suggests women drivers and different from the usual ‘drivers’, possibly inferior.
35
Q

Explain Anne Bodine (1975) theory of androcentric language

A
  • There is a bias in the English language in favour of males -> andocentric language.
  • ‘man/mankind’ always a generic term but has been criticised because it implies that men are more important.
  • ‘man’ refers to the species as a whole and males - this is why the term men has been labelled the false generic.
36
Q

Explain the Sex Discrimination Act (1975) and how it helped change sexist language?

A
  • passed to stop sexual discrimination and harassment, esp at work and school.
  • was a push to get rid of sexist lang.
    • Reflected the work of feminist campaigners, who wanted to promote equality.
  • lang doesn’t just reflect sexist attitudes -> helps keep them alive.
37
Q

What is covert prestige?

A
  • The notion of going against the accepted norms of society by using non-standard forms of English, pronouncing with a strong accent and perhaps lowering one’s lexis.
38
Q

What is overt prestige?

A
  • Notion of trying to conform to socially respectable behaviour by using standard English, toning down one’s accent and perhaps raising one’s lexis.
39
Q

Describe Jenny Chesire’s study in Reading?

A
  • Cheshire investigated the speech of adolescents in an adventure playground and found similar patterns to those which exist among adults (as referred to by Trudgill).
    • Suggests some differences in male + female lang use are already strongly evident during childhood.
40
Q

Summarise the dominance theory?

A
  • Women traditionally occupied less powerful position in society than men, conversational behaviour is less assertive and less confident.
    • Men dominant within society so tend to reflect domination when engaging in mixed-sex convos.
    • Suggested this social conditioning is reason why women are often polite + respectful when talking to men.
41
Q

Summarise the theorists who go against the dominance theory?

A
  • Dale Spender (1980) + Zimmerman and West (1975): Shifted away from women’s talk as being somehow deficient.
  • Markers of female uncertainty, e.g. tag questions now reassessed, e.g. Fishman (1977) looked at how tag Qs were means of keeping convos going -> ‘conversational shit work’.
    • Spender looked at how lang is socially constructed by the dominant group in society (males).
42
Q

Summarise the difference model

A
  • Focus on differences in male and female attitudes and values -> date back to a person’s childhood.
    • Studies of children’s play found in boy’s play more emphasis on competition + confrontation, girls’ games are more focused on cooperation.
    • May reflect why in adulthood women’s talk focuses more on personal feelings + problems, more supportive in convos.
  • Deb Tanner ‘You don’t Understand’, men raised to view interaction for power, while women trained/raised to view them for like mindedness.
    • Men compete, women co-operate.
    • suggests we suffer from cross-cultural miscommunication.