GED L16 Notes Flashcards

1
Q

Contrast Mendelian & Complex traits

A
Mendelian Vs. Complex Traits
-	Mendelian:
	Single gene (monogenic)
High penetrance
	Predictable inheritance
	Simple relationship 
Genotype & phenotype
                   Eg. Cystic fibrosis
-	Complex:
(Multifactoral / quantitative)
	Multiple genes (polygenic) 
Low penetrance
	Familial clustering 
	Unpredictable inheritance
	Complex relationship 
Genotype & phenotype
	Strongly influenced by environment (Multifactoral)
	Prevalence -> ~600/1000
Eg. Alzheimers, Autism, Crohn’s, Athsma, Cleft lip, Coronary Heart Disease, Diabetes, Neural Tube defects / spina bifida
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Describe Mendelian traits

A
-	Mendelian:
	Single gene (monogenic)
High penetrance
	Predictable inheritance
	Simple relationship 
Genotype & phenotype
                   Eg. Cystic fibrosis
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Describe complex traits

A
-	Complex:
(Multifactoral / quantitative)
	Multiple genes (polygenic) 
Low penetrance
	Familial clustering 
	Unpredictable inheritance
	Complex relationship 
Genotype & phenotype
	Strongly influenced by environment (Multifactoral)
	Prevalence -> ~600/1000
Eg. Alzheimers, Autism, Crohn’s, Athsma, Cleft lip, Coronary Heart Disease, Diabetes, Neural Tube defects / spina bifida
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Give an example illustrating genetic & environmental influences on complex traits

A

• Genetic & Environmental Influences -> Complex Traits:
Eg. Type 2 Diabtetes
~ 6-8% population
Genetic: One affected parent -> 15%
Both parents affected -> 75%
Environment: BMI >30 -> 20%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Describe analysis of quantitative, complex traits

A
-	Quantitative Traits:
>Quantitative / continuous traits
	Complex traits 
Eg. Height, Blood Pressure, Serum, Cholesterol, BMI, Crop yield
                     Mean:
	Arithmetic Average (Centre of Distribution)
                     Variance:
	Spread of values around mean.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are quantitative traits?

A
  • Quantitative Traits:

>Quantitative / continuous traits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Give an example of quantitative complex traits?

A

Eg. Height, Blood Pressure, Serum, Cholesterol, BMI, Crop yield

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the mean?

A

 Mean:

 Arithmetic Average (Centre of Distribution)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the variance?

A

 Variance:

 Spread of values around mean.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What kind of graph / chart can be used to analyse quantitative, complex traits?

A

Normal distribution curve

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Describe analysis of discontinuous, complex traits

A
  • Discontinuous Traits:
    >Distcontinuous / Discrete traits
    -> Disease / Trait is either present or not present
     Complex traits
     Threshold Model:
     Underlying continuous liability (genetic & environmental factors)
    » Threshold above which disease / trait is present
     Families with incr. risk of trait / disease
    » Distribution of liability shifted towards threshold.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are discontinuous traits?

A
  • Discontinuous Traits:
    >Distcontinuous / Discrete traits
    -> Disease / Trait is either present or not present
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is used to analyse discontinuous, complex traits & describe how?

A

 Threshold Model:
 Underlying continuous liability (genetic & environmental factors)
» Threshold above which disease / trait is present
 Families with incr. risk of trait / disease
» Distribution of liability shifted towards threshold.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is used to analyse discontinuous, complex traits?

A

Threshold model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Describe the way in which discontinuous & continuous traits are analysed

A
  • Continuous & discontinuous traits

 Same underlying aetiology.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the polygene hypothesis?

A

Genetic basis of complex traits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

How is the polygene hypothesis measured?

A
  • Nature vs. nurture:

 Proportion of phenotypic variation in quantitative trait that is genetic or environmental.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What is nature vs. nurture in regards to the polygene hypothesis?

A
  • Nature vs. nurture:

 Proportion of phenotypic variation in quantitative trait that is genetic or environmental.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is the equation used to find the total phenotypic variance?

A

 VP = VG + VE
Total Phenotypic Variance = Genetic Variance + Environmental Variance
» VP can also be shown as VT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Describe how to calculate the total phenotypic variance?

A

 VP = VG + VE
Total Phenotypic Variance = Genetic Variance + Environmental Variance
» VP can also be shown as VT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What is heritability?

A

 Proportion of phenotypic variance due to genes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Describe heritability

A

 Heritability
 Proportion of phenotypic variance due to genes
 H2 = VG / VP
 H2 -> value between 0 – 1
 High heritability
&raquo_space; Genetic differences in population
&raquo_space; High proportion of phenotypic variation
-» Easier to identify genetic variants associated with trait than using
traits with low heritability.
 Estimating Heritability:
» Twin Heritabilty Studies:
1. Identical (monozygotic twins ; MZ)
Share same environment & all alleles
Relatedness ; r = 1
2. Non-identical (dizygotic twins ; DZ)
Share same environment & half of their alleles
Relatedness ; r = 0.5
 If MZ twins resemble more than DZ twins ; genes contribute to
variation in trait .
> Assumes equal environmental effects
&raquo_space; Twin Concordance Studies:
 Concordance:
Probability a twin is affected by a particular trait if their twin is
affected.
> Concordance = 1.0 -> Other twin always affected
= 0.6 -> 60% chance other twin affected.
 Difference in concordance between MZ & DZ twins used to estimate hertitability.
Eg. MZ concordance = 0.50 (50%) ; DZ = 0.08 (8%)
Heritability = 0.85
 Heritability Estimates in Humans:
 Autism -> 0.4 - 0.9
 BMI -> 0.5 – 0.9
 Crohn’s -> 0.75
 Height -> 0.6 – 0.8
 IQ -> 0.3 – 0.8
 T1 Diabetes -> 0.9
 T2 Diabetes -> 0.4 – 0.8

                             High heritability does not mean genetic determination. 
                             Differences between groups with high heritability for a trait are not  
                                 the result of genetic differences.
23
Q

What is the equation used to calculate heritability?

A

H2 = VG / VP

24
Q

Describe how the value of heritability can be interpreted

A
 H2 = VG / VP
 H2 -> value between 0 – 1
 High heritability 
   >> Genetic differences in population 
   >> High proportion of phenotypic variation
25
Describe the way in which it is easier to identify genetic variants associated with a trait and why.
By using population with higher heritability value because this indicates genetic differences in population are due to a high proportion of genetic variation
26
Describe the use of twin studies to study heritability
 Estimating Heritability: >> Twin Heritabilty Studies: 1. Identical (monozygotic twins ; MZ) Share same environment & all alleles Relatedness ; r = 1 2. Non-identical (dizygotic twins ; DZ) Share same environment & half of their alleles Relatedness ; r = 0.5  If MZ twins resemble more than DZ twins ; genes contribute to variation in trait . > Assumes equal environmental effects >> Twin Concordance Studies:  Concordance: Probability a twin is affected by a particular trait if their twin is affected. > Concordance = 1.0 -> Other twin always affected = 0.6 -> 60% chance other twin affected.  Difference in concordance between MZ & DZ twins used to estimate hertitability. Eg. MZ concordance = 0.50 (50%) ; DZ = 0.08 (8%) Heritability = 0.85
27
Describe identical twins
1. Identical (monozygotic twins ; MZ) Share same environment & all alleles Relatedness ; r = 1
28
Describe non-identical twins
2. Non-identical (dizygotic twins ; DZ) Share same environment & half of their alleles Relatedness ; r = 0.5
29
What does it mean if MZ twins resemble more than DZ twins?
 If MZ twins resemble more than DZ twins ; genes contribute to variation in trait . > Assumes equal environmental effects
30
Describe twin concordance studies
>> Twin Concordance Studies:  Concordance: Probability a twin is affected by a particular trait if their twin is affected. > Concordance = 1.0 -> Other twin always affected = 0.6 -> 60% chance other twin affected.  Difference in concordance between MZ & DZ twins used to estimate hertitability. Eg. MZ concordance = 0.50 (50%) ; DZ = 0.08 (8%) Heritability = 0.85
31
How is heritability estimated using twins?
Twin concordance studies |  Difference in concordance between MZ & DZ twins used to estimate hertitability.
32
What does a concordance value of 1 mean in relation to concordance twin studies?
Concordance = 1.0 -> Other twin always affected by a particular trait if their twin is affected.
33
Give examples of Heritability Estimates of Humans in regards to different factors
```  Heritability Estimates in Humans:  Autism -> 0.4 - 0.9  BMI -> 0.5 – 0.9  Crohn’s -> 0.75  Height -> 0.6 – 0.8  IQ -> 0.3 – 0.8  T1 Diabetes -> 0.9  T2 Diabetes -> 0.4 – 0.8 ```
34
What are two important corrections to misconceptions surrounding heritability?
 High heritability does not mean genetic determination.  Differences between groups with high heritability for a trait are not the result of genetic differences.
35
What are two important facts to note regarding heritability?
 High heritability does not mean genetic determination.  Differences between groups with high heritability for a trait are not the result of genetic differences.
36
Describe genetic variance & human Disease
• Genetic Variance & Human Disease  Common Disease – Rare Variant Hypothesis (CD-RV)  Common Disease – Common Variant Hypothesis (CD-CV)  Disease-Associated Alleles should be common: - Late onset diseases  Little effect on fitness (Weak Purifying Selection) - Advantageous / Neutral alleles in the past  May confer disease susceptibility in modern societies
37
Describe why Disease-associated alleles should be common
- Little effect on fitness (Weak Purifying Selection) - Advantageous / Neutral alleles in the past  May confer disease susceptibility in modern societies - Disease causing alleles  Maintained at high frequency by balancing selection.
38
Describe Genome wide Association studies
• Genome Wide Association Studies (GWAS)  Population – level approach to disease gene mapping.  Identification of SNPs: - Cases: C Allele -> 62% T Allele -> 38% - Controls: C Allele -> 49% T Allele -> 51% - Odds ratio for C allele:  (Odds of disease with C) / (Odds of disease with T) = [A/B] / [C/D] = [62/49] / [38/51] = 1.7 - Allele odds ratio ; >1.0 -> Allele gives Higher risk of disease < 1.0 -> Allele is protective  Process:  Coloured dots represent single SNP on DNA chip  Odds ratio (OR) for each variant calculated  Probability (P) OR is significantly higher in cases compared to controls i illustrated -> Manhattan Plot.  Manhattan plot Illustrates the probability -> Odds ratio of an allele is significantly higher in cases compared to controls. Variants of high significant associations with trait visible as skyscrapers.  Haplotype Blocks: Groups of closely linked haplotypes (SNPS on the same chromosome) which are inherited together.  Each haplotype block -> defined by small no. tag SNPs  Linkage Disequilibrium: Co-inheritance of SNPs in a haplotype block
39
What are Genome wide association studies used for
 Population – level approach to disease gene mapping. |  Identification of SNPs -> Odds ratio of allele
40
Describe how SNPs can be identified using genome wide association studies
 Identification of SNPs: - Cases: C Allele -> 62% T Allele -> 38% - Controls: C Allele -> 49% T Allele -> 51% - Odds ratio for C allele:  (Odds of disease with C) / (Odds of disease with T) = [A/B] / [C/D] = [62/49] / [38/51] = 1.7 - Allele odds ratio ; >1.0 -> Allele gives Higher risk of disease < 1.0 -> Allele is protective
41
Describe what an allele odds ratio of >1 means
>1.0 -> Allele gives Higher risk of disease
42
Describe what an allele odds ratio of <1 means
< 1.0 -> Allele is protective
43
Describe the process in which genome wide association studies are used
 Process:  Coloured dots represent single SNP on DNA chip  Odds ratio (OR) for each variant calculated  Probability (P) OR is significantly higher in cases compared to controls i illustrated -> Manhattan Plot.
44
What does a Manhattan plot illustrate & how is info analysed?
 Manhattan plot Illustrates the probability -> Odds ratio of an allele is significantly higher in cases compared to controls. Variants of high significant associations with trait visible as skyscrapers.
45
What is a Manhattan plot used for?
Genome wide association studies for identification of SNPs
46
What are haplotype blocks?
 Haplotype Blocks: Groups of closely linked haplotypes (SNPS on the same chromosome) which are inherited together.  Each haplotype block -> defined by small no. tag SNPs
47
What is linkage disequilibrium
 Linkage Disequilibrium: | Co-inheritance of SNPs in a haplotype block
48
Describe haplotype blocks
 Haplotype Blocks: Groups of closely linked haplotypes (SNPS on the same chromosome) which are inherited together.  Each haplotype block -> defined by small no. tag SNPs
49
Describe linakge disequilibrium
• Linkage Disequilibrium: - Linkage Equilibrium:  Each haplotype present in expected frequency based on allele frequency calculations. Eg. EF(AB) = F(A) x F(B) - Linkage Disequilibrium:  Some haplotyoes present at higher / lower expected frequencies based on allele frequency calculations. - Causative Role in Disease  SNP 1 -> Linkage disequilibrium with SNP 2 >>But is not causative  Association between SNP 1 & disease illustrates haplotype block carrying causative agent (SNP)
50
Describe what linkage equilibrium is
- Linkage Equilibrium:  Each haplotype present in expected frequency based on allele frequency calculations. Eg. EF(AB) = F(A) x F(B)
51
Describe linkage disequilibrium in regards to calculation of haplotype frequency
- Linkage Disequilibrium: |  Some haplotyoes present at higher / lower expected frequencies based on allele frequency calculations.
52
Describe causative role in disease in relation to linkage disequilibrium
- Causative Role in Disease  SNP 1 -> Linkage disequilibrium with SNP 2 >>But is not causative  Association between SNP 1 & disease illustrates haplotype block carrying causative agent (SNP)
53
Describe the role / contributions of GWAS in human disease genetics
• Role of GWAS in Human Disease Genetics: - Majority of disease-associated variants have small incr. risk of disease. - >90% variants present in non-coding DNA >>Difficult to identify causal variant. - Generate new biological hypotheses about causes of disease Eg. Inflammatory Bowel Disease & Autophagy. - Studies of rare SNPs & other types of DNA seq. variation - eg. Copy Number Variants (CNV) – necessary to further understand complex traits.